Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type herbst appliance on class II division 1 malocclusion

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 361-369

  Barnett, Gregory A ^a   Higgins, Duncan W ^a   Major, Paul W ^b   Flores Mir, Carlos ^b  

^a University of Alberta ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Functional appliances; Herbst; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749105238     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/031107-123.1     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Proffit WR, Fields HWJ. Contemporary Orthodontics. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2002.
2. Baume LJ, Derichsweiler H. Is the condylar growth center responsive to orthodontic therapy? An experimental study in Macaca mulatta. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1961; 14:347-362.
3. Elgoyhen JC, Moyers RE, McNamara JA Jr, Riolo ML. Craniofacial adaptation of protrusive function in young rhesus monkeys. Am J Orthod. 1972;62:469-480.
4. Thomas PM. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery in the treatment of mandibular deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:579-587.
5. Aelbers CM, Dermaut LR. Orthopedics In orthodontics: part I, fiction or reality - a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 110:513-519.
6. Collett AR. Current concepts on functional appliances and mandibular growth stimulation. Aust Dent J. 2000;45:173-178.
7. McSherry PF, Bradley H. Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques. J Orthod. 2000;27:219-225.
8. Chen JY, Will LA, Niederman R. Analysis of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:470-476.
9. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:128-137.
10. Pancherz H. The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod. 1997;3:232-243.
11. Flores-Mir C, Major MP, Major PW. Soft tissue changes with fixed functional appliances in Class II division 1 cases: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:712-720.
12. Flores-Mir C, Ayeh A, Goswani A, Charkhandeh S. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects in Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with splint-type Herbst appliance: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:376-381.
13. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, de Toffol L, McNamara JA. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:599.e1-12.
14. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Frankel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:134-144.
15. Berger JL, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, George C, Kaczynski R. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:451-464.
16. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982; 15:189-196.
17. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104-113.
18. de Almeida MR, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, Weber U, McNamara JA Jr. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:540-547.
19. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod. 1971; 60:111-127.
20. Athanasiou A. Orthodontic Cephalometry. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1995.
21. Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Heo G, Major PW. Longitudinal study of temporomandibular joint disc status and craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130: 324-330.
22. Dermaut LR, Aelbers CM. Orthopedics in orthodontics: fiction or reality. A review of the literature - part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:667-671.
23. Shen G, Hagg U, Darendeliler M. Skeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible - removable vs. fixed functional appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2005;8:2-10.
24. Rudzki-Janson I, Noachtar R. Functional appliance therapy with the Bionator. Semin Orthod. 1998;4:33-45.
25. Jacobs T, Sawaengkit P. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research efficacy trials of Bionator Class II treatment: a review. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:571-575.
26. Bjork A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42:400-411.
27. Meikle MC. Guest editorial: what do prospective randomized clinical trials tell us about the treatment of Class II malocclusions? A personal viewpoint. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27: 105-114.
28. Hagg U, Attstrom K. Mandibular growth estimated by four cephalometric measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:146-152.
29. Flores-Mir C. Can we extract useful scientifically sound information from retrospective non-randomized trials to be applied in orthodontic evidence-based practice treatments? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. In press.