Clinical competencies and the basic sciences: An online case tutorial paradigm for delivery of integrated clinical and basic science content

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 238-243

  DiLullo, Camille ^a   Morris, Harry J ^a   Kriebel, Richard M ^a  

^a PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Basic science; Clinical skills; Competencies; Curriculum; Integration; Medical education; Problem based learning; Self directed; Teaching methods

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COURSE CONTENT; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LEARNING STYLE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING; TEACHING;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 70849132231     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.97     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allen KL, More FG. 2004. Clinical simulation and foundation skills: An integrated multidisciplinary approach to teaching. J Dent Educ 68:468-474.
2. Carmichael SW, Pawlina W. 2000. Animated powerpoint as a tool to teach anatomy. Anat Rec 261B:83-88.
3. Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. 2002. Web-based learning: Sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med 77:S86-S93. (Pubitemid 35155213)
4. Coppus SF, Emparanza JI, Hadley J, Kulier R, Weinbrenner S, Arvanitis TN, Burls A, Cabello JB, Decsi T, Horvath AR, Kaczor M, Zanrei G, Pierer K, Stawiarz K, Kunz R, Mol BW, Khan KS. 2007. A clinically integrated curriculum in evidence-based medicine for just-in-time learning through on-the -job training: The EU-EBM project. BMC Med Educ 7:46-56.
5. Dangerfield P, Bradley P, Gibbs T. 2000. Learning gross anatomy in a clinical skills course. Clin Anat 13:444-447.
6. Davis RC, Smith HJ. 1933. Determinants of feeling tone in type faces. J Appl Psychol 17:742-764.
7. DiLullo C, Coughlin P, D'Angelo M, McGuinness M, Bandle J, Slotkin EM, Shainker SA, Wenger C, Berray SJ. 2006. Anatomy in a new curriculum: Facilitating the learning of gross anatomy using web access streaming dissection videos. J Vis Commun Med 29:99-108.
8. Drake RL. 2007. A unique, innovative and clinically oriented approach to anatomy education. Acad Med 82:475-478.
9. Khalil MK, Lamar CH, Johnson TE. 2005. Using computer-based interactive imagery strategies for designing instructional anatomy programs. Clin Anat 18:68-76.
10. Kneebone R, Bello F, Nestel D, Yadollahi F, Darzi A. 2007. Training and assessment of procedural skills in context using an Integrated Procedural Performance Instrument (IPPI). Stud Health Technol Inform 125:229-231.
11. Lee A, Joynt GM, Ho AM, Gin T, Hazlett CB. 2007. Effect of an integrated teaching intervention on clinical decision analysis: A randomized, controlled study of undergraduate medical students. Med Teach 29:231-236. (Pubitemid 47272734)
12. Levine MG, Stempak J, Conyers G, Walters JA. 1999. Implementing and integrating computer-based activities into a problem-based gross anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat 12:191-198. (Pubitemid 29236885)
13. Ogur B, Hirsh D, Krupat E, Bor D. 2007. The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge integrated clerkship: An innovative model of clinical education. Acad Med 82:397-404. (Pubitemid 46597453)
14. Panzarella KJ, Manyon AT. 2007. A model for integrated assessment of clinical competence. J Allied Health 36:157-164.
15. Prince M, Felder R. 2007. The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. J Coll Sci Teach 36:14-20.
16. Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB, O'Brien M, Haims A, Rando W, Abrahams J, Dunne S, Wang S, Aden M. 2006. Design principles for developing an efficient clinical anatomy course. Med Teach 28:142-151. (Pubitemid 43771963)
17. Rowe CL. 1982. The connotative dimension of selected display typefaces. Inf Des J 3:30-37.
18. Tannenbaum PH, Jacobson HK, Norris EL. 1964. An experimental investigation of typeface connotations. Journal Q 41:65-73.
19. Walker P, Smith S, Livingston A. 1986. Predicting the appropriateness of a typeface on the basis of its multi-modal features. Inf Des J 5:29-42.
20. Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. 2005. The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: Creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Med Educ 39:107-112.
21. Woods NN, Neville AJ, Levinson AJ, Howey EH, Oczkowski WJ, Norman GR. 2006. The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis. Acad Med 81:S124-S127.