Three-body wear of resin denture teeth with and without nanofillers

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 108-117

  Stober, Thomas ^a   Henninger, Moritz ^a   Schmitter, Marc ^a   Pritsch, Maria ^a   Rammelsberg, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ALUMINUM SILICATE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FELDSPAR; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NANOMATERIAL; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYURETHAN; POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE; RESIN; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ALUMINUM SILICATES; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOSTRUCTURES; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; POLYURETHANES; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 75149186535     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60014-5     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bayne S.C., Taylor D.F., and Heymann H.O. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 8 (1992) 305-309
2. Coffey J.P., Goodkind R.J., DeLong R., and Douglas W.H. In vitro study of the wear characteristics of natural and artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 54 (1985) 273-280
3. Condon J.R., and Ferracane J.L. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 1405-1411
4. Douglas W.H., DeLong R., Pintado M.R., and Latta M.A. Wear rates of artificial denture teeth opposed by natural dentition. J Clin Dent 4 (1993) 43-47
5. Frankenberger R., García-Godoy F., Lohbauer U., Petschelt A., and Krämer N. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I: in vitro investigations. Am J Dent 18 (2005) 23-27
6. Ghazal M., Albashaireh Z.S., and Kern M. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 100 (2008) 441-448
7. Hahnel S., Behr M., Handel G., and Rosentritt M. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material. J Prosthet Dent 101 (2009) 269-278
8. Hirano S., May K.B., Wagner W.C., and Hacker C.H. In vitro wear of resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998) 152-155
9. Jooste C., Geerts G., and Adams L. Comparison of the clinical abrasion resistance of six commercially available denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 77 (1997) 23-27
10. Kim S.K., Kim K.N., Chang I.T., and Heo S.J. A study of the effects of chewing patterns on occlusal wear. J Oral Rehabil 28 (2001) 1048-1055
11. Lindquist T.J., Ogle R.E., and Davis E.L. Twelve-month results of a clinical wear study of three artificial tooth materials. J Prosthet Dent 74 (1995) 156-161
12. Loyaga-Rendon P.G., Takahashi H., Hayakawa I., and Iwasaki N. Compositional characteristics and hardness of acrylic and composite resin artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 98 (2007) 141-149
13. Manhart J., Kunzelmann K.H., Chen H.Y., and Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 16 (2000) 33-40
14. Ogle R.E., and Davis E.L. Clinical wear study of three commercially available artificial tooth materials: thirty-six month results. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998) 145-151
15. Ohlmann B., Rohstock K., Kugler J., Gilde H., Dreyhaupt J., and Stober T. Influences on clinical wear of acrylic denture teeth: a pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 20 (2007) 496-498
16. Ratledge D.K., Smith B.G., and Wilson R.F. The effect of restorative materials on the wear of human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 72 (1994) 194-203
17. Reich S.M., Petschelt A., Wichmann M., and Frankenberger R. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of veneering composites and their matrices. J Biomed Mater Res A 69 (2004) 65-69
18. Schwartz J.I., and Söderholm K.J. Effects of filler size, water, and alcohol on hardness and laboratory wear of dental composites. Acta Odontol Scand 62 (2004) 102-106
19. Suzuki S. In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth. J Prosthodont 13 (2004) 238-243
20. Stober T., Lutz T., Gilde H., and Rammelsberg P. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 243-249
21. Wassel R.W., McCabe J.F., and Walls A.W. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mater 10 (1994) 269-274
22. Whitman D.J., McKinney J.E., Hinman R.W., Hesby R.A., and Pelleu Jr. G.B. In vitro wear rates of three types of commercial denture tooth materials. J Prosthet Dent 57 (1987) 243-246
23. Schmid-Schwap M., Rousson V., Vornwagner K., and Heintze S.D. Wear of two artificial tooth materials in vivo: a 12-month pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 102 (2009) 104-114
24. von Fraunhofer J.A., Razavi R., and Khan Z. Wear characteristics of high-strength denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 59 (1988) 173-175
25. Yesil Z.D., Alapati S., Johnston W., and Seghi R.R. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 99 (2008) 435-443
26. Lambrechts P., Debels E., Van Landuyt K., Peumans M., and Van Meerbeek B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 693-701
27. Stachowiak G. Wear- materials, mechanisms and practice (2006), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 9-18
28. International Standards Organization. ISO/TS 14569-2: 2001 (E). Dental materials - guidance on testing of wear - part 2: wear by two- and/or three body contact (2001), ISO, Geneva. Available at: http://webstore.ansi.org
29. Heintze S.D. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 712-734
30. De Gee A.J., Pallav P., and Davidson C.L. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res 65 (1986) 654-658
31. Heintze S.D., Zappini G., and Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators - results of a round robin test. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 304-317
32. Heintze S.D., Zellweger G., Cavalleri A., and Ferracane J. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 166-175
33. Hu X., Shortall A.C., and Marquis P.M. Wear of three dental composites under different testing conditions. J Oral Rehabil 29 (2002) 756-764
34. de Gee A.J., and Pallav P. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. J Dent 22 Suppl 1 (1994) S21-S27
35. Finger W., and Thiemann J. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo wear of posterior restorative materials. Dent Mater 3 (1987) 280-286
36. Sakaguchi R.L., Douglas W.H., DeLong R., and Pintado M.R. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 2 (1986) 235-240
37. Azzopardi A., Bartlett D.W., Watson T.F., and Smith B.G. A literature review of the techniques to measure tooth wear and erosion. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 8 (2000) 93-97
38. Perry R., Kugel G., Kunzelmann K.H., Flessa H.P., and Estafan D. Composite restoration wear analysis: conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer. J Am Dent Assoc 131 (2000) 1472-1477
39. Sulong M.Z., and Aziz R.A. Wear of materials used in dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 63 (1990) 342-349
40. DeLong R. Intra-oral restorative materials wear: rethinking the current approaches: how to measure wear. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 702-711
41. Yip K.H., Smales R.J., and Kaidonis J.A. Differential wear of teeth and restorative materials: clinical implications. Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004) 350-356
42. Hochberg Y., and Tamhane A.C. Multiple comparison procedures (1987), John Wiley & Sons, New York 54-55