Features and impacts of five multidisciplinary community-university research partnerships

Health and Social Care in the Community

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 59-69

  King, Gillian ^a   Servais, Michelle ^b   Forchuk, Cheryl ^c   Chalmers, Heather ^d   Currie, Melissa ^a   Law, Mary ^e   Specht, Jacqueline ^c   Rosenbaum, Peter ^e   Willoughby, Teena ^d   Kertoy, Marilyn ^c  

^a Ministry of Children and Youth Services Child and Parent Resource Institute   (Canada)

^b THAMES VALLEY CHILDREN S CENTRE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^d BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alliance; Impact; Partnership; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; COMMUNITY CARE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SOCIAL WORK; UNIVERSITY;

COMMUNICATION; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; ONTARIO; SOCIAL WORK; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 73149108818     PISSN: 09660410     EISSN: 13652524     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00874.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baker E.A., Homan S., Schonhoff R. Kreuter M. (1999) Principles of practice for academic/practice/community research partnerships. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 16, 86 93.
2. Balcazar F.E., Keys C.B., Kaplan D.L. Suarez-Balcazar Y. (1998) Participatory action research and people with disabilities: principles and challenges. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 12, 105 112.
3. Bartunek J., Trullen J., Bonet E. Sauquet A. (2003) Sharing and expanding academic and practitioner knowledge in health care. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 8, S62 S68.
4. Chompalov I., Genuth J. Shrum W. (2002) The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy 31, 749 768.
5. Cohen W.M. Levinthal D.A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128 152.
6. Currie M., King G., Rosenbaum P., Law M., Kertoy M. Specht J. (2005) A model of impacts of research partnerships in health and social services. Evaluation and Program Planning 28, 400 412.
7. Dickinson H. (2006) The evaluation of health and social care partnerships: an analysis of approaches and synthesis for the future. Health and Social Care in the Community 14, 375 383.
8. Ferlie E. Wood M. (2003) Novel mode of knowledge production? Producers and consumers in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 8, S51 S57.
9. Golden-Biddle K., Reay T., Petz S., et al. (2003) Toward a communicative perspective of collaborating in research: the case of the researcher-decision- maker partnership. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 8, S20 S25.
10. Hagedoorn J., Link A.N. Vonortas N.S. (2000) Research partnerships. Research Policy 29, 567 586.
11. Halliday J., Asthana S.N.M. Richardson S. (2004) Evaluating partnership: the role of formal assessment tools. Evaluation 10, 285 303.
12. Hayward L.M., DeMarco R. Lynch M.M. (2000) Interprofessional collaborative alliances: health care educators sharing and learning from each other. Journal of Allied Health 29, 220 226.
13. Huxham C. (1996) Creating Collaborative Advantage. Sage, London.
14. Johnson S.K., Halm M.A., Titler M.G., et al. (1993) Group functioning of a collaborative family research team. Clinical Nurse Specialist 7, 184 191.
15. King G., Law M. Forchuk C., et al. (2003a) The Research Contact Checklist [WWW document]. URL http://www.impactmeasure.org.
16. King G., Servais M. Currie M., et al. (2003b) The Community Impacts of Research Oriented Partnerships (CIROP) Respondent Form [WWW document]. URL http://www.impactmeasure.org.
17. King G., Law M., Rosenbaum P. et al. (2005) Helpful organizational features of a community-linked research unit: a qualitative study. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 3 (3 [WWW document]. URL http://ijahsp.nova.edu/articles/vol3num3/King.htm.
18. King G., Servais M. Kertoy M., et al. (2009) A measure of community members' perceptions of the impacts of research partnerships in health and social services. Evaluation and Program Planning 32 (3 289 299.
19. Landry R., Amara N. Lamari M. (2001) Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy 30, 333 349.
20. Lee S. Bozeman B. (2005) The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science 35, 673 702.
21. Lyall C., Bruce A., Firn J., Firn M. Tait J. (2004) Assessing end-use relevance of public sector research organisations. Research Policy 33, 73 87.
22. Pettigrew A. (1995) Distinguished Scholar Address to the Organization and Management Theory Conference. Division of the US Academy of Management, Vancouver, BC.
23. Rogers J.D. Bozeman B. (2001) 'Knowledge value alliances': an alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 26, 23 55. (Pubitemid 33215050)
24. Schwandt T.A. (2005) The centrality of practice to evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 26, 95 105.
25. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (2008) Measuring impact: weighing the value of social sciences and humanities research. Dialogue Summer, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Ottawa, ON [WWW document]. URL http://www.sshrc.ca/newsletter/2008summer/measuring-impact-e.asp.
26. Stacey R.D. (2001) Complex Responsive Process in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation. Routledge, London.
27. Walter I., Davies H. Nutley S. (2003) Increasing research impact through partnerships: evidence from outside health care. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 8, S58 S61.
28. Youtie J., Libaers D. Bozeman B. (2006) Institutionalization of university research centers: the case of the national cooperative program in infertility reseach. Technovation 26, 1055 1063.
29. Zuckerman H.S., Kaluzny A.D. Ricketts T.C. (1995) Alliances in health care: what we know, what we think we know and what we should know. Health Care Management Review 20, 54 64.