Phylogeny and evolution of morphological characters in tribe Chamaedoreeae (Arecaceae)

Taxon

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1092-1108

  Cuenca, Argelia ^a,b   Dransfield, John ^c   Asmussen Lange, Conny B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arecaceae; Chamaedorea; Chamaedoreeae; Gaussia; Hyophorbe; matK; Morphological characters; ndhF; Palms; PRK; RPB2; rps16 intron; Synechanthus; trnD trnT; trnL trnF; Wendlandiella

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS; DIOECY; MONOCOTYLEDON; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; RELATEDNESS; TAXONOMY;

ARECACEAE; CHAMAEDOREA; GAUSSIA (ANGIOSPERM); HYOPHORBE; SYNECHANTHUS; WENDLANDIELLA;

EID: 71049162519     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.584004     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Askgaard, A. 1995. Comparative Studies of Floral Morphology and Anatomy in Chamaedorea (Arecaceae). M.Sc. thesis, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Aarhus.
2. Asmussen, C.B., Baker, W.J. & Dransfield, J. 2000. Phylogeny of the palm family (Arecaeae) based on rps16 intron and trnL-trnF plastid DNA sequences. Pp. 525-537 in: Wilson, K.L & Morrison, D.A. (eds.), Monocots: Systematics and Evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne.
3. Asmussen, C.B. & Chase, M.W. 2001. Coding and noncoding plastid DNA in palm systematics. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1103-1117.
4. Asmussen, C.B., Dransfield, J., Deickmann, V., Barfod, A.S., Pintaud, J.C. & Baker, W.J. 2006. A new subfamily classification of the palm family (Arecaceae): evidence from plastid DNA phylogeny. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 151: 15-38.
5. Baker, R.H. & DeSalle, R. 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46: 654-673.
6. Baker, W.J., Dransfield, J., Harley, M.M. & Bruneau, A. 1999. Morphology and cladistic analysis of subfamily Calamoideae (Palmae). Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 83: 307-323.
7. Baker, W.J., Dransfield, J. & Hedderson, T. A. 2000. Phylogeny, character evolution, and a new classification of the Calamoid palms. Syst. Bot. 25: 297-322.
8. Baker, R.H., Yu, X. & DeSalle, R. 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 9: 427-436.
9. Barfod, A.S., Ervik, F. & Bernal, R. 1999. Recent evidence on the evolution of phytelephantoid palms (Palmae). Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 83: 266-277.
10. Bawa, K.S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 15-39.
11. Cook, O.F. 1923. Opsiandra a new genus of palms growing on Maya ruins in Peten, Guatemala. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 13: 170-184.
12. Cuenca, A. & Asmussen-Lange, C.B. 2007. Phylogeny of the palm tribe Chamaedoreeae (Arecaceae) based on plastid DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 32: 250-263.
13. Cuenca, A., Asmussen-Lange, C.B. & Borchsenius, F. 2008. A dated phylogeny of the palm tribe Chamaedoreeae supports Eocene dispersal between Africa, North and South America. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 46: 760-775.
14. Dammer, U. & Urban, I. 1903. Palmae. Pp. 126-131 in: Urban, I. (ed.), Symbolae Antillanae, vol. 4, Flora Portoricensis. Fratres Borntraeger, Lipsiae.
15. Dransfield, J. & Uhl, N.W. 1998. Palmae. Pp. 306-389 in: Kubitzi, K. (ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol. 4. Springer, Berlin.
16. Dransfield, J., Uhl, N.W., Asmussen, C.B., Baker, W.J., Harley, M.M. & Lewis, C.E. 2005. An outline of a new classification of the palm family, Arecaceae. Kew Bull. 60: 559-569.
17. Dransfield, J., Uhl, N.W., Asmussen, C.B., Baker, W.J., Harley, M.M. & Lewis, C.E. 2008. Genera Palmarum. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
18. Fisher, J.B. & Moore, H.E. 1975. Multiple inflorescences in palms (Arecaceae): their development and significance. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 98: 573-611.
19. Govaerts, R. & Dransfield, J. 2005. World Checklist of Palms. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
20. Hahn, W.J. 1999. Molecular systematic studies of the palmae. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 83: 47-60.
21. Henderson, A. 1995. The Palms of the Amazon. Oxford Uni- versity Press, New York.
22. Henderson, A. 1999. A phylogenetic analysis of the Euterpeinae (Palmae, Arecoideae, Areceae) based on morphology and anatomy. Brittonia 51: 106-113.
23. Henderson, A., Ferreira, E. 2002. A morphometric study of Synechanthus. Syst. Bot. 27: 693-702.
24. Henderson, A., Galeano, G. & Bernal, R. 1995. Field Guide to the Palms of the Americas. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
25. Hodel, D.R. 1992. Chamaedorea Palms: The Species and their Cultivation. International Palm Society, Lawrence.
26. Hodel, D.R. 1999. Problems interpreting variation in Chamae- dorea (Palmae). Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 83: 185-189.
27. Lee M.S. 2006. Morphological phylogenetics and the universe of useful characters. Taxon 55: 5-7.
28. Lewis, C.E. 2002. A phylogenetic analysis of the palm tribe Oncospermatinae (Arecaceae) based on morphological characters. Brittonia 54: 78-91.
29. Lewis, C.E. & Doyle, J.J. 2002. A phylogenetic analysis of tribe Areceae (Arecaceae) using two low-copy nuclear genes. Pl. Syst. Evol. 236: 1-17.
30. Loo, A.H., Dransfield, J., Chase, M.W. & Baker, W.J. 2006. Low copy nuclear DNA, phylogeny and the evolution of dichogamy in the betel nut palms and their relatives (Arecinae, Arecaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 39: 598-618.
31. Lopez-Fernandez, H., Honeycutt, R.L., Stiassny, M.L. & Winemiller, K.O. 2005. Morphology, molecules, and character congruence in the phylogeny of South American geophagine cichlids (Perciformes, Labroidei). Zool. Scripta 34: 627-651.
32. Maddison, D. & Maddison, W. 2000. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland.
33. Moore, H.E. 1971. The genus Synechanthus (Palmae). Principes 15: 10-19.
34. Moore, H.E. 1973. The major groups of palms and their distribution. Gentes Herb. 11: 27-141.
35. Moore, H.E. 1978. The genus Hyophorbe (Palmae). Gentes Herb. 11: 212-245.
36. Nixon, K.C. & Carpenter, J.M. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12: 221-241.
37. Norup, M.V., Dransfield, J., Chase, M.W., Barfod, A.S., Fernando, E.S. & Baker, W.J. 2006. Homoplasious character combinations and generic delimitation: a case study from the Indo-Pacific arecoid palms (Arecaceae: Areceae). Amer. J. Bot. 93: 1065-1080.
38. Olesen, J.M. & Balslev, H. 1990. Flower biology and pollinators of the Amazonian monoecious palm Geonoma macrostachys: a case of Bakerian mimicry. Principes 34: 181-190.
39. Olmstead, R.G. & Scotland, R.W. 2005. Molecular and morphological datasets. Taxon 54: 7-8. [Letter to the editor]
40. Quero, H.J. & Read, R.W. 1986. A revision of the palm genus Gaussia. Syst. Bot. 11: 145-154.
41. Renner, S.S. & Ricklefs, R.E. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Amer. J. Bot. 82: 331-348.
42. Renner, S.S. & Won, H. 2001. Repeated evolution of dioecy and monoecy in Siparunaceae (Laurales). Syst. Biol. 50: 700-712.
43. Scotland, R.W., Olmsted, R.G. & Bennett, R.J. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology. Syst. Biol. 52: 539-548.
44. Sorenson, M.D. 1999. TreeRot, version 2. Boston University, Boston. Available from http://people.bu.edu/msoren/Tree Rot.html
45. Stauffer, F.W., Baker, W.J., Dransfield, J. & Endress, P.K. 2004. Comparative floral structure and systematics of Pelagodoxa and Sommieria (Arecaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146: 27-39.
46. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland.
47. Thomas, M.M., Garwood, N.C., Baker, W.J., Henderson, S.A., Russell, S.J., Hodel, D.R. & Bateman, R.M. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the palm genus Chamaedorea, based on the low-copy nuclear genes PRK and RPB2. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 38: 398-415.
48. Tomlinson, P.B. 1961. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons, vol.2, Palmae. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
49. Uhl, N.W. 1978a. Floral anatomy of the five species of Hyophorbe (Palmae). Gentes Herb. 11: 246-267.
50. Uhl, N.W. 1978b. Leaf anatomy in the species of Hyophorbe (Palmae). Gentes Herb. 11: 268-283.
51. Uhl, N.W. & Dransfield, J. 1987. Genera Palmarum. L.H. Bailey Horticultorium and Allen Press, Lawrence.
52. Uhl, N.W. & Moore, H.E. 1978. The structure of the acervulus, the flower cluster of chamaedoreoid palms. Amer. J. Bot. 65: 197-204.
53. Vamosi, J.C., Otto, S.P. & Barret, S.C. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1006-1018.
54. Wahlberg, N., Braby, M.F., Brower, A.V., deJong, R., Lee, M.M., Nylin, S., Pierce, N.E., Sperling, F.A., Vila, R., Warren, A.D. & Zakharov, E. 2005. Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 272: 1577-1586.
55. Weiblen, G.D., Oyama, R.K. & Donoghue, M.J. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of dioecy in monocotyledons. Amer. Naturalist 155: 46-58.
56. Whittall, J.B., Carlson, M.L., Beardsley, P.M., Meinke, R.J. & Liston, A. 2006. The Mimulus moschatus alliance (Phrymaceae): molecular and morphological phylogenetics and their conservation implications. Syst. Bot. 31: 380-397.
57. Wiens, J.J. 2004. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 53: 653-661.
58. Wiens, J.J., Chippindale, P.T. & Hillis, D.M. 2003. When are phylogenetic analyses mislead by convergence? A case study of Texas cave salamanders. Syst. Biol. 52: 501-514.
59. Zona, S. 1996. Roystonea (Arecaceae: Arecoideae). Flora Neotropica Monographs, vol. 71. New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx.
60. Zona, S. 1999. New perspectives on generic limits and rela- tionships in the Ptychospermatinae (Palmae: Arecoideae). Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 83: 255-263.
61. Zona, S. 2003. Endosperm condition and the paradox of Ptychococcus paradoxus. Telopea 10: 1-7.