Simulating posterior parietal damage in a biologically plausible framework: Neuropsychological tests of the search over time and space model

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 343-390

  Mavritsaki, Eirini ^a   Heinke, Dietmar ^a   Deco, Gustavo ^b   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN REGION; CALCIUM TRANSPORT; COGNITION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROTRANSMISSION; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN INJURIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARIETAL LOBE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 71849103173     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: 14640627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290903424329     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Abeles, A. (1991). Corticonics. Neural circuits of the cerebral cortex. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Agter, A., & Donk, M. (2005). Prioritized selection in visual search through onset capture and color inhibition: Evidence from a probe-dot detection task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 722-730.
3. Ahmed, B., Anderson, J., Douglas, R., Martin, K., & Whitteridge, D. (1998). Estimates of the net excitatory currents evoked by visual simulation of identified neurons in cat visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 8, 462-476.
4. Allen, H. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). A psychological investigation into the preview benefit in visual search. Vision Research, 47, 735-745.
5. Anderson, G. M., Heinke, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (in press). Featural guidance in conjunction search: The contrast between orientation and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
6. Batelli, L., Cavanagh, P., & Thornton, I. M. (2003). Perception of biological motion in parietal patients. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1808-1816.
7. Baylis, G. C., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1993). Visual extinction and stimulus repetition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(4), 453-466.
8. Baylis, G. C., Gore, C. L., Rodriguez, P. D., & Shisler, R. J. (2001). Visual extinction and awareness: The importance of binding dorsal and ventral pathways. Visual Cognition, 8, 359-379.
9. Baylis, G. C., Simon, S. L., Baylis, G. C., & Rorden, C. (2002). Visual extinction with double simultaneous stimulation: What is simultaneous? Neuropsychologia, 40(7), 1027-1034.
10. Bisiach, E., & Vallar, E. (2000). Unilateral neglect in humans. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neurophysiology (pp. 459-502). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 213-237.
12. Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Hulleman, J. (2005). Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe-detection analysis of preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 81-101.
13. Brooks, G. A., Fahey, T. D., & Kenneth, M. (2005). Exercise physiology: Human bioenergetics and its applications. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
14. Brunel, N., & Wang, X. (2001). Effects of neuromodulation in a cortical networks model of object working memory dominated by current inhibition. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 11, 63-85.
15. Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbaek, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112,291-328.
16. Cinel, C. Humphreys, G.W. (2006). Onthe relations between implicit and explicit spatial binding: Evidence from Balint's syndrome. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(2), 127-140.
17. Cohen, A., & Rafal, R. D. (1991). Attention and feature integration-illusory conjunctions in a patient with a parietal lobe lesion. Psychological Science, 2, 106-110.
18. Critchley, M. (1953). The parietal lobes. London: Edward Arnold.
19. Deco, G., & Rolls, E. (2005). Neurodynamics of biased competition and cooperation for attention: A model with spiking neuron. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 295-313.
20. Deco, G., Rolls, E., & Horwitz, B. (2004). Integrating fMRI and single-cell data if visual working memory. Neurocomputing, 58/60, 729-737.
21. Deco, G., & Zihl, J. (2001). Top-down selective visual attention: A neurodynamical approach. Visual Cognition, 8(1), 119-140.
22. Di Pellegrino, G., Basso, G., & Frassinetti, F. (1997). Spatial extinction on double asynchronous stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 35(9), 1215-1223.
23. Di Pellegrino, G., Basso, G., & Frassinetti, F. (1998). Visual extinction as a spatio-temporal disorder of selective attention. Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(5), 835-839.
24. Duncan, J., Bundesen, C., Olson, A., Humphreys, G. W., Chavda, S., & Shibuya, H. (1999). Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 128, 1-29.
25. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
26. Duncan, J., Humphreys, G. W., & Ward, R. (1997). Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 255-261.
27. Eglin, M., Robertson, L. C., & Rafal, R. D. (1989). Visual search performance in the neglect syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 372-385.
28. Ellis, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Connectionist psychology. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
29. Forti, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Cross-modal visuo-tactile matching in a patient with a semantic disorder. Neuropsychologia, 43(11), 1568-1579.
30. Friedman-Hill, S. R., Robertson, L. C., & Treisman, A. (1995). Parietal contributions to visual feature binding-evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science, 269, 853-855.
31. Gilchrist, I., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1996). Grouping and extinction: Evidence for low level modulation of selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 1223-1256.
32. Heinke, D., Deco, G., Zihl, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). A computational neuroscience account of visual neglect. Neurocomputing, 44, 811-816.
33. Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. (2003). Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: Simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM). Psychological Review, 110, 29-87.
34. Hestrin, S., Sah, P., & Nicoll, R. (1990). Mechanisms generating the time course of dual component excitatory synaptic currents recorded in hippocampal slices. Neuron, 5, 247-253.
35. Hodsoll, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Driving attention with the top down: The relative contri bution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 918-926.
36. Humphreys, G. (1998). Neural representation of objects in space: A dual coding account. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 353, 1341-1351.
37. Humphreys, G. W. (2001). A multi-stage account of binding in vision: Neuropsychological evidence. Visual Cognition, 8, 381-410.
38. Humphreys, G. W., Hodsoll, J., & Riddoch, M. J. (2009a). Fractionating the binding process: Neuropsychological evidence from reversed search efficiencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 627-647.
39. Humphreys, G. W., Jung Stalmann, B., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2004). An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(5), 713-730.
40. Humphreys, G. W., Mavritsaki, E., Heinke, D. G., & Deco, G. (2009b). Application of neural-level model to human visual search: Modelling the whole system behaviour, neuropsychological break down and BOLD signal activation. In D.G. Heinke & E. Mavritsaki (Eds.), Bridging the gap between physiology and cognition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
41. Humphreys, G. W., & Muller, H. J. (1993). SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 43-110.
42. Humphreys, G. W., Olivers, C. N. L., & Braithwaite, J. J. (2006a). The time course of preview search with color-defined, not luminance-defined stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(8), 1351-1358.
43. Humphreys, G. W., Olivers, C. N. L., & Yoon, E. Y. (2006b). An onset advantage without a preview benefit: Neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 110-120.
44. Humphreys, G. W., & Price, C. J. (1994). Visual feature discrimination in simultanagnosia: A study of two cases. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 393-434.
45. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1993). Interactions between object and space vision revealed through neuropsychology. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and Performance XIV. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1994). Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: Multiple sites for visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(2), 207.
47. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1995). Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: Evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 283-312.
48. Humphreys, G. W., Watelet, A., & Riddoch, M. J. (2006c). Long-term effects of prism adaptation in chronic visual neglect: A single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(3), 463-478.
49. Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., & Joliceour, P. (2002). Fractionating visual marking: Dual task decomposition of the marking state by timing and modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 640-660.
50. Husain, M., Mannan, S., Hodgson, T., Wojciulik, E., Driver, J., & Kennard, C. (2001). Impaired spatial working memory across saccades contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect. Brain, 124(5), 941-952.
51. Husain, M., & Rorden, C. (2003). Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 4, 26-36.
52. Husain, M., Shapiro, K., Martin, J., & Kennard, C. (1997). Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients. Nature, 385, 154-156.
53. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
54. Jahr, C., & Stevens, C. (1990). Voltage-dependence of NMDA-activated macroscopic conductances predicted by single -channel kinetics. Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 3178-3182.
55. Karnath, H. O. (1988). Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect. Neuropsychologia, 26, 27-43.
56. Karnath, H. O., Himmelbach, M., & Kuker, W. (2003). The cortical substrate of visual extinction. Neuroreport, 14, 437-442.
57. Kitadono, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Interaction between perception and action programming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 731-754.
58. Kumada, T., & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Lexical recovery from extinction: Interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(5), 465-478.
59. Ladavas, E., Petronio, A., & Umilta, C. (1990). The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex, 26, 353-366.
60. Liu, Y., & Wang, X. (2001). Spike-frequency adaptation of a generalized leaky integrate-and-fire model neuron. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 10, 25-45.
61. Madison, D., & Nicoll, R. (1984). Control of the repetitive discharge of rate ca1 pyramidal neurons in vitro. Journal of Physiology, 345, 319-331.
62. Malhotra, P., Parton, A. D., Greenwood, R., & Husain, M. (2005). Noradrenergic modulation of space exploration in visual neglect. Annals of Neurology, 59,186-190.
63. Mattingley, J. B., Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1997). Preattentive filling-in of visual surfaces in parietal extinction. Science, 275, 671-674.
64. Mavritsaki, E., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Deco, G. (2006). A computational model of visual marking using an interconnected network of spiking neurons: The spiking search over time & space model (sSoTS). Journal of Physiology Paris, 100,110-124.
65. Mavritsaki, E., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G., Deco, G. (2007). Suppressive effects in visual search: A neurocomputational analysis of preview search. Neurocomputing.
66. McCormick, D., Connors, B., Loghthall, J., & Prince, D. (1985). Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons in the neocortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 54, 782-806.
67. Mozer, M. C., & Behrmann, M. (1990). On the interaction of selective attention and lexical knowledge: A connectionist account of neglect dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 96-123.
68. Mozer, M. C., Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1997). The end of the line for a brain damaged model of unilateral neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 171-190.
69. Olivers, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down limited capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 22-42.
70. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2004). Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: Evidence from parietal lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30(4), 667-688.
71. Posner, M., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of language processes. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
72. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
73. Pouget, A., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). A new view of hemineglect case on the response properties of parietal neurons. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, B352, 1449-1459.
74. Rees, D., Backus, B., & Heeger, D. (2000). Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 940-945.
75. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Perceptual and action systems in unilateral neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
76. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Edwards, S., Baker, T., & Willson, K. (2003). Seeing the action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nature Neuroscience, 6(1),82-89.
77. Robertson, I. H. (1994). The rehabilitation of attentional and hemi-inattentional disorders. In M. J. Riddoch & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation (pp. 173-186). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
78. Robertson, I. H., & Manley, T. (1999). Sustained attention deficits in time and space. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 279-310). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
79. Robertson, I. H., Mattingley, J. B., Rorden, C., & Driver, J. (1998). Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness. Nature, 396(10), 169-172.
80. Robertson, L. C., Treisman, A., Friedman-Hill, S. R., & Grabowecky, M. (1997). The interaction of spatial and object pathways: Evidence from Balint's syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 295-317.
81. Rolls, E., & Deco, G. (2002). Computational neuroscience of vision: Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
82. Rolls, E., & Treves, A. (1998). Neural networks and brain function. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
83. Salin, P., & Prince, D. (1996). Spontaneous GABA-a receptor mediated inhibitory currents in adult rat somatosensory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75,1573-1588.
84. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568.
85. Sejnowski, T. J. (1986). Open questions about computation in cerebral cortex. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Psychological and biological models (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86. Servan-Schreiber, D., Printz, H., & Cohen, J. D. (1990). A network model of catecholamine effects gain signal to noise ratio and behavior. Science, 249(4971),892-895.
87. Snow, J., & Mattingley, J. B. (2006). Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: How intact is the ipsilesional field? Brain Research Reviews, 129(1), 168-181.
88. Spruston, N., Jonas, P., & Sakmann, B. (1995). Dendritic glutamate receptor channel in rat hippocampal ca3 and ca1 pyramidal neurons. Journal of Physiology, 482, 325-352.
89. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
90. Tuckwell, H. (1998). Introduction to theoretical neurobiology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
91. Ward, R., Goodrich, S., & Driver, J. (1994). Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological ev dence for weight-linkage in visual selection. Visual Cognition, 1, 101-130.
92. Watson, D., & Humphreys, G. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
93. Watson, D., & Humphreys, G. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 471-480.
94. Watson, D., Humphreys, G., & Olivers, C. (2003). Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 180-186.
95. Wilson, B. A., Cockburn, J., & Halligan, P. (1987). The behavioral inattention test. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
96. Wilson, F., O'Scalaidhe, S., & Goldman-Rakic, P. (1994). Functional synergism between putative gamma-aminobutyrate-containing neurons in pyramidal neurons in prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 4009-4013.
97. Wojciulik, E., Husain, M., Clarke, K., & Driver, J. (2001). Spatial working memory deficit in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 39, 390-396.
98. Wojciulik, E., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Implicit visual attribute binding following bilateral parietal damage. Visual Cognition, 5, 157-181.
99. Wolfe, J. W. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(2), 202-238.
100. Xiang, Z., Huguenard, H., & Prince, D. (1998). GABA-a receptor mediated currents in interneurons and pyramidal cells of rat visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 506, 715-730.