Short-term treatment effects produced by the herbst appliance in the mixed dentition

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 540-547

  Rodrigues De Almeida, Marcio ^a,b   Henriques, José Fernando Castanha ^a   Rodrigues De Almeida, Renato ^a,b   Ursi, Weber ^c   McNamara, James A ^d,e,f,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b METHODIST UNIVERSITY OF PIRACICABA   (Brazil)

^c SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^d School of Dentistry

^e School of Medicine

^f UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^g University of Michigan ^*

Author keywords

Class II division 1 malocclusion; Early treatment; Functional orthopedics; Herbst appliance; Mixed dentition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 21644453658     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. McNamara JA Jr, Brudon WL. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Ann Arbor, Mich: Needham Press, 2001.
2. Faltin K Jr, Faltin RM, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Ghiozzi B, McNamara JA Jr. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:221-230.
3. Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979;76:423-442.
4. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance - its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:1-20.
5. Pancherz H. The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 1981;3:49-60.
6. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104-113.
7. Pancherz H. The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:220-233.
8. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:215-228.
9. Hansen K, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance treatment in relation to normal growth development. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:285-295.
10. Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:138-147.
11. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:510-520.
12. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:134-144.
13. Windmiller EC. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104:73-84.
14. Lai M, McNamara JA Jr. An evaluation of two phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy. Semin Orthod. 1998;4:46-58.
15. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:134-144.
16. Bakke M, Paulsen HV. Herbst treatment in "late" adolescence: clinical electromyographic, kinesiographic and radiographic analysis of one case. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:397-407.
17. Hansen K, Pancherz H, Hägg U. Long term effects of the Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13:471-481.
18. Konik M, Pancherz H, Hansen K. The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:87-91.
19. Hägg U, Du X, Rabie ABM. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:477-485.
20. Baltromejus S, Ruf S, Pancherz H. Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod. 2002;14:627-637.
21. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the "early" mixed dentition. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:1-13.
22. Wieslander L. Long term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the "early" mixed dentition: stability or relapse? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104:319-329.
23. Küçükkeles N, Arun T. Bio-thermal Herbst application during the mixed dentition period. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1994;18:253-258.
24. Croft RS, Buschang PH, English JD, Meyer R. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:435-443.
25. O'Reilly M, Yannielo GJ. Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae - a longitudinal cephalometric study. Angle Orthod. 1988;58:179-184.
26. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382-390.
27. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:429-438.
28. McNamara JA Jr, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:91-110.
29. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment timing for twin block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:159-170.
30. Baccetti T, Franchi L. Maximizing esthetic and functional changes in Class II treatment by appropriate treatment timing. In: McNamara JA Jr, Kelly KA, eds. Frontiers of Dental and Facial Esthetics. Monograph 38, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, Mich: Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry and Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 2001; 237-251.
31. Janson GRP, Toruño JLA, Martins DR, Henriques JFC, Freitas MR. Class II treatment effects of the Fränkel appliance. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:301-309.
32. Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:62-72.
33. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982;15:189-196.
34. Ruf S, Pancherz H. The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:225-229.
35. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:449-469.
36. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Mandibular anchorage in Herbst treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:149-164.
37. von Bremen J, Pancherz H. Efficiency of early and late Class II division 1 treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:31-37.
38. Ruf S, Pancherz H. When is the ideal period for Herbst therapy - early or late? Semin Orthod. 2003;9:47-56.