The relationship between academic patenting and scientific publishing in Norway

Scientometrics

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 93-108

  Klitkou, Antje ^a   Gulbrandsen, Magnus ^a,b  

^a NORDIC INSTITUTE FOR STUDIES IN INNOVATION   (Norway)

^b CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Academic entrepreneurship; Academic patenting; Commercialisation of research; Scientific publishing

Indexed keywords

EID: 75549088612     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0050-x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60.
2. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2007). The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 599-623.
3. Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35(4), 518-532.
4. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: Open University Press.
5. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734-1739.
6. Blumenthal, D., Causino, N., & Campbell, E. G. (1997). Academic industry research relationships in genetics: A field apart. Nature Genetics, 16(1), 104-108.
7. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2005). From publishing to patenting: Do productive scientists turn into academic inventors? Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 0(110), 75-102.
8. Calderini, M., & Franzoni, C. (2004). Is academic patenting detrimental to high quality research? An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications. In CESPRI Working Paper, vol. n., pp. 26. Università Commerciale "Luigi Bocconi", CESPRI, Milano.
9. Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., & Vezzulli, A. (2007). If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world. Research Policy, 36(3), 303-319.
10. Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, N. N., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., et al. (2002). Data withholding in academic genetics-Evidence from a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(4), 473-480.
11. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: Pergamon.
12. Coupé, T. (2003). Science is golden: Academic R& D and university patents. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 31-46.
13. Elzinga, A. (1983). Research, bureaucracy and the drift of epistemic criteria. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University, Department of Theory of Science.
14. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823-833.
15. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
16. Florida, R., & Cohen, W. M. (1999). Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development. In L. M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, & R. Florida (Eds.), Industrializing knowledge. University-industry linkages in Japan and the United States (pp. 589-610). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Geuna, A. (2001). The changing rationale for European university research funding: Are there negative unintended consequences? Journal of Economic Issues, 35(3), 607-632.
18. Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The Emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790-807.
19. Godin, B. (1998). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Social Studies of Science, 28(3), 465-483.
20. Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy, 29(2), 273-278.
21. Gulbrandsen, M. (2005). But Peter's in it for the money"-The liminality of entrepreneurial scientists. VEST Journal for Science and Technology Studies, 18(1-2), 49-75.
22. Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932-950.
23. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119-127.
24. Iversen, E. J., Gulbrandsen, M., & Klitkou, A. (2007). A baseline for the impact of academic patenting legislation in Norway. Scientometrics, 70(2), 393-414.
25. Martin, B. R. (2003). The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. In A. Geuna, A. J. Salter, & W. E. Steinmueller (Eds.), Science and innovation. Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
26. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56-63.
27. Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science II. Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79, 606-623.
28. Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms. R& D Management, 33(2), 107-115.
29. Meyer, M. (2006). Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of patenting researchers with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Scientometrics, 68(3), 545-560.
30. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory Tower and industrial innovation: University-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). Universities in national innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 209-239). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy, 31(3), 399-418.
33. Nelson, R. R. (2001). Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 13-19.
34. OECD. (2003). Turning science into business: Patenting and licensing at public research organisations. Washington, D. C.: OECD.
35. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 99-114.
36. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (1996). The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology. Science. Technology & Human Values, 21(3), 303-339.
37. Stephan, P. E., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A. J., & Black, G. (2007). Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 71-99.
38. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
39. van Looy, B., Callaert, J., & Debackere, K. (2006). Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy, 35(4), 596-608.
40. van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425-441.
41. Vavakova, B. (1998). The new social contract between governments, universities and society: Has the old one failed? Minerva, 36(3), 209-228.
42. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U. S. biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 290-306.