Evidence of misunderstandings in tutorial dialogue and their impact on learning

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 125-132

  Jordan, Pamela ^a   Litman, Diane ^a,b   Lipschultz, Michael ^b   Drummond, Joanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

Author keywords

Dialogue systems; Misunderstandings; Tutorial dialogue

Indexed keywords

SPEECH PROCESSING;

DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; MISUNDERSTANDING; REPAIR STRATEGY; SYSTEM DEVELOPERS; TUTORIAL DIALOG;

REPAIR;

EID: 73149124531     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-028-5-125     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. R. J. Calistri-Yeh. Utilizing user models to handle ambiguity and misconceptions in robust plan recognition. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1(4):289-322, 1991.
2. M. Evens and J. Michael. One-on-One Tutoring by Humans and Computers. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2006.
3. K. Forbes-Riley, D. Litman, and M. Rotaru. Responding to student uncertainty during computer tutoring: An experimental evaluation. In Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference (ITS 2008), pages 60-69, 2008.
4. G. Hirst, S. McRoy, P. Heeman, P. Edmonds, and D. Horton. Repairing conversational misunderstandings and non-understandings. Speech Communication, 15(3-4):213-229, 1994.
5. H. Horacek and M. Wolska. Interpreting semi-formal utterances in dialogs about mathematical proofs. In F. Meziane and E. Métais, editors, Natural Language Processing and Information Systems, volume 3136 of LNCS, pages 26-38. Springer, 2004.
6. P. Jordan and R. Thomason. Refining the categories of miscommunication. In Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Detecting, Repairing, and Preventing Human-machine Miscommunication, CA, 1996. AAAI Press.
7. P. W. Jordan, B. Hall, M. Ringenberg, Y. Cui, and C.P. Rosé. Tools for authoring a dialogue agent that participates in learning studies. In Proceedings of AIED 2007, pages 43-50, 2007.
8. H.C. Lane. Natural Language Tutoring and the Novice Programmer. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Computer Science, 2004.
9. D. J. Litman, C. P. Rosé, K. Forbes-Riley, K. VanLehn, D. Bhembe, and S. Silliman. Spoken versus typed human and computer dialogue tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16:145-170, 2006.
10. M. Makatchev, P. Jordan, and K. VanLehn. Abductive theorem proving for analyzing student explanations to guide feedback in intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of Automated Reasoning, Special issue on Automated Reasoning and Theorem Proving in Education, 32:187-226, 2004.
11. H. Pon-Barry, K. Schultz, E.O. Bratt, B. Clark, and S. Peters. Responding to student uncertainty in spoken tutorial dialogue systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(2):171-194, 2006.
12. M. Rotaru and D. Litman. Dependencies between student state and speech recognition problems in spoken tutoring dialogues. In Proceedings of Coling/ACL, Sydney, Australia, 2006.
13. G. Skantze. Exploring human error recovery strategies: Implications for spoken dialogue systems. Speech Communication, 45:325-341, 2005.
14. K. VanLehn. The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 16, 2006.
15. K. VanLehn, P. Jordan, and D. Litman. Developing pedagogically effective tutorial dialogue tactics: Experiments and a testbed. In Proceedings of SLaTE Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education, 2007.