Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. A prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 352-360

  Ruf, Sabine ^a,b   Pancherz, Hans ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Abt Oralchirurgie Zahnaerztliche P   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; FACIAL BONE; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SKULL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKULL;

EID: 33747875685     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji116     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akgül A A, Toygar T U 2002 Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 122: 512-522
2. Behrents R G 1985 Growth of the aging craniofacial skeleton. Monograph No. 17, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
3. Bhatia S N, Leighton B C 1993 A manual of facial growth. A computer analysis of longitudinal growth data. Oxford University Press, Oxford
4. Bishara S E, Peterson L, Bishara E C 1984 Changes in facial dimensions and relationships between the ages of 5 and 25 years. American Journal of Orthodontics 85: 238-252
5. Cassidy D W, Herbosa E G, Rotskoff K S, Johnston L E 1993 A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in "borderline" adults with Class II, division 1 malocclusions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 104: 455-470
6. Dahlberg G 1940 Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience Publications, New York
7. Gerzanic L, Jagsch R, Watzke I M 2002 Psychologic implications of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal Class II or Class III malocclusion. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 17: 75-81
8. Hägg U, Pancherz H 1988 Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance. European Journal of Orthodontics 10:169-176
9. Hägg U, Pancherz H, Taranger J 1987 Pubertal growth and orthodontic treatment. In: Carlson D S, Ribbens K A (eds) Craniofacial growth during adolescence, Monograph No. 20, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 87-115
10. Hägg U, Taranger J 1980 Skeletal stages of the hand and wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 38: 187-200
11. Hoppenreijs T J, Hakman E C, van 't Hof M A, Stoelinga P J, Tuinzing D B, Freihofer H P1999 Psychologic implications of surgical orthodontic treatment in patients with anterior open bite. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 14:101-112
12. Lawrence T N, Ellis E, McNamara JA 1985 The frequency and distribution of skeletal and dental components in Class II orthognathic surgery patients. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 43: 24-34
13. Lewis A B, Roche A F 1988 Late growth changes in the craniofacial skeleton. Angle Orthodontist 58: 127-135
14. Luecke P E, Johnston L E 1992 The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: testing the central dogma of 'functional orthodontics'. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 101: 4-12
15. McNamara J A, Peterson J E, Pancherz H 2003 Histologic changes associated with the Herbst appliance in adult rhesus monkeys (Macacca mulatto). Seminars in Orthodontics 9: 26-40
16. Mihalik C A, Proffit W R, Phillips C 2003 Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 123: 266-278
17. Pancherz H1982 The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. American Journal of Orthodontics 82: 104-113
18. Pancherz H 1994 Früh- oder Spätbehandlung mit der Herbst-ApparaturStabilität oder Rezidiv? Informationen aus Orthodontie und Kieferorthopädie 26:437-445
19. Pancherz H 1995 The Herbst appliance. Editorial Aguiram, Seville, Spain
20. Pancherz H 2000 Dentofacial orthopedics or orthognathic surgery: is it a matter of age? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 117: 571-574
21. Pancherz H, Hägg U 1985 Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 273-287
22. Pancherz H, Hansen K 1986 Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. European Journal of Orthodontics 8: 215-228
23. Pancherz H, Littmann C 1988 Somatische Reife und morphologische Veränderungen des Unterkiefers bei der Herbst-Behandlung. Informationen aus Orthodontie und Kieferorthopädic 20: 455-470
24. Pancherz H, Littmann C 1989 Morphologie und Lage des Unterkiefers bei der Herbst-Behandlung. Eine kephalomctrischc Analyse der Veränderungen bis zum Wachstumsabschluß. Informationen aus Orthodontie und Kieferorthopä die 21: 493-513
25. Pancherz H, Ruf S 2000 The Herbst appliance - research based updated clinical possibilities. World Journal of Orthodontics 1:17-31
26. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Erbe C, Hansen K 2004 The mechanism of Class II correction in surgical orthodontic treatment of adult Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthodontist 74: 798-807
27. Proffit W R, Phillips C, Douvartzidis N 1992 A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 101: 556-565
28. Ricketts R M 1968 Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. American Journal of Orthodontics 54: 272-289
29. Ruf S, Pancherz H 1996 The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 110: 225-229
30. Ruf S, Pancherz H 1998 Kiefergelenkwachstumsadaptation bei jungen Erwachsenen während Behandlung mit der Herbst-Apparatur. Eine prospektive magnetresonanztomographische und kephalometrische Studie. Informationen aus Orthodontie und Kieferorthopädie 30: 735-750
31. Ruf S, Pancherz H 1999a Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthodontist 69:239-246
32. Ruf S, Pancherz H 1999b Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometricradiographic investigation. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 115: 607-618
33. Ruf S, Pancherz H 2003 When is the ideal period for Herbst therapyearly or late. Seminars in Orthodontics 9: 47-56
34. Ruf S, Pancherz H 2004 Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II, division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 126: 140-152