Evaluating Partnership: The Role of Formal Assessment Tools

Evaluation

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 285-303

  Halliday, Joyce ^a   Asthana, Sheena N M ^a   Richardson, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

assessment tools; evaluation; Health Action Zones; measuring partnership

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645403341     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389004048279     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Amery, J. (2000) ‘Interprofessional Working in Health Action Zones: How Can This Be Fostered and Sustained?’, Journal of Interprofessional Care14(1): 27-30.
2. Asthana, S., S. Richardson and J. Halliday (2002) ‘Partnership Working in Public Policy Provision: A Framework for Evaluation’, Social Policy and Administration36(7): 780-795.
3. Barnes, M. and H. Sullivan (2002) ‘Building Capacity for Collaboration in English Health Action Zones’, in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp. 81-96. Bristol: The Policy Press.
4. Bartunek, J. and M. Seo (2002) ‘Qualitative Research Can Add New Meanings to Quantitative Research’, Journal of Organizational Behaviour23(2): 237-242.
5. Bauld, L. and K. Judge (2002) ‘The Development of Health Action Zones’, in L. Bauld and K. Judge (eds) Learning from Health Action Zones, pp. 1-13. Chichester: Aeneas.
6. Clarke, J. and C. Glendinning (2002) ‘Partnership and the Remaking of Welfare Governance’, in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp. 33-50. Bristol: The Policy Press.
7. Cotterill, L. (2002) ‘Developing Capacity for Theory-based Evaluation’, in L. Bauld and K. Judge (eds) Learning from Health Action Zones, pp. 117-127. Chichester: Aeneas.
8. Department for Education and Skills (2002) http://fivevital.educe.co.uk (site visted: 16 July 2004).
9. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) Local Strategic Partnerships Government Guidance. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
10. El Ansari, W. and C. Phillips (2001) ‘Interprofessional Collaboration: A Stakeholder Approach to Evaluation of Voluntary Participation in Community Partnerships’, Journal of Interprofessional Care15(4): 351-368.
11. Employers Organisation for Local Government (2002) www.lg-employers.gov.uk (site visted: 16 July 2004).
12. Forss, K., C. Rebien and J. Carlsson (2002) ‘Process Use of Evaluations: Types of Use That Precede Lessons Learned and Feedback’, Evaluation8(1): 29-45.
13. Hardy, B., B. Hudson and E. Waddington (2000) What Makes a Good Partnership? A Partnership Assessment Tool. Leeds: Nuffield Institute for Health, Community Care Division.
14. HAZnet (2001) Background: what are Health Action Zones?Health Development Agency. Available at: http://www.haznet.org.uk/hazs/background/background.asp (site visted: 16 July 2004).
15. Holtom, M. (2001) ‘The Partnership Imperative: Joint Working between Social Services and Health’, Journal of Management in Medicine15(65): 430-445.
16. Hudson, B. and B. Hardy (2002) ‘What is a Successful Partnership and How Can it be Measured?’, in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp. 51-65. Bristol: The Policy Press.
17. Hudson, B. and M. Henwood (2002) ‘The NHS and Social Care: The Final Countdown?’, Policy and Politics30(2): 153-166.
18. Hudson, B., B. Hardy, M. Henwood and G. Wistow (1999) ‘In Pursuit of Inter-agency Collaboration in the Public Sector: What is the Contribution of Theory and Research?’, Public Management1(2): 235-260.
19. Markwell, S. (2003) Partnership Working: A Consumer Guide to Resources. Wetherby: Health Development Agency.
20. Markwell, S., J. Watson, V. Speller, S. Platt and T. Younger (2003) The Working Partnership. Wetherby: Health Development Agency.
21. O’Reagain, S. and R. Keegan (2000) ‘Benchmarking Explained’, Benchmarking in Europe Magazine. Available at: www.benchmarking-in-Europe.com/library (site visited: 14 October 2003).
22. Painter, C. and E. Clarence (2001) ‘UK Local Action Zones and Changing Urban Governance’, Urban Studies38(8): 1215-1232.
23. Powell, M. and C. Glendinning (2002) ‘Introduction’, in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp. 1-14. Bristol: The Policy Press.
24. Powell, M. and G. Moon (2001) ‘Health Action Zones: the “Third” Way of a New Area-based Policy?’, Health and Social Care in the Community9: 43-50.
25. Russell, H. (2001) Local Strategic Partnerships: Lessons from New Commitment to Regeneration. Bristol: The Policy Press & the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
26. Smith, M. and M. Beazley (2000) ‘Progressive Regimes, Partnerships and the Involvement of Local Communities: A Framework for Evaluation’, Public Administration78(4): 855-878.
27. Sullivan, H., M. Barnes and E. Matka (2002) ‘Building Collaborative Capacity Through “Theories of Change”: Early Lessons from the Evaluation of Health Action Zones in England’, Evaluation8(2): 205-226.
28. Valovirta, V. (2002) ‘Evaluation Utilization as Argumentation’, Evaluation8(1): 60-80.
29. Watson, J., V. Speller, S. Markwell and S. Platt (2000) ‘The Verona Benchmark - Applying Evidence to Improve the Quality of Partnership’, Promotion and Education7(2): 16-23.
30. Williamson, V. (2001) ‘The Potential of Project Status to Support Partnerships’, in S. Balloch and M. Taylor (eds) Partnership Working: Policy and Practice, pp. 117-141. Bristol: The Policy Press.
31. World Health Organization/Health Education Board for Scotland (2000) Verona Benchmark: Guide to the Assessment of Good Practice within Partnership Working. Pilot version (March-June 2000).