Erratum to On the adjudication of conflicting claims: An experimental study (Soc Choice Welf, (2009)), 33, 3 (517-519), DOI 10.1007/s00355-009-0398-0;On the adjudication of conflicting claims: An experimental study

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 145-179

  Herrero, Carmen ^a,b   Moreno Ternero, Juan D ^c,d,e   Ponti, Giovanni ^a,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^b IVI   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^f UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75549090351     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-009-0406-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Aumann RJ, Maschler M (1985) Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. J Econ Theory 36: 195-213.
2. Ashenfelter O, Bloom DE (1984) Models of arbitrator behavior: theory and evidence. Am Econ Rev 74: 111-124.
3. Ashenfelter O, Currie J, Farber HS, Spiegel M (1992) An experimental comparison of dispute rates in alternative arbitration systems. Econometrica 60: 1407-1433.
4. Bar-Hillel M, Yaari M (1993) Judgments of distributive justice. In: Mellers B, Baron J (eds) Psychological perspectives on justice: theory and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.
5. Binmore K, Osborne M, Rubinstein A (1992) Noncooperative models of bargaining. In: Aumann R, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory I. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
6. Binmore K (1998) Game theory and the social contract, vol II: Just playing. MIT Press, Cambridge.
7. Bosmans K, Schokkaert E (2007) Equality preference in the claims problem: a questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensions. CORE Discussion Paper 2007/30.
8. Cuadras-Morató X, Pinto-Prades JL, Abellán-Perpiñán JM (2001) Equity considerations in health care: the relevance of claims. Health Econ 10: 187-205.
9. Chun Y (1989) A noncooperative justification for egalitarian surplus sharing. Math Soc Sci 17: 245-261.
10. Costa-Gomes M, Crawford V, Broseta B (2001) Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: an experimental study. Econometrica 69: 1193-1235.
11. Dagan N, Serrano R, Volij O (1997) A Noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules. Games Econ Behav 18: 55-72.
12. Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Q J Econ 114: 817-868.
13. Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10(2): 171-178.
14. Frolich N, Oppenheimer JA, Eavey CL (1987) Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groups. Am J Polit Sci 31: 606-636.
15. Gächter S, Riedl A (2006) Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims: normative judgements and actual negotiations. Soc Choice Welf 27: 571-594.
16. Gauthier D (1986) Morals by agreement. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
17. Ju B-G, Miyagawa E, Sakai T (2007) Non-Manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations. J Econ Theory 132: 1-26.
18. Ju B-G, Moreno-Ternero JD (2008) On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction. Soc Choice Welf 30(4): 561-569.
19. Hart O (1999) Different approaches to bankruptcy, in governance, equity and global markets. In: Proceedings of the annual bank conference on development economics in Europe June 21-23.
20. Herrero C (2003) Equal awards versus equal losses: duality in bankruptcy. In: Sertel MR, Koray S (eds) Advances in economic design. Springer, Berlin, pp 413-426.
21. Herrero C, Villar A (2001) The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. Math Soc Sci 42: 307-328.
22. Herrero C, Moreno-Ternero JD, Ponti G (2003) An experiment on bankruptcy. IVIE Discussion Paper WP-AD 2003-03.
23. Kaminski M (2006) Parametric rationing methods. Games Econ Behav 54: 115-133.
24. Moreno-Ternero JD (2002) Noncooperative support for the proportional rule in bankruptcy problems. Universidad de Alicante, Mimeo.
25. Moulin H (2000) Priority rules and other asymmetric rationing methods. Econometrica 68: 643-684.
26. Moulin H (2002) Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing. In: Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare, vol I. Elsevier Science B. V, Amsterdam.
27. Nash J (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21: 128-140.
28. O'Neill B (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Math Soc Sci 2: 345-371.
29. Ochs J, Roth A (1989) An experimental study of sequential bargaining. Am Econ Rev 79: 355-384.
30. Roemer JE (1996) Theories of distributive justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
31. Skyrms B (1996) Evolution of the social contract. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Sugden R (1986) The Economics of rights, cooperation and welfare. Basil Blackwell, Inc, Oxford.
33. Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. Math Soc Sci 45: 249-297.
34. Yaari ME, Bar-Hillel M (1984) On dividing justly. Soc Choice Welf 1: 1-24.