Suppressive effects in visual search: A neurocomputational analysis of preview search

Neurocomputing

Volumn 70, Issue 10-12, 2007, Pages 1925-1931

  Mavritsaki, Eirini ^a   Heinke, Dietmar ^a   Humphreys, Glyn ^a   Deco, Gustavo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Frequency adaptation; Spiking neurons; Visual marking; Visual search

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGICALLY PLAUSIBLE NEURAL NETWORK; FREQUENCY ADAPTATION; NEUROCOMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; SPIKING NEURONS; VISUAL MARKING; VISUAL SEARCH;

NEURONS;

CALCIUM;

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; POTASSIUM CURRENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYNAPSE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 34247476891     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.10.077     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Watson D., and Humphreys G. Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychol. Rev. 104 (1997) 90-122
2. Donk M., and Theeuwes J. Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Percept. Psychophys. 63 (2000) 891-900
3. Humphreys G.W., Jolicoeur P., and Watson D. Fractionating the preview benefit in search: dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality. J.Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 28 3 (2002) 640-660
4. Watson D., and Humphreys G. Visual marking: evidence for inhibition using probe-dot detection paradigm. Percept. Psychophys. 62 (2000) 471-480
5. Deco G., and Zihl J. Top-down selective visual attention: a neurodynamical approach. Vis. Cognit. 8 1 (2001) 119-140
6. Heinke D., and Humphreys G. Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM). Psychol. Rev. 110 (2003) 29-87
7. Abeles A. Corticonics (1991), Cambridge University Press
8. Deco G., and Rolls E. Neurodynamics of biased competition and cooperation for attention: a model with spiking neuron. J. Neurophysiol. 94 (2005) 295-313
9. Tuckwell H. Introduction to Theoretical Neurobiology (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
10. Brunel N., and Wang X. Effects of neuromodulation in a cortical networks model of object working memory dominated by current inhibition. J.Comput. Neurosci. 11 (2001) 63-85
11. Liu Y., and Wang X. Spike-frequency adaptation of a generalized leaky integrate-and-fire model neuron. J.Comput. Neurosci. 10 (2001) 25-45
12. Wolfe J.W. Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 1 2 (1994) 202-238
13. Humphreys G.W., Jung Stalmann B., and Olivers C.N.L. An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search. Percept. Psychophys. 66 5 (2004) 713-730
14. Braithwaite J.J., and Humphreys G.W. Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: evidence from effects of colour foreknowledge on preview search. Percept.Psychophys. 65 (2003) 237-312
15. Humphreys G.W., Watson D.G., and Jolicoeur P. Fractionating the preview benefit in search: dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing modality. J. Exp. Psychol. 28 (2002) 640-660