Treatment efficiency in skeletal Class II patients treated with the Jasper Jumper: A cephalometric evaluation

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 449-456

  Küçükkeleş, Nazan ^a   Ilhan, Işil ^a   Orgun, I Ata ^b  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Class II correction; Functional treatment; Jasper Jumper

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248149898     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0449:TEISCI]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ingerval B. Prevalence of dental and occlusal anomalies in Swedish conscripts. Acta Odontol Scand. 1974;32:83-92.
2. Kim YH. A comparative cephalometric study of Class II div 1 nonextraction and extraction cases. Br J Orthod. 1979;49:77-84.
3. McNamara JA. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:177-202.
4. Bishara SE, Ziaja RR. Functional appliances: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:250-258.
5. Woodside DG. Do functional appliances have an orthopedic effect? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:11-14.
6. Quintao C, Brunharo IH, Menezes RC, Almeida MA. Soft tissue facial profile changes following functional appliance therapy. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:35-41.
7. Stromeyer EL, Caruso JM, DeVincenzo JP. A cephalometric study of the Class II correction effects of the Eureka Spring. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:203-210.
8. Lai M, McNamara JA Jr. An evaluation of two phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy. Semin Orthod. 1998;4:46-58.
9. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:286-295.
10. Weiland FJ, Droschl H. Treatment of a Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with the Jasper Jumper: a case report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:1-7.
11. Pancherz H, Ruf S. When is the ideal period for Herbst therapy - early or late? Semin Orthod. 2003;9:47-56.
12. Cope JB, Bushang PH, Cope DD, Parker J, Blackwood HO. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy. Angle Orthod. 1994;64:113-122.
13. Nalbantgil D, Arun T, Say?nsu K, Iş?k F. Skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:426-436.
14. Stucki N, Ingervall B. The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:271-281.
15. Covell DA, Trammell DW, Boero RP, West R. A cephalometric study of Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:311-320.
16. Weiland FJ, Bantleon HP. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance-a preliminary report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:341-350.
17. Blackwood HO. Clinical management of the Jasper Jumper. J Clin Orthod. 1991;25:755-760.
18. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA, Hunter WS. An Atlas of Craniofacial Growth: Cephalometric Standards From the University School Growth Study, the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan 1974.
19. Pancherz H, Haag U. The Herbst appliance - its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:1-20.
20. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104-113.
21. American Orthodontics. Jasper Jumper: fixed functional appliance. American Orthodontics Instructional Pamphlet. 1996;1:1-16.
22. Gianelly AA, Arena SA, Bernstein L. A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise and Fränkel appliances. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:269-276.
23. Stöckli PW, Willert HW. Tissue reactions in the temporo-mandibular joint resulting from anterior displacement of the mandible in the monkey. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:142-155.
24. Birkebaek B, Melsen B, Terp S. A laminographic study of the alterations in the temporo-mandibular joint following activator treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6:257-266.
25. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:181-198.
26. Arat ZM, Gökalp H, Erdem D, Erden İ. Changes in the TMJ disc-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal Class II division 1 malocclusion: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:316-319.
27. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:1-13.
28. Aksoy AUdie; , Ciǧer S. Herbst apareyi uygulanan s?n?f II bölüm 1 maloklüzyonlu bireylerde, dentofasial sistemdeki deǧişikliklerin sefalometrik olarak incelenmesi. H.Ü Dişhek Fak Derg. 1985;2:72-79.
29. Ülgen M. Angle Class II div 1 anomalilerde aktivatör ve servikal headgear tedavisinin diş, çene yüz iskeletine etkilerinin sefalometrik olarak incelenmesi ve karşilaştirilmasi. [In Turkish]. Doçentlik tezi, Ankara, Turkey: 1978.