Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: How intact is the ipsilesional field?

Brain

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 168-181

  Snow, Jacqueline C ^a   Mattingley, Jason B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Feature based selection; Goal driven; Selectivity; Spatial extinction; Stimulus driven

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; NEUROMODULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SEX; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

AGED; ATTENTION; BRAIN; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEREBRAL INFARCTION; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GOALS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 30344471818     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh690     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Albert ML. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 1973; 23: 658-64.
2. Andersen RA, Essick GK, Siegel RM. Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science 1985; 230: 456-8.
3. Assad JA. Neural coding of behavioral relevance in parietal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003; 13: 194-7.
4. Asaad WF, Rainer G, Miller EK. Task-specific neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84: 451-9.
5. Audet T, Bub D, Lecours AR. Visual neglect and left-sided context effects. Brain Cogn 1991; 16: 11-28.
6. Bartolomeo P, Chokron S, Sieroff E. Facilitation instead of inhibition for repeated right-sided events in left neglect. Neuroreport 1999; 10: 3353-7.
7. Bartolomeo P, Sieroff E, Decaix C, Chokron S. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set. Exp Brain Res 2001; 137: 432-44.
8. Baylis GC, Driver J. Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors. Percept Psychophys 1992; 51: 145-62.
9. Baylis GC, Driver J, Rafal RD. Visual extinction and stimulus repetition. J Cogn Neurosci 1993; 5: 453-66.
10. Behrmann M, Watt S, Black SE, Barton JJ. Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 1445-58.
11. Behrmann M, Geng JJ, Shomstein S. Parietal cortex and attention. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004; 14: 212-7.
12. Bender MB, Teuber HL. Phenomena of fluctuation, extinction and completion in visual perception. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1946; 55: 627-58.
13. Berti A. Unconscious processing in neglect. In: Karnath H-O, Milner D, Vallar G, editors. The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect. London: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 313-26.
14. Berti A, Allport A, Driver J, Dienes Z, Oxbury J, Oxbury S. Levels of processing for visual stimuli in an 'extinguished' field. Neuropsychologia 1992; 30: 403-15.
15. Bisley JW, Goldberg ME. Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention. Science 2003; 299: 81-6.
16. Boutsen L, Humphreys GW. Axis-based grouping reduces visual extinction. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 896-905.
17. Brain WR. Visual orientation with special reference to lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain 1941; 64: 244-72.
18. Brass M, von Cramon DY. Selection for cognitive control: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on the selection of task-relevant information. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 8847-52.
19. Cohen A, Shoup R. Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes. Cognit Psychol 1997; 32: 128-81.
20. Cohen A, Ivry RB, Rafal RD, Kohn C. Activating response codes by stimuli in the neglected visual field. Neuropsychology 1995; 9: 165-73.
21. Colby CL, Goldberg ME. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 1999; 22: 319-49.
22. Connor CE, Egeth HE, Yantis S. Visual attention: bottom-up versus top-down. Curr Biol 2004; 14: R850-2.
23. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 201-15.
24. Culham JC, Kanwisher NG. Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 157-63.
25. Danckert J, Maruff P, Kinsella G, de Graaff S, Currie J. Attentional modulation of implicit processing of information in spatial neglect. Neuroreport 1999; 10: 1077-83.
26. De Renzi E, Gentilini M, Faglioni P, Barbieri C. Attentional shift towards the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect. Cortex 1989; 25: 231-7.
27. Desimone R. Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. In: Humphreys G, Duncan J, Treisman A, editors. Attention, space, and action. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 13-30.
28. Desimone R, Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 1995; 18: 193-222.
29. Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD. A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3: 277-83.
30. Driver J. Object segmentation and visual neglect. Behav Brain Res 1995; 71: 135-46.
31. Driver J. A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. Br J Psychol 2001; 92: 53-78.
32. Driver J, Vuilleumier P. Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition 2001a; 79: 39-88.
33. Driver J, Vuilleumier P. Unconscious processing in neglect and extinction. In: de Gelder B, De Haan EHE, Heywood C, editors. Out of mind: varieties of unconscious processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001b.
34. Driver J, Baylis GC, Rafal RD. Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect. Nature 1992; 360: 73-5.
35. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J Exp Psychol Gen 1984; 113: 501-17.
36. Duncan J, Humphreys G, Ward R. Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1997; 7: 255-61.
37. Duncan J, Bundesen C, Olson A, Humphreys G, Chavda S, Shibuya H. Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. J Exp Psychol Gen 1999; 128: 450-78.
38. Edgworth J, Robertson IH, MacMillan T. The Balloons Test: a screening test for visual inattention. Edmunds, United Kingdom: Thames Valley Test Company; 1998.
39. Egeth HE, Yantis S. Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. Annu Rev Psychol 1997; 48: 269-97.
40. Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 1974; 16: 143-9.
41. Eriksen CW, Hoffman JE. The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Percept Psychophys 1973; 14: 155-60.
42. Forster KI, Forster JC. DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2003; 35: 116-24.
43. Freedman DJ. Posterior parietal cortex: space - and beyond. Neuron 2004; 42: 881-3.
44. Friedman-Hill SR, Robertson LC, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distractors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 4263-8.
45. Fries P, Reynolds JH, Rorie AE, Desimone R. Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science 2001; 291: 1560-3.
46. Fuentes LJ, Humphreys GW. On the processing of 'extinguished' stimuli in unilateral visual neglect: an approach using negative priming. Cogn Neuropsychol 1996; 13: 111-36.
47. Gainotti G, D'Erme P, Bartolomeo P. Early orientation of attention toward the half space ipsilateral to the lesion in patients with unilateral brain damage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54: 1082-9.
48. Gilchrist ID, Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ. Grouping and extinction: evidence for low-level modulation of visual selection. Cogn Neuropsychol 1996; 13: 1223-49.
49. Gottlieb JP, Kusunoki M, Goldberg ME. The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature 1998; 391: 481-4.
50. Graboi D, Lisman J. Recognition by top-down and bottom-up processing in cortex: the control of selective attention. J Neurophysiol 2003; 90: 798-810.
51. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Ann Neurol 1979; 5: 166-70.
52. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Clinical neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
53. Heilman KW, Valenstein E, Watson RT. The neglect syndrome. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW, Klawans HL, editors. Handbook of clinical neurology. Vol. 45. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1985. p. 152-83.
54. Hopf JM, Boelmans K, Schoenfeld MA, Luck SJ, Heinze HJ. Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 1822-32.
55. Itti L, Koch C. Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2: 194-203.
56. Karnath H-O. Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemineglect. Neuropsychologia 1988; 26: 27-43.
57. Karnath HO, Hartje W. Residual information processing in the neglected visual half-field. J Neurol 1987; 234: 180-4.
58. Karnath HO, Niemeier M, Dichgans J. Space exploration in neglect. Brain 1998; 121: 2357-67.
59. Karnath HO, Himmelbach M, Kuker W. The cortical substrate of visual extinction. Neuroreport 2003; 14: 437-42.
60. Kastner S, Ungerleider LG. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 2000; 23: 315-41.
61. Kastner S, Ungerleider LG. The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 1263-76.
62. Kastner S, Pinsk MA, De Weerd P, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 1999; 22: 751-61.
63. Kinsbourne M. Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, editors. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1993. p. 63-86.
64. Kusunoki M, Gottlieb J, Goldberg ME. The lateral intraparietal area as a salience map: the representation of abrupt onset, stimulus motion, and task relevance. Vision Res 2000; 40: 1459-68.
65. Ladavas E. Spatial dimensions of automatic and voluntary orienting components of attention. In: Robertson IA, Marshall JC, Code C, Muller D, editors. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1993. p. 193-210.
66. Lavie N, Robertson IH. The role of perceptual load in neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load. J Cogn Neurosci 2001; 13: 867-76.
67. Luo CR, Anderson JM, Caramazza A. Impaired stimulus-driven orienting of attention and preserved goal-directed orienting of attention in unilateral visual neglect. Am J Psychol 1998; 111: 487-507.
68. Mannan SK, Mort DJ, Hodgson TL, Driver J, Kennard C, Husain M. Revisiting previously searched locations in visual neglect: role of right parietal and frontal lesions in misjudging old locations as new. J Cogn Neurosci 2005; 17: 340-54.
69. Martinez-Trujillo JC, Treue S. Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex. Curr Biol 2004; 14: 744-51.
70. Maruff P, Danckert J, Camplin G, Currie J. Behavioral goals constrain the selection of visual information. Psychol Sci 1999; 10: 522-5.
71. Mattingley JB. Spatial extinction and its relation to mechanisms of normal attention. In: Karnath H, Milner A, Vallar G, editors. The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 289-312.
72. Mattingley JB, Berberovic N, Corben L, Slavin MJ, Nicholls MER, Bradshaw JL. The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42: 387-94.
73. Mattingley JB, Bradshaw J, Bradshaw J, Nettleton N. Residual rightward attentional bias after apparent recovery from right hemisphere damage: implications for a multicomponent model of neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 597-604.
74. Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Bradshaw JA. The effects of unilateral visuospatial neglect on perception of Muller-Lyer illusory figures. Perception 1995; 24: 415-33.
75. Mattingley JB, Davis G, Driver J. Preattentive filling-in of visual surfaces in parietal extinction. Science 1997; 275: 671-4.
76. McAdams CJ, Maunsell JH. Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4. J Neurophysiol 2000; 83: 1751-5.
77. McGlinchey-Berroth R, Milberg WP, Verfaellie M, Alexander M, Kilduff PT. Semantic processing in the neglected visual field: evidence from a lexical decision task. Cogn Neuropsychol 1993; 10: 79-108.
78. Miller J. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions. Percept Psychophys 1991; 49: 270-88.
79. Milliken B, Tipper SP. Attention and inhibition. In: Pashler H, editor. Attention. Hove: Psychology Press/Erlbaum: Taylor & Francis; 1998. p. 191-222.
80. Mordkoff JT. Between-dimension flanker effects: a clarification with encouraging implications. Psychon Bull Rev 1998; 5: 670-5.
81. Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, Rorden C, Pambakian A, Kennard C, et al. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 2003; 126: 1986-97.
82. Neill WT, Westberry RL. Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1987; 13: 327-34.
83. Ogawa T, Komatsu H. Target selection in area V4 during a multidimensional visual search task. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 6371-82.
84. Olson CR. Object-based vision and attention in primates. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 171-9.
85. Pavlovskaya M, Sagi D, Soroker N, Ring H. Visual extinction and cortical connectivity in human vision. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1997; 6: 159-62.
86. Pavlovskaya M, Sagi D, Soroker N. Contrast dependence of perceptual grouping in brain-damaged patients with visual extinction. Spat Vis 2000; 13: 403-14.
87. Peers P, Ludwig C, Rorden C, Cusack R, Bonfiglioli C, Bundesen C, et al. Attentional functions of parietal and frontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2005; Advance access published on February 2.
88. Pessoa L, Kastner S, Ungerleider LG. Neuroimaging studies of attention: from modulation of sensory processing to top-down control. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 3990-8.
89. Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 1980; 32: 3-25.
90. Pouget A, Driver J. Relating unilateral neglect to the neural coding of space. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2000; 10: 242-9.
91. Pouget A, Deneve S, Sejnowski TJ. Frames of reference in hemineglect: a computational approach. Prog Brain Res 1999; 121: 81-97.
92. Ptak R, Valenza N, Schnider A. Expectation-based attentional modulation of visual extinction in spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 2199-205.
93. Rees G, Wojciulik E, Clarke K, Husain M, Frith C, Driver J. Neural correlates of conscious and unconscious vision in parietal extinction. Neurocase 2002; 8: 387-93.
94. Reynolds JH, Pasternak T, Desimone R. Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron 2000; 26: 703-14.
95. Ro T, Rafal RD. Perception of geometric illusions in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 1996; 34: 973-8.
96. Ro T, Cohen A, Ivry RB, Rafal RD. Response channel activation and the temporoparietal junction. Brain Cogn 1998; 37: 461-76.
97. Robinson DL, Petersen SE. The pulvinar and visual salience. Trends Neurosci 1992; 15: 127-32.
98. Rorden C, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 2000; 12: 191-200.
99. Rorden C, Karnath HO. Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5: 813-9.
100. Rusconi ML, Maravita A, Bottini G, Vallar G. Is the intact side really intact? Perseverative responses in patients with unilateral neglect: a productive manifestation. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 594-604.
101. Saenz M, Buracas GT, Boynton GM. Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 631-2.
102. Smania N, Martini MC, Gambina G, Tomelleri G, Palamara A, Natale E, et al. The spatial distribution of visual attention in hemineglect and extinction patients. Brain 1998; 121: 1759-70.
103. Stoet G, Snyder LH. Single neurons in posterior parietal cortex of monkeys encode cognitive set. Neuron 2004; 42: 1003-12.
104. Tipper SP, Weaver B, Houghton G. Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Q J Exp Psychol A 1994; 47A: 809-40.
105. Toth LJ, Assad JA. Dynamic coding of behaviourally relevant stimuli in parietal cortex. Nature 2002; 415: 165-8.
106. Treisman AM, Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognit Psychol 1980; 12: 97-136.
107. Treue S. Visual attention: the where, what, how and why of saliency. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003; 13: 428-32.
108. Treue S, Martinez Trujillo JC. Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature 1999; 399: 575-9.
109. Triesman A. The perception of features and objects. In: Baddeley A, Weiskrantz L, editors. Attention, selection, awareness and control. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1993.
110. Vallar G. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends Cogn Sci 1998; 2: 87-97.
111. Vallar G, Rusconi ML, Bignamini L, Geminiani G, Perani D. Anatomical correlates of visual and tactile extinction in humans: a clinical CT scan study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 464-70.
112. VanRullen R. Visual saliency and spike timing in the ventral visual pathway. J Physiol Paris 2003; 97: 365-77.
113. Vecera SP, Farah MJ. Does visual attention select objects or locations? J Exp Psychol Gen 1994; 123: 146-60.
114. Vivas AB, Humphreys GW, Fuentes LJ. Inhibitory processing following damage to the parietal lobe. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 1531-40.
115. Vuilleumier PO, Rafal RD. A systematic study of visual extinction: between-and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect. Brain 2000; 123: 1263-79.
116. Vuilleumier P, Sagiv N. Two eyes make a pair: facial organization and perceptual learning reduce visual extinction. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 1144-9.
117. Vuilleumier P, Schwartz S. Emotional facial expressions capture attention. Neurology 2001; 56: 153-8.
118. Vuilleumier P, Armony JL, Clarke K, Husain M, Driver J, Dolan RJ. Neural response to emotional faces with and without awareness; event-related fMRI in a parietal patient with visual extinction and spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 2156-66.
119. Wallis JD, Anderson KC, Miller EK. Single neurons in prefrontal cortex encode abstract rules. Nature 2001; 411: 953-6.
120. Ward R, Goodrich S, Driver J. Grouping reduces visual extinction: neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection. Vis Cogn 1994; 1: 101-29.
121. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan PW. Behavioural Inattention Test. Thames Valley, Bury St Edmunds, 1987.
122. Yantis S. Neuroscience. To see is to attend. Science 2003; 299: 54-6.
123. Yantis S, Serences JT. Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003; 13: 187-93.