The time course of preview search with color-defined, not luminance-defined, stimuli

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1351-1358

  Humphreys, Glyn W ^a   Olivers, Christian N L ^b   Bratrawaite, Jason J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247174863     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193733     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. AGTER, F., & DONK, M. (2005). Prioritized selection in visual search through onset capture and color inhibition: Evidence from a probe-dot detection task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 722-730.
2. BELOPOLSKY, A. V., THEEUWES, J., & KRAMER, A. F. (2005). Prioritization by transients in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 93-99.
3. BRAITHWAITE, J. J., HULLEMAN, J., WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2006). Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items, or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 290-300.
4. BRAITHWAITE, J. J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2003). Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 213-237.
5. BRAITHWAITE, J. J., HUMPHREYS, G. W., WATSON, D. G., & HULLEMAN, J. (2005). Revisiting preview search at isoluminance: New onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1214-1228.
6. CEPEDA, N. J., CAVE, K. R., BICHOT, N. P., & KIM, M.-S. (1998). Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 727-746.
7. COLE, G. C., KENTEIDGE, R. W., & HEYWOOD, C. A. (2005). Object onset and parvocellular guidance of attentional allocation. Psychological Science, 16, 270-274.
8. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
9. DONK, M., & VERBURG, R. C. (2004). Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 282-288.
10. HUMPHREYS, G. W., JUNG STALMANN, B., & OLIVERS, C. (2004). An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 713-730.
11. HUMPHREYS, G. W., KYLLINSBÆK, S., WATSON, D. G., OLIVERS, C. N. L., LAW, I., & PAULSON, O. (2004). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57 A, 610-635.
12. HUMPHREYS, G. W., QUINLAN, P. T., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (1989). Grouping effects in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 258-279.
13. HUMPHREYS, G. W., WATSON, D. G., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2002). Fractionating visual marking: Dual-task decomposition of the marking state by timing and modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 640-660.
14. JIANG, Y., CHUN, M. M., & MARKS, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 717-730.
15. LIVINGSTONE, M. S., & HUBEL, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement and depth. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416-3468.
16. OLIVERS, C. N. L., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2003). Visual marking and singleton capture: Fractionating the unitary nature of visual selection. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 1-42.
17. RAUSCHENBERGER, R. (2003). When something old becomes something new: Spatiotemporal object continuity and attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 600-615.
18. SNOWDEN, R. J. (2002). Visual attention to color: Parvocellular guidance of attentional resources? Psychological Science, 13, 180-184.
19. TREISMAN, A., & SATO, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
20. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritising selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
21. WATSON, D. G., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & OLIVERS, C. N. L. (2003). Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 180-186.
22. YANTIS, S., & GIBSON, B. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182-204.