What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement

Journal of College Student Development

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 683-706

  Kuh, George D ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73449142445     PISSN: 08975264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/csd.0.0099     Document Type: Article

References (136)

1. American College Personnel Association (ACPA). (1994). The student learning imperative. Retrieved December 5, 2007, from http://www.myacpa.org/sli- delete/sli.htm
2. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACamp;U). (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Retrieved November 15, 2006, from http://www.greaterexpectations.org
3. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACamp;U). (2005). Liberal education outcomes: A preliminary report on student achievement in college. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACamp;U). (2007). College learning for the new global century: A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America's Promise. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Astin, A. W. (1977). Four critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 25, 297-308.
7. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Astin, A. W. (1999, March/April). Involvement in Learning revisited. Journal of College Student Development. Retrieved May 9, 2008, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi-qa3752/is-199909
9. Astin, A. W., & Lee, J. (2003). How risky are one-shot crosssectional assessments of undergraduate students? Research in Higher Education, 44, 657-672.
10. Astin, A. W., & Sax, L. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39, 251-263.
11. Bandura, A., Millard, M., Peluso, E. A., & Ortman, N. (2000). Effects of peer education training on peer educators: Leadership, self-esteem, health knowledge, and health behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 471-478.
12. Benitez, M. (1998). Hispanic-serving institutions: Challenges and opportunities. New Directions for Higher Education, 102, 57-68.
13. Bensimon, E. M. (2007). The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success. Review of Higher Education, 30, 441-469,
14. Berger, J. B., & Milem, J. F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40, 641-664.
15. Beyer, S. (1999). Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectancies and evaluations. Sex Roles, 41, 279-296.
16. Beyer, S. (2002). The effects of gender, dysphoria, and performance feedback on the accuracy of self-evaluations. Sex Roles, 47, 453-464.
17. Beyer, S., & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in selfperceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157-172.
18. Blimling, G. S., Whitt, E. J., & Associates (1999). Good practice in student affairs: Principles to foster student learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Borden, V. M. H., & Pike, G. R. (Eds.). (2008). Assessing and accounting for student learning: Beyond the Spellings Commission. New Directions for Institutional Research Assessment Supplement 2007. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Boyd, M. K., & Wesemann, J. L. (Eds.). ( 2009). Broadening participation in undergraduate research: Fostering excellence and enhancing the impact. Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.
21. Braxton, J. M., Hirschy, A. S., & McClendon, S. A. (2004). Understanding and reducing college student departure. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report, Vol.30, No.3. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, The George Washington University.
22. Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto's theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 569-590.
23. Bridges, B.K., Kinzie, J., Nelson Laird, T.F., & Kuh, G.D. (2008). Student engagement and student success at minority serving institutions. In M. Gasman, B. Baez, and C.S. Turner (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to understanding minority institutions. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
24. Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47, 1-32.
25. Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2009). Imagine success: Engaging entering students (2008 SENSE field test findings). Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin, Community College Leadership Program.
26. Chen, D. P., Gonyea, R. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2008). Learning at a distance: Engaged or not? Innovate: Journal of Online Education [serial online], 4(3). Retrieved from http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id= 438&action=login
27. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, March, 3-7.
28. Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Coates, H. (2008). 2008 Australasian student engagement report. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
30. Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). (2006). Act on fact: Using data to improve student success. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, Community College Leadership Program.
31. Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). (2007). Committing to student engagement: Reflections on CCSSE's first five years. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, Community College Leadership Program.
32. Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). (2008). High expectations and high support: Essential elements of engagement. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, Community College Leadership Program.
33. Cruce, T., Wolniak, G. C., Seifert, T. A., & Pascarella, E. T. (2006). Impacts of good practices on cognitive development, learning orientations, and graduate degree plans during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 365-383.
34. Education Commission of the States. ( 1995). Making quality count in undergraduate education. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
35. Ethington, C. A., Thomas, S. L., & Pike, G. R. (2002). Back to the basics: Regression as it should be. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 17, pp. 267-287). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
36. Ewell, P. T. (2008). US accreditation and the future of quality assurance: A tenth anniversary report from the Council on Higher Education Accreditation. Washington, DC: CHEA Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and Quality Assurance.
37. Ewell, P. T., & Jones, D. P. (1996). Indicators of "good practice" in undergraduate education: A handbook for development and implementation. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
38. Gellin, A. (2003). The effect of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta-analysis of the literature, 1991-2000. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 746-762.
39. Gonyea, R.M. (2008, November). The impact of study abroad on senior year engagement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville, FL.
40. Gonyea, R.M. & Kuh, G.D. (2009). Using NSSE in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, No 141. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Gonyea, R. M., Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. Cruce, T., & Nelson Laird, T. (2006, November). The influence of high school engagement and pre-college expectations on first-year student engagement and self-reported learning outcomes at liberal arts institutions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Anaheim, California.
42. Gordon, J., Ludlum, J., & Hoey, J.J. (2006, May). Validating the National Survey of Student Engagement against student outcomes: Are they related? Paper present at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL.
43. Greene, T. G., Marti, C. N., & McClenney, K. (2008). The effort-outcome gap: Differences for African-American and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and academic achievement. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 513-539.
44. Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2008). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. London: Routledge.
45. Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influence of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43, 555-576.
46. Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2003). A learning productivity model for estimating student gains during college. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 185-203.
47. Huang, G., Taddese, N., & Walter, E. (2000). Entry and persistence of women and minorities in college science and engineering education. Report No. NCES 2000-601. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
48. Hurtado, S. (2007). The sociology of the study of college impact. In P. Gumport (Ed.), The sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
49. Hurtado, S., Dey, E. L., Gurin, P. Y., & Gurin, G. (2003). College environments, diversity, and student learning. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVIII, pp. 145-189). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
50. Inkelas, K. K., & Weisman, J. L. (2003). Different by design: An examination of student outcomes among participants in three types of living-learning programs. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 335-368.
51. Inkelas, K. K., Brower, A. M., Crawford, S., Hummel, M., Pope, D., & Zeller, W. L. (2004). National Study of Living-Learning Programs: 2004 report of findings. Retrieved July 11, 2009, from http://www.livelearnstudy.net/images/ NSLLP-2004-Final-Report.pdf
52. Joint Task Force on Student Learning. (1998). Powerful partnerships: A shared responsibility for learning. Retrieved from http://www.myacpa.org/pub/ documents/taskforce.pdf
53. Jones, C. E., & Watt, J. D. (1999). Psychosocial development and moral orientation among traditional-aged college students. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 125-132.
54. Keeling, R. P. (Ed.). (2004). Learning reconsidered: A campuswide focus on the student experience. Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators & American College Personnel Association.
55. King, J. E. (1998, May 1). Too many students are holding jobs for too many hours. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A72.
56. Kinzie, J., & Pennipede, B. S. (2009). Converting engagement results into action. In R. Gonyea and G. Kuh (Eds.), Using student engagement data in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, No.141 (pp. 83-96). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57. Kinzie, J., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Going DEEP: Learning from campuses that share responsibility for student success. About Campus, 9(5), 2-8.
58. Kinzie, J. L., Thomas, A. D., Palmer, M. M., Umbach, P. D., & Kuh, G. D. (2007). Women students at coeducational and women's colleges: How do their experiences compare? Journal of College Student Development, 48, 145-165.
59. Klein, S. P., Kuh, G. D., Chun, M., Shavelson, R., & Benjamin, R. (2005). An approach to measuring cognitive outcomes across higher education institutions. Research in Higher Education, 46, 251-276.
60. Kuh, G. D. (1993). In their own words: What students learn outside the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 277-304.
61. Kuh, G. D. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 123-155.
62. Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), 10-17, 66.
63. Kuh, G. D. (2002). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research. Retrieved July 11, 2009, from http://nsse.iub.edu/html/pubs.cfm?action=&viewwhat=Journal%20Article, Book%20Chapter,Report,Research%20Paper
64. Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24-32.
65. Kuh, G. D. (2005). Student engagement in the first year of college. In Upcraft, L. M., Gardner, J. N., & Barefoot, B. O. (Eds.), Challenging and supporting the first-year student. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
66. Kuh, G. D. (2007a). Risky business: Promises and pitfalls of institutional transparency. Change, 39(5), 30-35.
67. Kuh, G. D. (2007b). Success in college. In P. Lingenfelter (Ed.), More student success: A systemic solution. Boulder, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
68. Kuh, G. D. (2008a). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
69. Kuh, G. D. (2008b). Diagnosing why some students don't succeed. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(16), A72.
70. Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In R. Gonyea and G. Kuh (Eds.), Using student engagement data in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, No.141 (pp. 5-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71. Kuh, G. D. (in press). Student success in college: What student affairs can do. In J. Schuh, S. Jones, & S. Harper (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (5th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72. Kuh, G. D., Chen, D. P., & Nelson Laird, T. F. (2007). Why teacher-scholars matter: Some insights from FSSE and NSSE. Liberal Education, 93(4), 40-45.
73. Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 540-563.
74. Kuh, G. D., Gonyea, R. M., & Williams, J. M. (2005). What students expect from college and what they get. In T. Miller, B. Bender, J. Schuh, & Associates, Promoting reasonable expectations: Aligning student and institutional thinking about the college experience. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
75. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
76. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
77. Kuh, G. D., & Pascarella, E. T. (2004).What does institutional selectivity tell us about educational quality? Change, 36(5), 52-58.
78. Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and personal development outside the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
79. Liddell, D. L., & Davis, T. L. (1996). The measure of moral orientation: Reliability and validity evidence. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 485-493.
80. Lewin, R. (Ed.), (2009). The handbook of practice and research in student abroad: Higher education and quest for global citizenship. New York: Routledge and Association of American Colleges and Universities.
81. McClenney, K., Marti, C. N., & Adkins, C. (2006). Student engagement and student outcomes: Key findings from CCSSE validation research. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, Community College Leadership Program.
82. McCormick, A. M. (2009). Toward reflective accountability: Using NSSE for accountability and transparency. In R. Gonyea & G. Kuh (Eds.), Using student engagement data in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, No.141 (pp. 97-106). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
83. McCormick, A. C., Moore, J. V., III, & Kuh, G. D. (In press). Working in college: Its relationship to student engagement and educational outcomes. In L.W. Perna (Ed.), Understand the working college student: Implications for policy, administrators, academic affairs, and institutional support. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
84. McPherson, P., & Shulenburger, D. (2006, August). Toward a public universities and colleges Voluntary System of Accountability for undergraduate education (VSA): A NASULGC and AASCU discussion draft. Washington, DC: NASULGC.
85. Manning, K., Kinzie, J. & Schuh, J. H. (2006). One size does not fit all: Traditional and innovative models of student affairs practice. New York: Routledge.
86. Merwin, J. C. (1969). Historical review of changing concepts of evaluation. In R.L. Tyler (Ed.), Educational evaluation: New roles, new methods. The 68th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
87. Miller, T., Bender, B. Schuh, J. H., & Associates (2005). Promoting reasonable expectations: Aligning student and institutional thinking about the college experience. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
88. National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges. (1997). Returning to our roots: The student experience. Washington, DC: Author.
89. National Commission on the Future of Higher Education. ( 2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/ about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/final-report.pdf
90. National Institute of Education. (1984). Involvement in learning. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
91. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2000). The NSSE 2000 Report: National benchmarks of effective educational practice. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
92. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2001). Improving the college experience: National benchmarks for effective educational practice. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
93. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2002). From promise to progress: How colleges and universities are using student engagement results to improve collegiate quality. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
94. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2003). Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
95. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2004). Student engagement: Pathways to collegiate success. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
96. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2005). Student engagement: Exploring different dimensions of student engagement. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
97. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2006). Engaged learning: Fostering success of all students. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
98. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2007). Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
99. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2008). Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within. Bloomington: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
100. Nelson Laird, T.F., Chen, P. D., & Kuh, G. D. (2008). Classroom practices at institutions with higher than expected persistence rates: What student engagement data tell us. In J.M. Braxton (Ed.), The role of the classroom in college student persistence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
101. Nelson Laird, T. F., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 211-233.
102. Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. J. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49, 469-494.
103. Outcalt, C. L., & Skewes-Cox, T. E. (2002). Involvement, interaction, and satisfaction: The human environment at HBCUs. The Review of Higher Education, 25, 331-347.
104. Pace, C. R. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10-16.
105. Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences. An account of the development and use of the college student experiences questionnaire. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.
106. Pace, C. R. (1990). The undergraduates: A report of their activities and college experiences in the 1980s. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA Graduate School of Education.
107. Pascarella, E. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol.1 (pp.1-62). New York: Agathon.
108. Pascarella, E. T. (2001). Using student self-reported gains to estimate college impact: A cautionary tale. Journal of College Student Development, 42, 488-492.
109. Pascarella, E. T., Cruce, T., Wolniak, G. C., Kuh, G. D., Umbach, P. D., Hayek, J. C., et al. (2006). Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 251-285.
110. Pascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Blaich, C. (2009). Validation of the NSSE Benchmarks and deep approaches to learning against liberal arts outcomes. Iowa City: University of Iowa Center for Research on Undergraduate Education.
111. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
112. Pike, G. R. (2003). Membership in a fraternity or sorority, student engagement, and educational outcomes at AAU public research universities. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 369-382.
113. Pike, G. R. (2006a). The dependability of NSSE scalets for college and department-level assessment. Research in Higher Education, 47, 177-195.
114. Pike, G. R. (2006b). The convergent and discriminant validity of NSSE scalet scores. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 551-564.
115. Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). First-and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 276-300.
116. Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2006). Relationships among structural diversity, informal peer interactions and perceptions of the campus environment. Review of Higher Education, 29, 425-450.
117. Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2003). The relationship between institutional mission and students' involvement and educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 44, 241-261.
118. Pike, G.R., Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2007). Evaluating the rationale for affirmative action in college admissions: Direct and indirect relationships between campus diversity and gains in understanding diverse groups. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 166-182.
119. Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & McCormick, A. M. (2008, November). Direct, indirect, and contingent relationships between participating in a learning community and educational outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville, Florida.
120. Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., McCormick, A. C., & Ethington, C. A. (2007). If and when money matters: Direct and indirect relationships between expenditures and student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Louisville, KY.
121. Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & McKinley, R. (2009). Firstyear students' employment, engagement, and academic achievement: Untangling the relationship between work and grades. NASPA Journal, 45, 560-582.
122. Pike, G. R., Smart, J. C., Kuh, G. D., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter? Research in Higher Education, 47, 847-992.
123. Spade, J. Z., & Reese, C. A. (1991). We've come a long way, maybe: College students' plans for work and family. Sex Roles, 24, 309-321.
124. Strydom, J. F., Mentz, M., & Kuh, G. D. (in press). Maximising success in higher education: The case for student engagement in South Africa. Acta Academica.
125. Swaner, L. E., & Brownell, J. E. (2009). Outcomes of high impact practices for underserved students: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
126. Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
127. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
128. Umbach, P.D., & Kuh, G.D. (2006). Student experiences with diversity at liberal arts colleges: Another claim for distinctiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 169-192.
129. Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 153-184.
130. Upcraft, L. M., Gardner, J. N., & Barefoot, B. O. (Eds.). (2005). Challenging and supporting the first-year student. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
131. Watterson, B. (1992, March 30). Calvin and Hobbs. Universal Press Syndicate.
132. Wingspread Group on Higher Education. ( 1993). An American imperative: Higher expectations for higher education. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation.
133. Wolf-Wendel, L., Ward, K., & Kinzie, J. (2009). A tangled web of terms: The overlap and unique contribution of involvement, engagement, and integration to understanding college student success. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 407-428.
134. Zhao, C-M., Carini, R. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). Searching for the peach blossom Shangri-la: Student engagement of men and women SMET majors. Review of Higher Education, 28, 503-525.
135. Zhao, C-M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115-138.
136. Zhao, C-M., Kuh, G. D., & Carini, R. M. (2005). A comparison of international student and American student engagement in effective educational practices. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 209-231.