The share of human genomic DNA under selection estimated from human-mouse genomic aligmnents

Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

Volumn 68, Issue , 2003, Pages 245-254

  Chiaromonte, F ^a   Weber, R J ^b   Roskin, K M ^b   Diekhans, M ^b   Kent, W J ^b   Haussler, D ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; GENE ACTIVITY; GENE FUNCTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENOMICS; MAMMAL; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; KERNEL METHOD; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PSEUDOGENE; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

MAMMALIA;

GENOMIC DNA;

EID: 2442555497     PISSN: 00917451     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1101/sqb.2003.68.245     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Bernardi G. 1993. The isochore organization of the human genome and its evolutionary history: A review. Gene 135: 57.
2. Efron B., Tibshirani R., Storey J., and Tusher V. 2001. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96: 1151.
3. Elnitski L., Hardison R., Li J., Yang S., Kolbe D., Eswara P., O'Connor M., Schwartz S., Miller W., and Chiaromonte F. 2003. Distinguishing regulatory DNA from neutral sites. Genome Res. 13: 64.
4. Hardison R., Roskin K., Yang S., Diekhans M., Kent W., Weber R., Elnitski L., Li J., O'Connor M., Kolbe D., Schwartz S., Furey T.S., Whelan S., Goldman N., Smit A., Miller W., Chiaromonte F., and Haussler D. 2003. Co-variation in frequencies of substitution, deletion, transposition and recombination during eutherian evolution. Genome Res. 13: 13.
5. Holmes I. and Durbin R. 1998. Dynamic programming alignment accuracy. J. Comput. Biol. 5: 493.
6. Ihaka R. and Gentlman R. 1996. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5: 299.
7. Kent W.J. 2002. BLAT: The BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 12: 656.
8. Kent W.J., Baertsch R., Hinrichs A., Miller W., and Haussler D. 2003. Evolution's cauldron: Duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 11484.
9. Kent W.J., Sugnet C., Furey T., Roskin K., Pringle T., Zahler A., and Haussler D. 2002. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12: 996.
10. Lander E.S., Linton L.M., Birren B., Nusbaum C., Zody M.C., Baldwin J., Devon K., Dewar K., Doyle M., FitzHugh W., Funke R., Gage D., Harris K., Heaford A., Howland J., Kann L., Lehoczky J., LeVine R., McEwan P., McKernan K., Meldrim J., Mesirov J.P., Miranda C., Morris W., and Naylor J., et al. (International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium). 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409: 860.
11. Lindsay B.G. 1995. Mixture models: Theory, geometry and applications (NFS-CBMS Regional Conference Series in Probability and Statistics), vol. 5. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, Virginia.
12. McLachlan G.J. and Peel D. 2000. Finite mixture models. Wiley, New York.
13. Pruitt K. and Maglott D. 2001. RefSeq and LocusLink: NCBI gene-centered resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: 137.
14. Roskin K.M., Diekhans M., and Haussler D. 2003. Scoring two-species local alignments to try to statistically separate neutrally evolving from selected DNA segments. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB 2003), p. 257.
15. Roskin K., Diekhans M., Kent W., and Haussler D. 2002. Score functions for assessing conservation in locally aligned regions of DNA from two species. UCSC Technical Report CRL-02-30, September 14, 2002. Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, Baskin Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz.
16. Schwartz S., Kent W., Smit A., Zhang Z., Baertsch R., Hardison R., Haussler D., and Miller W. 2003. Human-mouse alignments with Blastz. Genome Res. 13: 103.
17. Silverman B. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom.
18. Venter J.C., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., Li P.W., Mural R.J., Sutton G.G., Smith H.O., Yandell M., Evans C.A., Holt R.A., Gocayne J.D., Amanatides P., Ballew R.M., Huson D.H., Wortman J.R., Zhang Q., Kodira C.D., Zheng X.H., Chen L., Skupski M., Subramanian G., Thomas P.D., Zhang J., Gabor Miklos G.L., and Nelson C., et al. 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291: 1304.
19. Waterston R.H., Lindblad-Toh K., Birney E., Rogers J., Abril J.F., Agarwal P., Agarwala R., Ainscough R., Alexandersson M., An P., Antonarakis S.E., Attwood J., Baertsch R., Bailey J., Barlow K., Beck S., Berry E., Birren B., Bloom T., Bork P., Botcherby M., Bray N., Brent M.R., Brown D.G., and Brown S.D., et al. (Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium). 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420: 520.
20. Wegman E. 1972. Nonparametric probability density estimation. Technometrics 14: 533.
21. Smit A.F. and Green P. 1999. RepeatMasker. (http://ftp.genome.washington. edu/RM/RepeatMasker.html)