"Knowledge value alliances": An alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 23-54

  Rogers, Juan D ^a   Bozeman, Barry ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035529068     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016224390102600102     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Averch, H. 1991. The practice of research evaluation in the United States. Research Evaluation 4:130-36.
2. Bozeman, B., and J. Melkers, eds. 1993. Evaluating R&D impacts: Methods and practice. Boston: Kluwer.
3. Bozeman, B., D. Roessner, J. Rogers, and H. Klein. 1997. The R&D Value Mapping Project: Annual report, 1997. Report to the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
4. Bozeman, B., and J. Rogers. 200Oa. A "Churn" model of scientific and technical knowledge value: The non-economics of science. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. _. 2000b. Strategic management of government-sponsored R&D portfolios: Project outputs and "scientific and technical human capital." Environment and Planning C.: Government and Policy.
6. Bozeman, B., J. Rogers, D. Roessner, H. Klein, and J. Park. 1998. The R&D Value Mapping Project: Final report. Report to the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
7. Bozeman, B., and D. Wittmer (1996). Technical roles and success of federal laboratory-industry partnerships. Presented at the EASST/4S Conference: Signatures of Knowledge Societies, 10-13 October, Bielefeld, Germany.
8. Callon, M., J. P. Courtial, P. Crance, P. Laredo, P. Mauguin, V. Rabeharisoa, Y. A. Rocher, and D. Vinck. 1991. Tools for the evaluation of technological programmes: An account of work done at the Centre for the Sociology of Innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 3 (1): 3-41.
9. Callon, M., P. Laredo, and P. Mustar. 1997. The strategic management of research and technology. Paris: Economica International.
10. Callon, Michel. 1991. Techno-economie networks and irreversibility. In A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, edited by John Law, 132-61. London: Routledge.
11. _. 1992. The dynamics of techno-economic networks. In Technological change and company strategies, edited by R. Coombs, P. Saviotti, and V. Walsh, 72-102. London: Academic Press.
12. _. 1993. Variety and irreversibility in networks of technique conception and adoption. In Technology and the wealth of nations, edited by Dominque Foray and Christopher Freeman, 232-68. London: Pinter.
13. _. 1994a. Four models for the dynamics of science. In Handbook of science and technology studies, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald Markle, James Petersen, and Trevor Pinch, 29-63. London: Sage.
14. _. 1994b. Is science a public good? Science, Technology, & Human Values 19 (4): 395-424.
15. _. 1997. Analysis of strategic relations betwsen firms and university laboratories. Presented at the Conference on the Need for a New Economics of Science, February, University of Notre Dame, Indiana.
16. Callon, Michel, and John Law. 1989. On the construction of sociotechnical networks: Content and context revisited. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Science Past and Present 8:57-85.
17. Chubin, D. 1985. Beyond invisible colleges: Inspirations and aspirations of post-1972 social studies of science. Scientometrics 7 (3-6): 221-54.
18. Cozzens, S., S. Popper, J. Bonomo, K. Koizumi, and A. Flanagan. 1994. Methods for evaluating fundamental science. Report prepared for the Office of Science and Technology Policy. Washington, DC: RAND, Critical Technologies Institute.
19. Crane, Diana. 1972. The invisible college. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Crow, M., and B. Bozeman. 1998. Limited by design: R&D laboratories in the US national innovation system. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Elzen, B., B. Enserink, and W. A. Smit. 1996. Socio-technical networks - How a technology studies approach may help to solve problems related to technical change. Social Studies of Science 26 (1): 95-141.
22. Etzkowitz, H. 1989. Entrepreneurial science in the academy: A case of the transformation of norms. Social Problems 36 (1): 14-29.
23. Faulkner, W. 1994. Conceptualizing knowledge used in innovation: A second look at the science-technology distinction and industrial innovation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 1 (4): 425-58.
24. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Novotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
25. Hagstrom, W. O. 1975. The scientific collective. New York: Basic Books.
26. Joly, P. B. 1997. Chercheurs et Laboratoires dans la Nouvelle Economie de la Science. Presented at the Conference on the Need for a New Economics of Science, February, University of Notre Dame, Indiana.
27. Joly, P. B., and V. Mangematin. 1996. Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R&D: The dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation. Research Policy 25 (9): 901-22.
28. Kostoff, R., H. Averch, and D. Chubin. 1994. Research impact assessment: Introduction and overview. Evaluation Review 18 (1): 3-10.
29. Laredo, P. 1997. Technological programs in the European Union. In Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations, edited by Henry Etzkowitz and Loet Leydesdorff. London: Pinter.
30. Link, A. 1996. Evaluating public sector research & development. New York: Greenwood.
31. Liyanage, S. 1995. Breeding innovation clusters through collaborative research networks. Technovation 15 (9): 553-67.
32. McKinney, J. 1966. Constructive typology and social theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
33. Popper, S. 1995. Economic approaches to measuring the performance and benefits of fundamental science. Report prepared for the Office of Science and Technology Policy. Washington, DC: RAND, Critical Technologies Institute.
34. Rappa, M. A., and K. Debackere. 1992. Technological collectives and the diffusion of knowledge. R&D Management 22 (3): 209-20.
35. Rogers, J. D. 2000. Software's "functional coding" and personnel mobility in technology transfer: Linkage fields between industry and publicly funded research. International Journal of Technology Management.
36. Shrum, Wesley. 1985. Organized technology: Networks and innovation in technical systems. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.