A measure of community members' perceptions of the impacts of research partnerships in health and social services

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 289-299

  King, Gillian ^a   Servais, Michelle ^b   Kertoy, Marilyn ^b   Specht, Jacqueline ^b   Currie, Melissa ^a   Rosenbaum, Peter ^c   Law, Mary ^c   Forchuk, Cheryl ^b   Chalmers, Heather ^d   Willoughby, Teena ^d  

^a Ministry of Children and Youth Services Child and Parent Resource Institute   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alliance; Impact; Partnership; Research

Indexed keywords

HEALTH SERVICES; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RESEARCH;

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONSUMER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL WORK; STANDARD;

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL WORK;

EID: 67549102188     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Arcury T.A., Quandt S.A., and McCauley L. Farmworkers and pesticides: Community-based research. Environmental Health Perspectives 108 8 (2000) 787-792
2. Bozeman B., and Boardman C. The NDF engineering research centers and the university-industry research revolution: A brief history featuring an interview with Erich Bloch. The Journal of Technology Transfer 29 3 (2004) 365-375
3. Buxton M., and Hanney S. How can payback for health services research be assessed?. Journal of Health Services Research 1 (1996) 35-43
4. Cohen W.M., and Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 1 (1990) 128-152
5. Currie M., King G., Rosenbaum P., Law M., Kertoy M., and Specht J. A model of impacts of research partnerships in health and social services. Evaluation and Program Planning 28 (2005) 400-412
6. Dickinson H. The evaluation of health and social care partnerships: An analysis of approaches and synthesis for the future. Health and Social Care in the Community 14 5 (2006) 375-383
7. El Ansari W., and Weiss E.S. Quality of research on community partnerships: Developing the evidence base. Health Education Research 21 2 (2006) 175-180
8. Florin P., Mitchell R., Stevenson J., and Klein I. Predicting intermediate outcomes for prevention coalitions: A developmental perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning 23 (2000) 341-346
9. Furlong, N. (2005). 2005/6 ATN Research Quality Framework (RQF) Trial. Retrieved January 21, 2009, from http://dspace.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/46805
10. Gillies P. Effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion. Health Promotion International 13 2 (1998) 99-120
11. Green L.W., George M.A., Daniel M., Frankish C.J., Herbert C.J., Bowie W.R., et al. Study of participatory research in health promotion: Review and recommendations for the development of participatory research in health promotion in Canada (1995), The Royal Society of Canada, Vancouver, BC
12. Halliday J., Asthana S.N.M., and Richardson S. Evaluating partnership: The role of formal assessment tools. Evaluation 10 3 (2004) 285-303
13. Hanney S., Packwood T., and Buxton M. Evaluating the benefits from health research and development centres: A categorization, a model and examples of application. Evaluation 6 2 (2000) 137-160
14. Hanney S.R., Grant J., Wooding S., and Buxton M.J. Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: The impact of funding by the UK's Arthritis Research Campaign. Health Research Policy and Systems 2 4 (2004) 1-11
15. Hays C.E., Hays S.P., DeVille J.O., and Mulhall P.F. Capacity for effectiveness: The relationship between coalition structure and community impact. Evaluation and Program Planning 23 (2000) 373-379
16. Hayward L.M., DeMarco R., and Lynch M.M. Interprofessional collaborative alliances: Health care educators sharing and learning from each other. Journal of Allied Health 29 4 (2000) 220-226
17. Hunt J., Curzio J., Hager S., and Kinn S. The nursing research initiative for Scotland. Nursing Standard 13 31 (1999) 32-35
18. Illback R.J., Kalafat J., and Sanders D. Evaluating integrated service programs. In: Illback R.J., Cobb C.T., and Joseph Jr. H.M. (Eds). Integrated services for children and families: Opportunities for psychological practice (1997), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 323-346
19. Innvaer S., Vist G., Trommald M., and Oxman A. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: A systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 7 (2002) 239-244
20. Israel B.A., Schulz A.J., Parker E.A., and Becker A.B. Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health 19 (1998) 173-202
21. Johnston R. Research impact quantification. Scientometrics 34 3 (1995) 415-426
22. Kahn J.H. Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist 34 5 (2006) 684-718
23. Kegler M.C., Steckler A., McLeroy K., and Malek S.H. Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: A study of 10 Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. Health Education & Behavior 25 3 (1998) 338-353
24. King G., Currie M., Smith L., Servais M., and McDougall J. A framework of operating models for interdisciplinary research programs in clinical service organizations. Evaluation and Program Planning 31 (2008) 160-173
25. King, G., Servais, M., Currie, M., Kertoy, M., Law, M., Rosenbaum, P., et al. (2003). The Community Impacts of Research Oriented Partnerships (CIROP) Respondent Form: Published at www.impactmeasure.org
26. King, G., Servais, M., Forchuk, C., Chalmers, H., Currie, M., Law, M., et al. (2008). Features and impacts of five multidisciplinary community-university research partnerships. Manuscript under review.
27. King S., King G., and Rosenbaum P. Evaluating health service delivery to children with chronic conditions and their families: Development of a refined Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20). Children's Health Care 33 1 (2004) 35-57
28. Kirshner B., and Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Disease 38 1 (1985) 27-36
29. Kuruvilla S., Mays N., Pleasant A., and Walt G. Describing the impact of health research: A research impact framework. BMC Health Services Research 6 1 (2006) 134 doi:110.1186/1472-6963-1186-1134
30. Kuruvilla S., Mays N., and Walt G. Describing the impact of health services and policy research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy Supplement 1, Issue 2 (2007) 23-31
31. Landry R., Amara N., and Lamari M. Climbing the ladder of research utilization: Evidence from social science research. Science Communication 22 4 (2001) 396-422
32. Landry R., Amara N., and Lamari M. Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy 30 2 (2001) 333-349
33. Lave J., and Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
34. Lavis J., Ross S., McLeod C., and Gildiner A. Measuring the impact of health research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 8 3 (2003) 165-170
35. LeGris J., Weir R., Browne G., Gafni A., Stewart L., and Easton S. Developing a model of collaborative research: The complexities and challenges of implementation. International Journal of Nursing Studies 37 1 (2000) 65-79
36. Logan J., and Graham I.D. Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Science Communication 20 2 (1998) 227-246
37. Lomas J. Using 'linkage and exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Affairs 19 3 (2000) 236-240
38. Lyall C., Bruce A., Firn J., Firn M., and Tait J. Assessing end-use relevance of public sector research organisations. Research Policy 33 1 (2004) 73-87
39. Marshall C., and Rossman G.B. Designing qualitative research (1989), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
40. McColl M.A. What do we need to know to practice occupational therapy in the community?. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 52 1 (1998) 11-18
41. Molas-Gallart J., Salter A., Patel P., Scott A., and Duran X. Measuring third stream activities (2002), SPRU, Brighton
42. Nanna M.J., Hinderer S.R., Rosenthal M., and Gans B.M. Clinical rehabilitation research units: Myth or reality? A commentary. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 76 6 (1997) 520-522
43. O'Fallon L.R., and Dearry A. Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives 110 Suppl. 2 (2002) 155-159
44. Oakley D., Marcy S., Swanson J., and Swenson I. Collaborative research: Process and measurement. Nurse Educator 14 1 (1989) 11-15
45. Paine-Andrews A., Harris K.J., Fawcett S.B., Richter K.P., Lewis R.K., Francisco V.T., et al. Evaluating a statewide partnership for reducing risks for chronic diseases. Journal of Community Health 22 5 (1997) 343-359
46. Pirie P.L., Stone E.J., Assaf A.R., Flora J.A., and Maschewsky-Schneider U. Program evaluation strategies for community-based health promotion programs: Perspectives from the cardiovascular disease community research and demonstration studies. Health Education Research 9 1 (1994) 23-26
47. Reardon, R., Lavis, J., & Gibson, J. D. (2006). From research to practice: A knowledge transfer planning guide. Retrieved from http://www.iwh.on.ca/kte/images/IWH_kte_workbook.pdf
48. Ribnick P.G., and Carrano V.A. Understanding the new era in health care accountability: Report cards. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 10 1 (1995) 1-8
49. Richardson A., Jackson C., and Sykes W. Taking research seriously: Means of improving and assessing the use and dissemination of research (1990), HMSO, London
50. Rogers J.D., and Bozeman B. "Knowledge value alliances": An alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 26 1 (2001) 23-55
51. Rossman B.B., Hober D.I., and Ciarlo J.A. Awareness, use, and consequences of evaluation data in a community mental health center. Community Mental Health Journal 15 1 (1979) 7-16
52. Roussos S.T., and Fawcett S.B. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health 21 (2000) 369-402
53. Schwandt T.A. The centrality of practice to evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 26 1 (2005) 95-105
54. Shavelson R.J., and Towne L. Scientific research in education (2002), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
55. Spaapen J., and Wamelink F. The evaluation of university research: A method for the incorporation of the societal value of research (1999), sci_Quest, Amsterdam
56. Stacey R.D. Complex responsive process in organizations: Learning and knowledge creation (2001), Routledge, London
57. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1989). Reliability. In Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use (pp. 79-96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Tash W.R., and Sacks S.M. The payoff: Evaluating research centers, institutes, Laboratories, and consortia for success! (2004), SciPolicy Special Editions, Haverford, PA
59. Weiss C.H. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review 5 (1979) 426-431
60. Wiggins J.S. Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment (1973), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
61. Youtie J., Libaers D., and Bozeman B. Institutionalization of university research centers: The case of the national cooperative program in infertility research. Technovation 26 9 (2006) 1055-1063
62. Zuckerman H.S., Kaluzny A.D., and Ricketts T.C. Alliances in health care: What we know, what we think we know and what we should know. Health Care Management Review 20 1 (1995) 54-64