Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims: Normative judgments and actual negotiations

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 571-594

  Gächter, Simon ^a,b,c   Riedl, Arno ^b,d  

^a CESIFO   (Germany)

^b IZA   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750153409     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-006-0141-z     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Albers W. Albers G (1983) On the prominence structure of the decimal system. In: Scholz RW (ed) Decision making under uncertainty. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 271-287
2. Aumann RJ, Maschler M (1985) Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. J Econ Theory 36:195-213
3. Babcock L, Camerer C, Issacharoff S, Caraerer CF (1995) Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. Am Econ Rev 85:1337-1343
4. Ball S, Eckel C, Grossman PJ, Zame W (2001) Status in markets. Q J Econ 116:161-188
5. Beckman SR, Formby JP, Smith JW, Zheng B (2002) Envy, malice and Pareto efficiency: an experimental examination. Soc Choice Welfare 19:349-367
6. Brandel F (2000) Rabbit: version 1.0. Mimeo, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna
7. Chun Y, Thomson W (1992) Bargaining problems with claims. Math Soc Sci 24:19-33
8. Chun Y, Schummer J and Thomson W (2001) Constrained egalitarianism: a new solution to bankruptcy problems. Seoul J Econ 14:269-297
9. Clark J (1998) Fairness in public good provision: an investigation of preferences for equality and proportionality. Can J Econ 31:708-729
10. Curiel T, Maschler M. Tijs SH (1987) Bankruptcy games. Z Oper Res 31:A143-A159
11. Dagan N (1996) New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules. Soc Choice Welfare 13:51-59
12. Dagan N, Volij O (1993) The bankruptcy problem: a cooperative bargaining approach. Math Soc Sci 26:287-297
13. Dagan N, Serrano R, Volij O (1997) A non-cooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules. Games Econ Behav 26:55-72
14. Feldman B (1999) The proportional value of a cooperative game. Mimeo
15. Frohlich N, Oppenheimer JA (1990) Choosing justice in experimental democracies with production. Am Poli Sei Rev 84(2):461-477
16. Frohlich N, Oppenheimer JA, Eavey CL (1987) Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groups. Am J Polit Sci 31(3):606-637
17. Gächter S, Riedl A (2005) Moral property rights in bargaining with infeasible claims. Manage Sci 51 (2):249-263
18. Gaertner W, Jungeilges J (2002) Evaluation via extended orderings: empirical findings from Western and Eastern Europe. Soc Choice Welfare 19:29-55
19. Gaertner W, Klemisch-Ahlert M (1992) Social choice and bargaining perspectives on distributive justice. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
20. Gaertner W, Jungeilges J, Neck R (2001) Cross-cultural equity evaluations: A questionnaireexperimental approach. Eur Econ Rev 45:953-963
21. Herrero C, Villar A (2001) The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. Math Soc Sci 42:307-328
22. Herrero C, Moreno-Ternero JD, Ponti G (2004) On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study. Working paper, University of Alicante
23. Hoffman E, McCabe K, Shachat K, Smith V (1994) Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games Econ Beha 7:346-380
24. Kahneman D, Knetsch J, Thaler R (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Am Econ Rev 76(4):728-741
25. Klemisch-Ahlert M (1996) Bargaining in economic and ethical environments. An experimental study and normative solution concepts. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
26. Konow J (2000) Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. Am Econ Rev 90:1072-1091
27. Konow J (2002) Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. J Econ Lit XLI:1188-1239
28. Kuon B, Uhlich GR (1993) The negotiation agreement area: an experimental analysis of twoperson characteristic function games. Group Decis Negotiat 2:323-345
29. Loewenstein G (2000) Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 90:426-432
30. Moulin H (1987) Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods. Inter J Game Theory 16:161-186
31. Moulin H (2000) Priority rules and other asymmetric rationing methods. Econometrica 68:643-684
32. Nydegger RV, Owen G (1975) Two-person bargaining: an experimental test of the Nash axioms. Inter J Game Theory 3:239-249
33. O'Neill B (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the talmud. Math Soc Sci 2:345-371
34. Roth AE, Murnighan KJ (1982) The role of information in bargaining: an experimental study. Econometrica 50:1123-1142
35. Roth AE, Murnighan KJ, Schoumaker F (1988) The deadline effect in bargaining: some experimental evidence. Am Eco Rev 78:155-162
36. Schokkaert E, Capeau B (1991) Interindividual differences in opinions about distributive justice. Kyklos 44(3):325-345
37. Schokkaert E, Overlaet B (1989) Moral intuitions and economic models of distributive justice. Soc Choice Welfare 6:19-31
38. Selten R (1978) The equity principle in economic behavior. In: Gottinger HW, Leinfellner W (ed) Decision theory and social effects. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 289-301
39. Selten R (1987) Equity and coalition bargaining in experimental three-person games. In: Roth AE (ed) Laboratory experimentation in economics: six points of view. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 42-98
40. Selten R (1991) Properties of a measure of predictive success. Math Soc Sci 21:153-167
41. Selten R, Krischker S (1983) Comparison of two theories for characteristic function experiments. In: Tietz R (ed) Aspiration levels in bargaining and economics decision making. Springer. Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 259-264
42. Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analyses of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. Math Soc Sci 45:249-297
43. Uhlich GR (1990) Descriptive theories of bargaining: an experimental analysis of two- and three-person characteristic function bargaining. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 341. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
44. Yaari ME, Bar-Hillel M (1984) On dividing justly. Soc Choice Welfare 1:1-24
45. Young HP (1988) Distributive justice in taxation. J Econ Theory 43:321-335