Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early class II treatment

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 125, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 657-667

  Tulloch, J F Camilla ^a   Proffit, William R ^a   Phillips, Ceib ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; GROWTH; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PUBERTY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL CHILD; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTITION, MIXED; DENTITION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; ORTHODONTICS, INTERCEPTIVE; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; RESEARCH DESIGN; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 2942568233     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Keeling S.D., Wheeler T.T., King G.J., Garvan C.W., Cohen D.A., Cabassa S., et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 113:1998;40-50
2. Ghafari J., Shofer J.S., Jacobsson-Hunt U., Markowitz D.L., Laster L.L. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 113:1998;51-61
3. Ehmer U., Tulloch J.F.C., Proffit W.R., Phillips C. An international comparison of early treatment of Angle Class II/1 cases skeletal effects of the first phase of a prospective clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop/Fortschr Kieferorthop. 60:1999;392-408
4. Wheeler T.T., McGorray S.P., Dolce C., Taylor M.G., King G.J. Effectiveness of early treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 121:2002;9-17
5. O'Brien K.D., Wright J., Conboy F., Sanjie Y., Mandall N., Chadwick S., et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 124:2003;234-243
6. Tulloch J.F.C., Phillips C., Koch G., Proffit W.R. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 111:1997;391-400
7. Tulloch J.F.C., Proffit W.R., Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 111:1997;533-542
8. Fields H.W., Proffit W.R., Nixon W.L., Phillips C., Stanek E. Facial pattern differences in long face children and adults. Am J Orthod. 85:1984;217-223
9. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2003
10. Richmond S., Shaw W.C., Roberts C.D., Andrews M. The PAR index (peer assessment rating) methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod. 14:1992;180-187
11. King G.J., McGorray S.P., Wheeler T.T., Dolce G., Taylor M. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 123:2003;489-496
12. Moses L.E. Assessing medical technologies. 1985;National Academy Press, Washington, DC. p. 70-9.
13. McKnight M.M., Daniels C.P., Johnston L.E. Jr. A retrospective study of two-stage treatment outcomes assessed with two modified PAR indices. Angle Orthod. 68:1998;521-524