Customized electronic coupling in self-assembled donor-acceptor nanostructures

Advanced Functional Materials

Volumn 19, Issue 22, 2009, Pages 3567-3573

  De Oteyza, Dimas G ^a,b   García Lastra, Juan M ^c   Corso, Martina ^a   Doyle, Bryan P ^d   Floreano, Luca ^d   Morgante, Alberto ^d   Wakayama, Yutaka ^b   Rubio, Angel ^c   Ortega, J Enrique ^a,c,e  

^a DONOSTIA INTERNATIONAL PHYSICS CENTER DIPC   (Spain)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^d LABORATORIO TASC   (Italy)

^e CENTRO MIXTO CSIC UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO CALCULATIONS; CHARGE TRANSFER PROCESS; CU(1 1 1); DONOR-ACCEPTOR COMPLEX; DONOR-ACCEPTORS; ELECTRONIC COUPLING; METAL SURFACES; METAL-ORGANIC INTERFACE; METALLIC ELECTRODES; ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONICS; SELF-ASSEMBLED; SINGLE COMPONENTS; SUBSTRATE INTERACTION; SUPRA-MOLECULAR NANO STRUCTURES; SYNCHROTRON RADIATION SPECTROSCOPY;

CHARGE TRANSFER; CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; ION EXCHANGE; NANOSTRUCTURES; OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES;

MASS TRANSFER;

EID: 72849135288     PISSN: 1616301X     EISSN: 16163028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200901374     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. a) J.-M. Lehn, Science 2002, 295, 2400.
2. b) D. N. Reinhoudt, M. CregoCalama, Science 2002, 295, 2403.
3. a) J. V. Barth, G. Costantlni, K. Kern, Nature 2005, 437, 671.
4. b) J. V. Barth, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2007, 58, 375.
5. a) C. Stadler, S. Hansen, I. Kröger, C. Kumpf, E. Umbach, Nat. Phys. 2009, 5, 153.
6. b) L. Kilian, A. Haushild, R. Temirov, S. Soubatch, A. Schöll, A. Bendounan, F. Reinert, T.-L. Lee, F. S. Tautz, M. Sokolowski, E. Umbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 136103-1-4.
7. K. J. Franke, G. Schulze, N. Henningsen, I. Fernandez-Torrente, J. I. Pascual, S. Zarwell, K. Rück-Braun, M. Cobian, N. Lorente, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 036807-1-4.
8. D. C. de Oteyza, I. Silanes, M. Ruiz-Oses, E. Barrena, B. P. Doyle, A. Arnau, H. Dosch, Y. Wakayama, J. E. Ortega, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 259.
9. I. Fernandez-Torrente, K. J. Franke, J. I. Pascual, J. Phys. Cond. Matter 2008, 20, 184001-1-11.
10. N. Gonzalez-Lakunza, I. Fernandez-Torrente, K. J. Franke, N. Lorente, A. Arnau, J. I. Pascual, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 156805-1-4.
11. M. Ruiz-Oses, D. C. de Oteyza, I. Fernandez-Torrente, N. GonzalezLakunza, P. M. Schmidt-Weber, T. Kampen, K. Horn, A. Courdon, A. Arnau, J. E. Ortega, ChemPhpChem. 2009, 10, 896.
12. R. Otero, D. Ecija, G. Fernández, J. M. Gallego, L. Sanchez, N. Martín, R. Miranda, Nano Lett 2007, 7, 2602.
13. a) M. de Wild, S. Berner, H. Suzuki, H. Yanagi, D. Schlettwein, S. Ivan, A. Baratoff, H.-J. Guentherodt, T. A. Jung, Chem. Phys. Chem. 2002, 10, 881.
14. b) S. Yoshlmoto, Y. Honda, O. Ito, K. Itaya, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1085.
15. c) M. Treier, M.-T. Nguyen, N. V. Richardson, C. Pignedoli, D. Passerone, R. Fasel, Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 126.
16. d) J. A. Theobald, N. S. Oxtoby, M. A. Phillips, N. R. Champness, P. H. Beton, Nature 2003, 424, 1029.
17. e) L. Scudiero, K. W. Hipps, D. E. Barlow, J. Phys, Chem. B 2003, 107, 2903
18. f) W. Chen, H. Li, H. Huang, Y. Fu, H. L. Zhang, J. Ma, A. T. S. Wee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12285.
19. g) M. E. Cañas-Ventura, W. Xiao, D. Wasserfallen, K. Müllen, H. Brune, J. V. Barth, R. Fasel, Angew. Chem, Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1814.
20. a) N. Karl, K.-H. Kraft, J. Marktanner, M. Münch, F. Schatz, R. Stehle, H. M. Uhde, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1999, 17, 2318.
21. b) D. G. de Oteyza, E. Barrena, J. O. Osso, H. Dosch, S. Meyer, J. Pflaum, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 183504-1-3.
22. Y. Wakayama, J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 2675.
23. D. G. de Oteyza, E. Barrena, H. Dosch, Y. Wakayama, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, DOI:10.1039/B903116B.
24. E. Barrena, D. G. de Oteyza, H. Dosch, Y. Wakayama, ChemPhysChem. 2007, 8, 1915.
25. A. Gerlach, F. Schreiber, S. Sellner, H. Dosch, I. A. Vartanyants, B. C. C. Cowle, T.-L. Lee, J. Zegenhagen, Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71, 205425-1-7.
26. While the quantitative values of charge transfer based on the Mulliken population analysis should be taken with care, the trend and relative changes are considered reliable, a) R. S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys. 1955, 23, 1833.
27. b) C. Fonseca Guerra, J.-W. Handgraaf, E. J. Baerends, F. M. Bickelhaupt, J. Comp. Chem. 2004, 25, 189.
28. J. Stöhr, NEXAFS Spectroscopy, Springer Series in Surface Sciences, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany 2003.
29. K. Takeuchi, A. Suda, S. Ushioda, Surf Sci. 2001, 489, 100.
30. G. Witte, S. Lukas, P. S. Bagus, C. Wöll, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 263502-1-3.
31. The absence of resonances in additionally performed resonant photoemission measurements on single component and binary layers indicates a fast charge transfer between molecules and substrate, which is plausibly also related to the strong electronic molecule-substrate coupling. L. Wang, W. Chen, A. T. S. Wee, Surf. Sci. Rep. 2008, 63, 465.
32. J. A. Knapp, F. J. Himpsel, D. E. Eastman, Phys. Rev. B 1979, 19, 4952.
33. S. G. Louie, P. Thiry, R. Pinchaux, Y. Pétroff, D. Chandesris, J. Lecante, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980, 44, 549.
34. 3z2-r2-like state is more likely to interact and hybridize with adsorbate electronic states of similar energy. An Umklapp effect as the origin for this spectral change can be discarded due to the large energy shift from -3.55 to -4.3 eV, in combination with the relatively low dispersion of this electronic state [21] and the large unit cell dimensions of the crystalline overlayer.
35. 16CuPc resonances. However, because the various fitted resonances typically correspond to a superposition of manifold transitions combining the various initial and final states [5,17,25] such an observation is hampered.
36. M. Alagia, C. Baldacchini, M. G. Betti, F. Bussolotti, V. Carravetta, U. Ekström, C. Mariani, S. Stranges, J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 124305-1-6.
37. The calculations are first performed for gas phase molecules. Then we calculate the effect of charge removal on the core-level binding energies. Finally, the influence of the substrate is mimicked calculating the core-level energies upon charge transfers as obtained from the Mulliken population analysis. This approach shows limited reliability and is expected to account for the difference between experiment and theory. However, the relative energy difference between the different components of the atomic species are reasonably well reproduced.
38. I. Horcas, R. Fernández, J. M. Gómez-Rodríguez, J. Colchero, J. GómezHerrero, A. M. Baro, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007, 78, 013705-1-8.
39. D. G. de Oteyza, E. Barrena, Y. Zhang, T. N. Krauss, A, Turak, A. Vorobiev, H. Dosch J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 4234.
40. L. Floreano, A. Cossaro, R. Cotter, A. Verdini, G. Bavdek, F. Evangelista, A. Ruocco, A. Morgante, D. Cvetko.J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 10794.
41. L. Floreano, G. Naletto, D. Gvetko, R. Gotter, M. Malvezzi, L. Marassi, A. Morgante, A. Santaniello, A. Verdini, F. Tommasini, G. Tondello, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1999, 70, 3855.
42. G. T. Velde, F. M. Bickelhaupt, E. J. Baerends, C. F. Guerra, S. J. A. Van Glsbergen, J. G. Snijders, T. Ziegler.J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 931.
43. S. H. Vosko, L. WiIk, M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200.
44. J. M. Soler, E. Artacho, J. D. Gale, A. Garcia, J, Junquera, P. Ordejón, D. Sánchez-Portal, J. Phys. Cond. Matter 2002, 14, 2745.
45. J. P. Perdew, Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 13244.
46. M. Fuchs, M. Scheffler, Comput. Phys. Commun. 1999, 119, 67.
47. N. Atodiresei, V. Caciuc, P. Lazic, S. Blügel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 136809-1-4.