Initial teacher education in the panopticon

Journal of Education for Teaching

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 283-297

  Wilkins, Chris ^a   Wood, Phil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accountability; Inspection; Performativity; Teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 75149145441     PISSN: 02607476     EISSN: 13600540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02607470903092821     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Apple, M.W. 2005. Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly 47, nos 1-2: 11-29.
2. Ball, S.J. 1994. Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
3. Ball, S.J. 2003. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18, no. 2: 215-28.
4. Ball, S.J. 2008. The education debate. Bristol: The Policy Press.
5. Blair, T. 1996. 20 years on. Guardian. http://education.guardian.co.uk/thegreatdebate/story/0,,586338,00.html.
6. Bubb, S., P. Earley, E. Ahtaridou, J. Jones, and C. Taylor. 2007. The self-evaluation form: Is the SEF aiding school improvement? Management in Education 21, no. 3: 32-7.
7. Cox, C.B., and A.E. Dyson. 1969. Fight for education: A black paper. London: Critical Quarterly Society
8. Demaine, J. 1995. English radicalism and the reform of teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching 21, no. 2: 177-90.
9. Du Gay, P. 1996. Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.
10. Fielding, M. 2001. Ofsted, inspection and the betrayal of democracy. Journal of Philosophy in Education 35, no. 4: 695-709.
11. Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
12. Furlong, J. 1996. Re-defining partnership: Revolution or reform in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching 22, no. 1: 39-56.
13. Furlong, J. 2005. New Labour and teacher education: The end of an era. Oxford Review of Education 31, no. 1: 119-34.
14. Furlong, J., L. Barton, S. Miles, C. Whiting and G. Whitty. 2000. Teacher education in transition - reforming professionalism? Buckingham: Open University Press.
15. Galton, M., and J. MacBeath. 2008. Teachers under pressure. London: Sage
16. Ghouri, N. and N. Barnard. 1998. Training courses go after poor inspections. Times Education Supplement 2.
17. Gilroy, D.P. 1992. The political rape of initial teacher education in England and Wales: A JET rebuttal. Journal of Education for Teaching 18: 5-22.
18. Gilroy, P. 1998. New Labour and teacher education in England and Wales: The first 500 days. Journal of Education for Teaching 24, no. 3: 221-30.
19. Gilroy, P. 1999. Inspecting the inspecting of teacher education in England and Wales. Journal of Education for Teaching 25, no. 3: 215-9.
20. Grace, G. 1996. School leadership: Beyond educational management - an essay in policy scholarship. London: Falmer Press.
21. Harlen, W., and R. Deakin Crick. 2002. A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students' motivation for learning. In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
22. Hatcher, R. 2005. The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education 26, no. 2: 253-67.
23. Hayes, D. 2001. Professional status and an emerging culture of conformity amongst teachers in England. Education 3-13 29, no. 11: 43-9.
24. Hill, D. 1990. Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: Schooling, teacher education and the radical right in Britain and the USA. London: Tuffnell Press.
25. Hillgate Group. 1986. Whose schools? A radical manifesto. London: Hillgate Place.
26. Inglis, F. 2000. A malediction upon management. Journal of Education Policy 15, no. 4: 417-29.
27. Leaton Gray, S. 2006. What does it mean to be a teacher? Three tensions within contemporary teacher professionalism examined in terms of government policy and the knowledge economy. Forum 48, no. 3: 305-15.
28. Lyotard, J.F. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
29. MacBeath, J. 2006. School inspection and self-evaluation. Working with the new relationship. London: Routledge.
30. MacBeath, J., and A. McGlynn. 2002. Self-evaluation: What's in it for schools. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
31. Mahony, P., and I. Hextall. 1997. Problems of accountability in reinvented government: A case study of the Teacher Training Agency. Journal of Education Policy 12, no. 4: 267-78.
32. Mahony, P., and I. Hextall. 2000. Reconstructing teaching: Standards, performance and accountability. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
33. Mansell, W. 2007. Education by numbers; the tyranny of testing. London: Politicos.
34. Moon, B. 2003. A retrospective review of the national case studies on institutional approaches to teacher education. In Institutional approaches to teacher education within higher education in Europe: Current models and new developments, ed. B. Moon, L. Vlasceau, and L.C. Barrows. Bucharest: UNESCO.
35. Ofsted. 2004. A new relationship with schools: Improving performance through school self-evaluation. London: DfES.
36. Ofsted. 2008. What to do if a school has not completed a self-evaluation form (SEF). Ofsted. www.ofsted.gov.uk/portal/site/Internet/menuitem.eace3f09a603f6d9c3172a8a08c08a0c/?vgnextoid=b06f367e7b423110VgnVCM1000003507640aRCRD.
37. Palmer, F. 1986. Anti-racism: An assault on education and values. Wiltshire: Sherwood Press.
38. Perryman, J. 2006. Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mech-anisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy 21, no. 2: 147-61.
39. Poulson, L. 1998. Accountability, teacher professionalism and education reform in England. Teacher Development 2, no. 3: 419-31.
40. QCA. 2001. School sampling project: Monitoring the school curriculum 2000-01: Report on the primary curriculum questionnaire. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
41. QCA. 2005. A review of GCE and GCSE coursework arrangements. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
42. Robinson, M. 2005. Uncertainty and innovation. Journal of Education for Teaching 31, no. 4: 263-4.
43. Rowe, M. 1994. Joined up accountability: Bringing the citizen back. Public Policy and Administration 14, no. 2: 91-102.
44. Sachs, J. 2003. The activist professional. Buckingham: Open University Press.
45. Torrance, H. 2007. Assessment 'as' learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 14, no. 3: 281-94.
46. Troman, G. 1997. Self-management and school inspection: Complementary forms of surveillance and control in the primary school. Oxford Review of Education 23, no. 3: 345-64.
47. Turner-Bisset, R. 2007. Performativity by stealth: A critique of recent initiatives on creativity. Education 3-13 35, no. 2: 193-203. www.informaworld.com/smpp/titlecontent=t725445575db=alltab=issueslistbranches=35-v35.
48. Woods, P. 2004. Democratic leadership: Drawing distinctions with distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education 7, no. 1: 3-26.
49. Wrigley, T. 2003. Schools of hope: A new agenda for school improvement. Stoke: Trentham Books.