Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 136, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 822-832

  Flores Mir, Carlos ^a   Barnett, Gregory ^b   Higgins, Duncan W ^a   Heo, Giseon ^a   Major, Paul W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Delta ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; ORTHODONTICS, INTERCEPTIVE; PALATAL EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70749148360     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.021     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Proffit W., and Fields H. Contemporary orthodontics (2007), Mosby, St Louis
2. O'Brien K., Wright J., Conboy F., Sanjie Y., Mandall N., Chadwick S., et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 128-137
3. Tulloch J.F., Proffit W.R., and Phillips C. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125 (2004) 657-667
4. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 82 (1982) 104-113
5. Franchi L., Baccetti T., and McNamara Jr. J.A. Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115 (1999) 429-438
6. Leonardi M., Armi P., Baccetti T., Franchi L., and Caltabiano M. Mandibular growth in subjects with infraoccluded deciduous molars: a superimposition study. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 927-934
7. Melsen B. The cranial base. Acta Odontol Scand 32 (1974) 1-126
8. Lin L., Hedayat A., Sinha B., and Yang M. Statistical methods in assessment agreement: models, issues, and tools. J Am Stat Assoc 97 (2002) 257-270
9. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students (1940), George Allen & Unwin, London, United Kingdom
10. Bishara S.E., Fahl J.A., and Peterson L.C. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications. Am J Orthod 84 (1983) 133-139
11. Ochoa B.K., and Nanda R.S. Comparison of maxillary and mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125 (2004) 148-159
12. Mills C.M., and McCulloch K.J. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114 (1998) 15-24
13. Pancherz H., Ruf S., and Kohlhas P. "Effective condylar growth" and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114 (1998) 437-446
14. Berger J.L., Pangrazio-Kulbersh V., George C., and Kaczynski R. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 451-464
15. Ruf S., and Pancherz H. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. A prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects. Eur J Orthod 28 (2006) 352-360
16. Cope J.B., Buschang P.H., Cope D.D., Parker J., and Blackwood III H.O. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper jumper therapy. Angle Orthod 64 (1994) 113-122
17. Covell Jr. D.A., Trammell D.W., Boero R.P., and West R. A cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper jumper appliance. Angle Orthod 69 (1999) 311-320
18. Nalbantgil D., Arun T., Sayinsu K., and Fulya I. Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper jumper appliance in late adolescence. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 426-436
19. Jasper J.J., and McNamara Jr. J.A. The correction of interarch malocclusions using a fixed force module. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108 (1995) 641-650
20. Weiland F.J., and Bantleon H.P. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper jumper appliance-a preliminary report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108 (1995) 341-350
21. Mills C.M., and McCulloch K.J. Case report: modified use of the Jasper jumper appliance in a skeletal Class II mixed dentition case requiring palatal expansion. Angle Orthod 67 (1997) 277-282
22. Karacay S., Akin E., Olmez H., Gurton A.U., and Sagdic D. Forsus nitinol flat spring and Jasper jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 76 (2006) 666-672
23. Flores-Mir C., Ayeh A., Goswani A., and Charkhandeh S. Skeletal and dental changes in Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with splint-type Herbst appliances: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 77 (2007) 376-381
24. Barnett G., Higgins D., Major P., and Flores-Mir C. Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusions: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 78 (2008) 361-369
25. Lagravere M., Major P., and Flores-Mir C. Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 1046-1052
26. Pancherz H. The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod 3 (1997) 232-243
27. Du X., Hägg U., and Rabie A.B. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 24 (2002) 167-174
28. de Almeida M.R., Henriques J.F., de Almeida R.R., Weber U., and McNamara Jr. J.A. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 540-547
29. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J Suppl 15 (1982) 189-196
30. Pancherz H., and Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 8 (1986) 215-228
31. Weiland F.J., Ingervall B., Bantleon H.P., and Droacht H. Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper jumper. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112 (1997) 19-27
32. Stucki N., and Ingervall B. The use of the Jasper jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition. Eur J Orthod 20 (1998) 271-281
33. Heinig N., and Goz G. Clinical application and effects of the Forsus spring. A study of a new Herbst hybrid. J Orofac Orthop 62 (2001) 436-450
34. Kucukkeles N., Ilhan I., and Orgun A. Treatment efficiency in skeletal Class II patients treated with the Jasper jumper. Angle Orthod 77 (2007) 449-456
35. Stromeyer E.L., Caruso J.M., and DeVincenzo J.P. A cephalometric study of the Class II correction effects of the Eureka Spring. Angle Orthod 72 (2002) 203-210