The strategic role of the board: The impact of board structure on top management team strategic action capability

Corporate Governance: An International Review

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 728-743

  Kim, Bongjin ^a   Burns, Michael L ^b   Prescott, John E ^c  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate Governance; Environmental Dynamism and Complexity; The Board's Strategic Role; Top Management Team Strategic Capability

Indexed keywords

EID: 73149118443     PISSN: 09648410     EISSN: 14678683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00775.x     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. Anderson, D., Melanson, S. Maly, J. 2007. The evolution of corporate governance: Power redistribution brings boards to life. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 780 797.
2. Anderson, J., Jolly, L. Fairhurst, A. 2007. Customer relationship management in retailing: A content analysis of retail trade journals. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14: 394 399.
3. Anderson, P. Tushman, M. L. 2001. Organizational environments and industry exit: The effects of uncertainty, munificence and complexity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10: 675 711.
4. Ansón, S. G. Madurga, J. B. 2006. Indra: The history of a successful privatization. In C. A. Mallin (Ed. International corporate governance: A case study approach: 82 103. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
5. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. Kalleberg, A. 2000. Manufacturing advantage. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University ILR Press.
6. Ashby, W. R. 1956. An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.
7. Barkema, H. G. Shvyrkov, O. 2007. Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion? Strategic Management Journal, 28: 663 680.
8. Batt, R. 2000. Strategic segmentation in front-line services: Matching customers, employees, and human resource systems. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11: 540 561.
9. Baum, J. A. C. Korn, H. J. 1996. Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 255 291.
10. Baum, J. A. C. Wally, S. 2003. Strategic decision speed and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 1107 1129.
11. Baysinger, B. D. Butler, H. 1985. Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations, 1: 101 124.
12. Baysinger, B. D. Hoskisson, R. E. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15: 72 87.
13. Boonstra, J. J. Gravenhorst, K. M. B. 1998. Power dynamics and organizational change: A comparison of perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7: 97 120.
14. Boyd, B. K. 1995. CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 301 312.
15. Brickley, J., Coles, J. Jarrell, G. 1997. Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3: 189 220.
16. Bump, J. A. 2004. Knowledge transfer: Why and how at CEMEX. Cement Industry Technical Conference #46, April 25, 2004, Chatanooga, TN, 227 233.
17. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A. Sanders, W. G. 2004. Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30: 749 778.
18. Chen, M. J. Hambrick, D. 1995. Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 453 482.
19. Chen, M. J. MacMillan, I. C. 1992. Nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves: The roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 539 570.
20. Chen, M. J. Miller, D. 1994. Competitive attack, retaliation, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 85 102.
21. Child, J. 1972. Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6: 1 22.
22. Christensen, C. M. 1997. The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
23. Conger, J., Lawler, E. Finegold, D. 2001. Corporate boards: Strategies for adding value at the top. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24. Cornforth, C. Edwards, C. 1999. Board roles in the strategic management of non-profit organizations: Theory and practice. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7: 346 362.
25. Cyert, R. March, J. G. 1967. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. D'Aveni, R. A. 1994. Hypercompetitive rivalries: Competing in highly dynamic environments. New York, NY: Free Press.
27. Daily, C. M. Dalton, D. R. 1994. Corporate governance and the bankrupt firm. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 643 654.
28. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R. Cannella, A. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28: 371 382.
29. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E. Johnson, J. L. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 269 390.
30. Daum, J. H., Neff, T. Norris, J. C. 2006. A closer look at lead and presiding directors. Cornerstone of the Board: The New Governance Committee, 1 (4 1 20.
31. Davies, A. 1999. A strategic approach to corporate governance. Burlington, VT: Gower Publishing Ltd.
32. Davies, A. 2006. Best practice in corporate governance: Building reputation and sustainable success. Burlington, VT: Gower Publishing Ltd.
33. Delmas, M. Tokat, Y. 2005. Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: The US electric utility sector. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 441 460.
34. Derfus, P. J., Maggitti, P. G., Grimm, C. M. Smith, K. G. 2008. The red queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 61 80.
35. Dess, G. G. Beard, G. 1984. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 52 73.
36. Deutsch, Y. 2005. The impact of board composition on firm's critical decisions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 31: 424 444.
37. Dimma, W. A. 1997. Corporate governance. Executive Excellence, 14: 7 9.
38. Donaldson, L. Davis, J. H. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16: 49 64.
39. Dooley, R. S., Fryxell, G. E. Judge, W. Q. 2000. Belaboring the not-so-obvious: consensus, commitment, and strategy implementation speed and success. Journal of Management, 26: 1237 1257.
40. Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 543 576.
41. Eisenhardt, K. 2001. Speed and strategic choice: How managers accelerate decision making. California Management Review, 50: 102 116.
42. Eisenhardt, K. Bourgeois, L. J. 1988. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 737 770.
43. Erhardt, N., Werbel, J. Schrader, C. 2003. Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11: 102 111.
44. Filatotchev, I. Toms, S. 2003. Corporate governance, strategy and survival in a declining industry: A study of UK cotton textile companies. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 895 920.
45. Fine, C. H. 1998. Clockspeed: Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
46. Finkelstein, S. D'Aveni, R. A. 1994. CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1079 1108.
47. Finkelstein, S. Hambrick, D. C. 1989. Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 121 134.
48. Finkelstein, S. Hambrick, D. C. 1990. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 484 503.
49. Finkelstein, S. Hambrick, D. C. 1996. Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
50. Forbes, D. Milliken, F. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24: 489 505.
51. Fredrickson, J. W. Mitchell, T. 1984. Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 399 423.
52. Gilles, J. 2006. The Northern Russia Electric Company case: To whom is the director-general accountable: The company, the board of directors, or the controlling shareholder? In C. A. Mallin (Ed. International corporate governance: A case study approach: 145 159. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
53. Golden, B. R. Zajac, E. J. 2001. When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 1087 1111.
54. Goodstein, J., Gautam, K. Boeker, W. 1994. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 241 250.
55. Hambrick, D. C. D'Aveni, R. A. 1992. Top management team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large bankruptcies. Management Science, 38: 1445 1466.
56. Hambrick, D. C. Finkelstein, S. 1987. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. In L. L. Cummings B. M. Staw (Eds. Research in organizational behavior: 369 406. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
57. Hambrick, D. C. Mason, P. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193 206.
58. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S. Chen, M. J. 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 659 684.
59. Helmer, H. W. 1996. A director's role in strategy. Directors and Boards, 20: 22 25.
60. Hendry, K. Kiel, G. 2004. The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organizational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12: 500 520.
61. Hillman, A. J. Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28: 383 396.
62. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A. Harris, A. 2002. Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28: 747 763.
63. Ingley, C. Van Der Walt, N. 2001. The strategic board: The changing role of directors in developing and maintaining corporate capability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9: 174 185.
64. Janis, I. 1982. Victims of groupthink (revised edition). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
65. Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48 (3 831 880.
66. Jensen, M. C. Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305 360.
67. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M. Ellstrand, A. E. 1996. Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22: 409 438.
68. Judge, W. Q. 2009. Editorial-Toward a global theory of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: iii iv.
69. Judge, W. Q. Miller, A. 1991. Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 449 463.
70. Judge, W. Q. Zeithaml, C. P. 1992. Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 766 794.
71. Kang, E. 2006. Investors perceptions of managerial opportunism in corporate acquisitions: The moderating role of environmental conditions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14: 377 387.
72. Kauer, D., Prinzessin Zu Waldeck, T. C. Schäffer, U. 2007. Effects of top management team characteristics on strategic decision making: Shifting attention to team member personalities and mediating processes. Management Decision, 45: 942 967.
73. Khanna, T., Gulati, R. Nohria, N. 2000. The economic modeling of strategy process: "Clean models" and "dirty hands." Strategic Management Journal, 21: 781 790.
74. Khoza, R. Adam, M. 2006. The structure and governance of Eskom-A case study. In C. A. Mallin (Ed. International corporate governance: A case study approach: 284 308. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
75. Kole, S. R. Lehn, K. 1999. Deregulation and the adaptation of governance structure: The case of the US airline industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 52: 89 117.
76. Kosnik, R. D. 1990. Effects of board demography and directors' incentives on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 129 150.
77. Lavelle, L. 2002. The best and worst boards. Business Week, 7: 104 114.
78. Lawrence, P. Lorsch, J. 1967. Organization and environment. Boston: Harvard University Press.
79. Leinster, C. 2004. Questions, answers, and more questions. Corporate Board Member, 7 (Special Issue 10.
80. Liberman, M. B. Montgomery, C. B. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 41 58.
81. Lumpkin, G. T. Dess, G. G. 1995. Simplicity as a strategy-making process: The effects of stage of organizational development and environment on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1386 1407.
82. Lumpkin, G. T. Dess, G. G. 2001. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 429 451.
83. Luo, Y. 2007. Global dimensions of corporate governance. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
84. Mace, M. 1971. Directors: Myth and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85. MacMillan, I. C. 1988. Controlling competitive dynamics by taking strategic initiatives. The Academy of Management Executive, 2: 111 118.
86. McNulty, T. Pettigrew, A. 1999. Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20: 47 74.
87. Milar, C., Eldomiaty, T., Choi, C. Hilton, B. 2005. Corporate governance and institutional transparency in emerging markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 59: 163 174.
88. Miller, D. 1993. The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 116 138.
89. Miller, D. Chen, M. J. 1996. The simplicity of competitive repertoires: An empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 419 439.
90. Miller, D. Friesen, P. H. 1977. Strategy making in context: Ten empirical archetypes. Journal of Management Studies, 14: 251 260.
91. Miller, D. Friesen, P. H. 1983. Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4: 221 235.
92. Milliken, F. J. Martins, L. 1996. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21: 402 434.
93. Millstein, I. M. 1995. The professional board. Business Lawyer, 50: 1427 1443.
94. Mintzberg, H. Waters, J. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6: 257 272.
95. Nadkarni, S. Narayanan, V. K. 2007. Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 243 270.
96. Nadler, D., Behan, B. Nadler, M. 2006. Building better boards: A blueprint for effective governance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
97. Palia, L., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D. Godiwalla, Y. H. 1982. Grand corporate strategy and critical functions: Interactive effects of organizational dimensions. New York: Preager.
98. Peteraf, M. Reed, R. 2007. Managerial discretion and internal alignment under regulatory constraints and change. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1089 1112.
99. Pettigrew, A. M. 1973. The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock.
100. Pfeffer, J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 218 228.
101. Priem, R. L. Rosenstein, J. 2000. Is organization theory obvious to practitioners? A test of one established theory. Organization Science, 11: 509 524.
102. Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. Volberda, H. 2009. Boards of directors' contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 292 306.
103. Ravasi, D. Zattoni, A. 2006. Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy: A study of mixed-ownership institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1671 1702.
104. Rechner, P. L. Dalton, D. R. 1991. CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 155 160.
105. Reger, R. K., Duhaime, I. M. Stimpert, J. L. 1992. Deregulation, strategic choice, risk, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 189 204.
106. Richard, O. C., Murthi, B. P. Ismail, K. 2007. The impact of racial diversity on intermediate and long-term performance: The moderating role of environmental context. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1213 1233.
107. Rindova, V. 1999. What do corporate boards have to do with strategy: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 36: 953 977.
108. Ruigrok, W., Peck, S. Keller, H. 2006. Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1201 1226.
109. Schmidt, S. M. Brauer, M. 2006. Strategic governance: How to assess board effectiveness in guiding strategy execution. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14: 13 22.
110. Schoonhoven, C. B. 1981. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 349 377.
111. Schweiger, D., Sandberg, W. Ragan, J. 1986. Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 51 71.
112. Shen, W. Cho, T. S. 2005. Exploring involuntary executive turnover through a managerial discretion framework. Academy of Management Review, 30: 843 854.
113. Siciliano, J. I. 2002. Governance and strategy implementation: Expanding the board's involvement. Business Horizons, 45: 33 38.
114. Smith, K. G. Grimm, C. 1991. A communication-information model of competitive response timing. Journal of Management, 17: 5 23.
115. Smith, K. G., Grimm, C., Chen, M. J. Gannon, M. 1989. Predictors of competitive strategic actions: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Business Research, 18: 245 258.
116. Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. Chen, M. J. 1991. Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the US Domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 60 85.
117. Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Wally, S. Young, G. 1997. Strategic groups and rivalrous firm behavior: Towards a reconciliation. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 149 157.
118. Staw, B., Sandelands, L. Dutton, J. 1981. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 582 600.
119. Stevens, J. M., Steensma, H. K., Harrison, D. A. Cochran, P. L. 2005. Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethical codes of conduct on financial executives' decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 181 195.
120. Stiles, P. 2001. The impact of the board on strategy: An empirical examination. Journal of Management Studies, 38: 627 650.
121. Suto, M. Hashimoto, M. 2006. Will the Japanese corporate governance system survive? In C. A. Mallin (Ed. International corporate governance: A case study approac: 246 266. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
122. Talaulicar, T., Grundei, J. Werder, A. V. 2005. Strategic decision making in start-ups: The effect of top management team organization and processes on speed and comprehensiveness. Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 519 541.
123. Tushman, M. Romanelli, E. 1985. Organization evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In B. M. Staw L. L. Cummings (Eds. Research in organizational behavior: 171 232. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
124. US Senate. 2002. The role of the board of directors in Enron's collapse (Report 107-70). Wasington, DC: US Senate.
125. Useem, M. Zelleke, A. 2006. Oversight and delegation in corporate governance: Deciding what the board should decide. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14: 2 12.
126. Van De Ven, A. H. Drazin, R. 1985. Alternate forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 514 539.
127. Van Der Walt, N., Ingley, C., Shergill, G. Townsend, A. 2006. Board configuration: Are diverse boards better boards? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, 6: 129 147.
128. Ward, A. J. Feldman, D. C. 2008. Survival of the embedded: Expelling and embedding forces on members of the corporate elite. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 239 251.
129. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K. Michaelson, L. K. 1993. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 590 602.
130. Westphal, J. D. Fredrickson, J. W. 2001. Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new ceos, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 1113 1137.
131. Westphal, J. D. Milton, L. P. 2000. How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 366 398.
132. Williams, K. O'Rielly, C. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. Staw R. Sutton (Eds. Research in organizational behavior: 77 140. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
133. Zahra, S. A. 1990. Increasing the board's involvement in strategy. Long Range Planning, 23: 109 117.
134. Zajac, E. J. Bazerman, M. 1991. Blind spots in industry and competitor analysis: Implications of interfirm (mis)perceptions for strategic decisions. Academy of Management Review, 16: 37 56.