Student evaluation in co-operative learning: Teacher cognitions

Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 299-316

  Ross, John A ^a,b   Rolheiser, Carol ^a   Hogaboam Gray, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b OISE/UT Trent Valley Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039055485     PISSN: 13540602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1354060980040207     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. ANDERSON, J. (1989) Evaluation of student achievement: teacher practices and educational measurement, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 35, pp. 123-133.
2. ANDERSON, S., ROLHEISER, C. & BENNETT, B. (1995) Confronting the challenge of implementing cooperative learning, Journal of Staff Development, 16, pp. 32-38.
3. APPLE, M. (1986) Teachers and Texts: a political economy of class and gender relations in education (New York, Routledge).
4. ARCHER-KATJ, J., JOHNSON, D. & JOHNSON, R. (1995) Individual versus group feedback in cooperative groups, Journal of Social Psychology, 134, pp. 681-694.
5. ARTER, J., SPANDEL, V., CULHAM, R. & POLLARD, J. (1994) The impact of training students to be self-assessors of writing, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April.
6. BANDURA, A. (1993) Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning, Educational Psychologist, 28, pp. 117-148.
7. BARON, J. (1990) Performance assessment: blurring the edges among assessment, curriculum and instruction, in: A. CHAMPAGNE, B. LOVITTS & B. CALINGER (Eds) Assessment in the Service of Instruction, pp. 127-148 (Washington, DC, American Association for the Advancement of Science).
8. BATESON, D. (1994) Psychometric and philosophical problems in "authentic" assessment: performance tasks and portfolios, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 40, pp. 233-245.
9. BELLANCA, J. & BERMAN, S. (1994) How to grade the thoughtful, cooperative classroom (if you must), paper presented at the International Conference on Cooperative Learning, Portland.
10. BENNETT, B., ROLHEISER, C. & STEVAHN, L. (1991) Cooperative Learning: where heart meets mind (Toronto, Educational Connections).
11. BENNETT, S., WRAGG, E., CARRÉ, C. & CARTER, D. (1992) A longitudinal study of primary teachers' perceived competence in, and concerns about, National Curriculum Implementation, Research Papers in Education, 7, pp. 53-78.
12. BILLINGTON, R. (1994) Effects of collaborative test taking on retention in eight third-grade mathematics classes, Elementary School Journal, 95, pp. 23-31.
13. BRISCOE, C. (1991) The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: a case study of teacher change, Science Education, 75, pp. 185-199.
14. BRISCOE, C. (1994) Making the grade: perspectives on a teacher's assessment practices, Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 7, pp. 14-16, 21-25.
15. CALFEE, R. & PERFUMO, P. (1993) Student portfolios: opportunities for a revolution in assessment, Journal of Reading, 36, pp. 532-537.
16. CONWAY, R., KEMBER, D., SIVAN, A. & WU, M. (1993) Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, pp. 45-54.
17. COX, K. (1995) What counts in an English class? Selected findings from a statewide study of California high school teachers, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April.
18. DRASS, K. (1986) Tap 1.0: text analysis package (Dallas, TX, Mimeo).
19. FALL, R., WEBB, N. & WISE, N. (1995) Group discussion and large-scale language arts assessment: effects on students' comprehension, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
20. FREDERICKSEN, J. & COLLINS, A. (1989) A systems approach to educational testing, Educational Researcher, 18, pp. 27-32.
21. GARCIA, G. & PEARSON, P. (1994) Assessment and diversity, in: L. DARLING-HAMMOND (Ed.) Review of Research in Education, Vol. 20, pp. 337-339 (Washington, DC, American Educational Research Association).
22. GRIFFIN, M., MCCOWN, R., QUINN, G. & DRISCOLL, M. (1994) Learning through testing: an investigation of cooperative assessment, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
23. GRIFFIN, M., GRIFFIN, B., WARKENTIN, R., QUINN, G., DRISCOLL, M. & MCCOWN, R. (1995) The effects of cooperative assessment on goals, perceived ability, self-regulation and achievement, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
24. GULLICKSON, A. (1986) Teacher education and teacher-perceived needs in educational measurement and evaluation, Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, pp. 347-354.
25. HARGREAVES, A. (1994) Changing Teachers, Changing Times: teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age (Toronto, OISE Press).
26. HENRY, D. (1994) Whole Language Students with Low Self-direction: a self-assessment tool, ERIC ED 372 359 (Virginia, University of Virginia).
27. HERMAN, J. & DORR-BREMME, D. (1983) Uses of testing in the schools: a national profile, in: W. HATHAWAY (Ed.) New Directions for Testing & Measurement: Vol. 19. Testing in the schools (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass).
28. HOWELL, K., BIGELOW, S. & EVOY, A. (1993) A qualitative examination of an authentic assessment, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
29. HUBER, G. & EPPLER, R. (1990) Team learning in German classrooms: processes and outcomes, in: S. SHARAN (Ed.) Cooperative Learning: theory and research, pp. 151-171 (New York, Praeger).
30. HUGHES, B., SULLIVAN, H. & MOSLEY, M. (1985) External evaluation, task difficulty, and continuing motivation, Journal of Educational Research, 78, pp. 210-215.
31. IMPARA, J., PLAKE, B. & FAGAR, J. (1993) Teachers' assessment background and attitudes toward testing, Theory into Practice, 32, pp. 113-117.
32. JOHNSON, D., JOHNSON, R. & STANNE, M. (1990) Impact of goal and resource interdependence on problem-solving success, Journal of Social Psychology, 129, pp. 621-629.
33. JOHNSON, D., JOHNSON, R., STANNE, M. & GARIBALDI, A. (1990) Impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups, Journal of Social Psychology, 130, pp. 507-516.
34. LAMBIOTTE, J. G., DANSEREAU, D. F., ROCKLIN, T., FLETCHER, B., HYTHECKER, V., LARSON, C. & O'DONNELL, A. (1987) Cooperative learning and test-taking: transfer of skills. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, pp. 52-61.
35. LINN, R. (1994) Performance assessment: policy, promises and technical measurement standards, Educational Researcher, 23, pp. 4-14.
36. LINN, R., BAKER, E. & DUNBAR, S. (1991) Complex performance-based assessment: expectations and validation criteria, Educational Researcher, 20(8), pp. 15-21.
37. LORSBACH, A., TOBIN, K., BRISCOE, C. & LAMASTER, S. (1992) An interpretation of assessment methods in middle school science, International Journal of Science Education, 14, pp. 305-317.
38. MAUDAUS, G. & KELLAGHAN, T. (1993) The British experience with "authentic" testing, Phi Delta Kappan, 74, pp. 458-469.
39. MAEHR, M. & STALLINGS, R. (1972) Freedom from external evaluation, Child Development, 43, pp. 177-185.
40. MARSO, R. & PIGGE, F. (1972) A summary of published research: Classroom teachers' knowledge and skills related to the development and use of teacher-made tests, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
41. OOSTERHOF, A. (1995) An extended observation of assessment procedures used by selected public school teachers, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April.
42. RAIZEN, S. & KASER, J. (1989) Assessing science learning in elementary school: what, why, and how?, Phi Delta Kappan, 70, pp. 718-722.
43. ROSS, J. A. (1995a) Effects of feedback on student behavior in cooperative learning groups in a grade 7 math class, Elementary School Journal, 96, pp. 125-143.
44. ROSS, J. A. (1995b) Strategies for enhancing teachers' beliefs in their effectiveness: research on a school improvement hypothesis, Teachers College Record, 97, pp. 227-251.
45. ROSS, J. A. & REGAN, E. (1993) Sharing professional experience: its impact on professional development, Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, pp. 91-106.
46. ROSS, J. A., COUSINS, J. B. & GADALLA, T. (1996a) Within-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy, Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, pp. 385-400.
47. ROSS, J. A., ROLHEISER, C. & HOGABOAM-GRAY, A. (1996b) Teaching students how to self-evaluate when working cooperatively, paper to presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
48. RUIZ-PRIMO, M. & SHAVELSON, R. (1995) Rhetoric and reality in science performance assessments: an update, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April.
49. SHAVELSON, R., BAXTER, G. & PINE, J. (1992) Performance assessments: political rhetoric and measurement reality, Educational Researcher, 21, pp. 22-27.
50. WEBB, N. (1993) Collaborative group versus individual assessment in mathematics: processes and outcomes, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
51. WEBB, N., NEMER, K. & CHIZHIK, A. (1995) Using group collaboration as a window into students' cognitive processes, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April.
52. WIGGINS, G. (1993) Assessing Student Performance: explore the purpose and limits of testing (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass).
53. WILSON, R. (1990) Classroom processes in evaluating student achievement, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 36, pp. 4-17.
54. WILSON, R. (1992) The context of classroom processes in evaluating students, in: D. BATESON (Ed.) Classroom Testing in Canada, pp. 3-10 (Vancouver, BC, University of British Columbia).
55. WORTHEN, B. (1993) Critical issues that will determine the future of alternate assessment, Phi Delta Kappan, 74, pp. 444-457.