Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 685-712

  Damian, Markus F ^a   Dumay, Nicolas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Phonological encoding; Repetition priming; Spoken production

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LATENT PERIOD; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 70549092068     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960802351260     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor].
2. Collins, A. F., & Ellis, A. W. (1992). Phonological priming of lexical retrieval in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 375-388.
3. Damian, M. F. (2003). Articulatory duration in single word speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 416-431.
4. Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2007). Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 195-209.
5. Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535-557.
6. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
7. Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production: a theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science, 17, 149-195.
8. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.
9. Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 708-723.
10. Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57-84.
11. Fischman, M. G., & Lim, C. H. (1991). Influence of extended practice on programming time, movement time, and transfer in simple target-striking responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 39-50.
12. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35, 116-124.
13. Frankish, C., & Turner, E. (2007). SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 189-211.
14. Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The nonanomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27-52.
15. Fudge, E. C. (1987). Branching structure within the syllable. Journal of Linguistics, 23, 359-377.
16. Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 133-177). New York: Academic Press.
17. Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2003). Effects of vocabulary acquisition on lexical competition in speech perception and production. In M. J. Solé, D. Recasens, & J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th ICPhS Conference (pp. 1485-1488). Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions.
18. Hulstijn, W., & van Galen, G. P. (1983). Programming in handwriting: Reaction-time and movement time as a function of sequence length. Acta Psychologica, 54, 23-49.
19. Inhoff, A. W., Rosenbaum, D. A., Gordon, A. M., & Campbell, J. A. (1984). Stimulus response compatibility and motor programming of manual response sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 724-733.
20. Janssen, N., Alario, F. X., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A word-order constraint on phonological activation. Psychological Science, 19, 216-220.
21. Kemeny, S., Xu, J., Park, G. H., Hosey, L. A., Wettig, C. M., & Braun, A. R. (2006). Temporal dissociation of early lexical access and articulation using a delayed naming task An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 587-595.
22. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
23. MacKay, D. G. (1970). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia, 8, 323-350.
24. MacKay, D. G. (1972). The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 210-227.
25. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
26. Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2007). Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory and Cognition, 35, 494-503.
27. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.
28. Meyer, D. E., & Gordon, P. C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 224, 3-26.
29. Monsell, S. (1986). Programming of complex sequences: Evidence from the timing of rapid speech and other productions. In H. Heuer & R. A. Schmidt (Eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 72-86). Berlin: Springer.
30. Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 555-563.
31. Navarrete, E., & Costa, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 357-378.
32. Nooteboom, S., & Quené, H. (2008). Self-monitoring and feedback: A new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 837-861.
33. O'Seaghda, P. G., Dell, G. S., Peterson, R., & Juliano, C. (1992). Models of form-related priming in comprehension and production. In R. G. Reilly & N. E. Sharkey (Eds.), Connectionist approaches to natural language processing (pp. 373-408). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Pashler, H. (1994). Overlapping mental operations in serial performance with preview. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 161-191.
35. Portier, S. J., van Galen, G. P., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (1990). Practice and the dynamics of handwriting performance: Evidence for a shift of motor programming load. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 474-492.
36. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829-841.
37. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
38. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
39. Rastle, K., Croot, K. P., Harrington, J. M., & Coltheart, M. (2005). Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: Consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1083-1095.
40. Rayner, K., & Posnansky, C. (1978). Stages of processing in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 64-80.
41. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64,249-284.
42. Roelofs, A. (1999). Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 173-200.
43. Roelofs, A. (2008). Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34, 353-368.
44. Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (1999). Phonological facilitation in the production of two-word utterances. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 17-50.
45. Schriefers, H., de Ruiter, J. P., & Steigerwald, M. (1999). Parallelism in the production of noun phrases: experiments and reaction time models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 702-720.
46. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
47. Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53, 91-127.
48. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1987). The role of word onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence from speech error patterns. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Motor and sensory processing language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
50. Starreveld, P. A. (2000). On the interpretation of onsets of auditory context effects in word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 497-525.
51. Stemberger, J. P. (1982). The lexicon in a model of language production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
52. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
53. Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., Monsell, S., & Wright, C. E. (1988). Motor programs and hierarchical organization in the control of rapid speech. Phonetica, 45, 175-197.
54. Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control learning (pp. 117-152). New York: Academic Press.
55. Sullivan, M. P., & Riffel, B. (1999). The nature of phonological encoding during spoken word retrieval. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 15-45.
56. Verwey, W. B. (1993). Effects of extended practice in a one finger keypressing task. Acta Psychologica, 84, 179-197.
57. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 735-747.
58. Wheeldon, L. (2003). Inhibitory form priming of spoken word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 81-109.
59. Yaniv, I., Meyer, D. E., Gordon, P. C., Huft, C. A., & Sevald, C. A. (1990). Vowel similarity, connectionist models, and syllable structure in motor programming of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 1-26.