Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures

Journal of Education Policy

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 147-161

  Perryman, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31844456724     PISSN: 02680939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02680930500500138     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Avis, J. (2005) Beyond performativity: reflections on activist professionalism and the labour process in further education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(2), 209-222.
2. Ball, S. (1997) Good school/bad school: paradox and fabrication, British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 18(3), 317-336.
3. Ball, S. (2003) The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity, Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-288.
4. Bentham, J. (1787) Panopticon: or, the inspection-house (Dublin, Thomas Byrne).
5. Barley, P. (Ed.) (1998) School improvement after inspection? School and LEA responses (London, Paul Chapman).
6. Elliott, J. (2001) Characteristics of performative cultures: their central paradoxes and limitations as resources for educational reform, in: D. Gleeson & C. Husbands (Eds) The performing school: managing teaching and learning in a performance culture (London, RoutledgeFalmer).
7. Foucault, M. (1963) The birth of the clinic: an archaeology of medical perception (London, Routledge).
8. Foucault, M. (1977a) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison (Harmondsworth, Penguin).
9. Foucault, M. (1977b) The eye of power, in: C. Gordon (Ed.) Michel Foucault: power/knowledge (Hemel Hempstead, Harvest), 63-77.
10. Gleeson, D. & Gunter, H. (2001) The performing school and the modernisation of teachers, in: D. Gleeson & C. Husbands (Eds) The performing school: managing teaching and learning in a performance culture (London, RoutledgeFalmer).
11. Hamilton, D. (1997) Peddling feel-good fictions, in: J. White & M. Barber (Eds) Perspectives on school effectiveness and school improvement (London, Bedford Way Press), 125-130.
12. Harland, J. (1996) Evaluation as realpolitik, in: D. Scott & R. Usher (Eds) Understanding educational research (London, Routledge), 91-105.
13. Jeffrey, B. (2002) Performativity and primary teacher relations, Journal of Education Policy, 17(5), 531-536.
14. Jeffrey, B. & Woods, P. (1995, September 8) Panic on parade, Times Educational Supplement, p. 4.
15. Jeffrey, B. & Woods, P. (1996) Feeling deprofessionalised: the social construction of emotions during an Ofsted inspection, Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 325-341.
16. Johnson, M. (1999) Failing school, failing city: the reality of inner city education (Charlbury, Jon Carpenter).
17. Lonsdale, P. & Parsons, C. (1998) Inspection and the school improvement hoax, in: P. Earley (Ed.) School improvement after inspection? School and LEA responses (London, Paul Chapman), 110-125.
18. Lyotard, J. (1984) The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge (Manchester, Manchester University Press).
19. MacClure, S. (1979) Educational documents: England and Wales 1816 to the present day (London, Methuen).
20. Miller, P. J. (1988) Factories, monitorial schools and Jeremy Bentham: the origins of the 'management syndrome' in popular education, in: A. Westoby (Ed.) Culture and power in educational organisations (Bucks, OUP), 43-55.
21. Neave, G. (1988) On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: an overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1968-1988, European Journal of Education, 23, 7-23.
22. Ofsted (1999) Lessons learned from Ofsted (London, Ofsted).
23. Poulson, L. (1998) Accountability, teacher professionalism and education reform in England, Teacher Development, 2(3), 419-432.
24. Power, M. (1994) The audit explosion (London, Demos).
25. Rea, J. & Weiner, G. (1998) Cultures of blame and redemption. When empowerment becomes control: practitioners' views of the effective schools movement, in: R. Slee, G. Weiner & S. Tomlinson (Eds) School effectiveness for whom? (London, Falmer).
26. Sammons, P., Hillman, J. & Mortimore, P. (1995) Key characteristics of effective schools; a review of school effectiveness research (London, Institute of Education).
27. Slee, R., Weiner, G. & Tomlinson, S. (1998) School effectiveness for whom? (London, Falmer Press).
28. Smart, B. (2002) Michel Foucault (London, Routledge).
29. Tomlinson, S. (2001) Education in a post-welfare society (Buckingham, OUP).
30. Wilcox, B. & Gray, J. (1996) Inspecting schools; holding schools to account and helping schools to improve (Buckingham, OUP).
31. Winch, C. (1997) Accountability, controversy and school effectiveness research, in: J. White & M. Barber (Eds) Perspectives on school effectiveness and school improvement (London, Bedford Way Press).