Nonhumans in social interaction

Annual Review of Sociology

Volumn 35, Issue , 2009, Pages 531-552

  Cerulo, Karen A ^a  

^a Camden Campus of Rutgers The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

Actor network theory; Cognition; Culture; Interactionism; Technological change; Time perspective

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450241745     PISSN: 03600572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120008     Document Type: Article

References (196)

1. Akrich M. 1992. The de-scription of technical objects. In Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, ed.WBijker, J Law, pp. 205-224 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
2. Alger JM, Alger SM. 2003. Cat Culture: The SocialWorld of a Cat Shelter. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press
3. Allis S. 2004. Artificial emotion. Boston Globe, Feb. 29. http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/ articles/2004/02/29/artificial emotion?mode=PF
4. Al-Natour S, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli RT. 2006. The role of design characteristics in shaping perceptions of similarity: The case of online shopping assistants. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7(12):821-861
5. Alter A. 2007. My virtual summer job. Wall Street Journal, May 16. http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB121088619095596515-21acPmGVGZpGVJcQJmeNM- G88Q-20090516.html?mod=rss-free
6. APPA (American Pet Products Association). 2008. Industry statistics and trends. http://www. americanpetproducts.org/press industrytrends.asp
7. Appadurai A. 1986. The Social Life of Things. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
8. Arluke A, Sanders CR. 1996. Regarding Animals. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press
9. Barrett JL. 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God?Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
10. Barrett JL, Keil FC. 1996. Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cogn. Psychol. 31(3):219-247
11. Bender C. 2008. How does God answer back? Poetics 36(5-6):476-492
12. Bendiksen R, Fulton R. 1975. Death and the child: An anterospective test of the childhood bereavement and later behavior disorder hypothesis. Omega 6(1):45-59
13. Berger P, Luckmann T. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor
14. Berlinsky EB, Biller HB. 1984. Parental Death and Psychological Development. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath
15. Bernstein D, Crowley K, Nourbakhsh I. 2007. Working with a robot: Exploring relationship potential in human-robot systems. Interact. Stud. 8(3):465-482
16. Biblarz TJ, Gottainer G. 2000. Family structure and children's success: A comparison of widowed and divorced single-mother families. J. Marriage Fam. 62(2):533-548
17. Bickle J. 1997. Mind-brain continuum. Philos. Psychol. 10(4):523-530
18. Black N. 2007. Poll: 9 of 10 Americans believe in God; nearly half reject evolution. Christian Post, April 2. http://www.christianpost.com/article/ 20070402/26658 Poll:9-of-10-Americans-Believein-God;-Nearly-Half-Rejects- Evolution.htm
19. Blanton D. 2004. More believe in God than heaven. Foxnews.com, June 18. http://www.foxnews. com/story/0,2933,99945,00.html
20. Blumer H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
21. Boellstorff T. 2008. Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
22. Bonanno GA, Wortman CB, Lehman DR, Tweed RG, Haring M, et al. 2002. Resilience to loss and chronic grief: A prospective study from preloss to 18-months postloss. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 83(5):1150-1164
23. Bonanno GA, Wortman CB, Nesse RM. 2004. Prospective patterns of resilience and maladjustment during widowhood. Psychol. Aging 19(2):260-271
24. Bourdieu P. 1972. Outline of a Theory of Practice, transl. R Nice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
25. Boyd JN, Zimbardo PG. 1997. Constructing time after death: The transcendental-future time perspective. Time Soc. 6(1):35-54
26. Boyer P. 1996. What makes anthropomorphism unnatural: Intuitive ontology and cultural representations. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 2(1):83-97
27. Brave S, Nass C, Hutchinson K. 2005. Computers that care: Investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied conversational agent. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 62(1):161-178
28. Breazeal C. 2002. Designing Sociable Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
29. Breazeal C. 2003. Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59(1-2):119-155
30. Breslau D. 2000. Sociology after humanism: A lesson from contemporary science studies. Sociol. Theory 18(2):289-307
31. Callon M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? ed. J Law, pp. 196-233. Boston: Routledge
32. Callon M. 1987. Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, ed. WE Bijker, TP Hughes, TJ Pinch, pp. 83-103. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
33. Carley KM, Newell A. 1994. The nature of the social agent. J. Math. Sociol. 19:221-262
34. Carr D, Nesse R,Wortman CB, eds. (2006). Spousal Bereavement in Late Life. New York: Springer
35. Cassell J, Tartaro A. 2007. Intersubjectivity in human-agent interaction. Interact. Stud. 8(3):391-410
36. Castronova E. 2004. The price of bodies: A hedonic pricing model of avatar attributes in a synthetic world. Kyklos 57(2):173-196
37. Cerulo KA, Barra A. 2008. In the name of...: Legitimate interactants in the dialogue of prayer. Poetics 35(5-6):374-388
38. Cerulo KA, Ruane JM. 1997. Death comes alive: Technology and the re-conception of death. Sci. Cult. 6:444-466
39. Chayko M. 2002. Connecting: How We Form Social Bonds and Communities in the Internet Age. Albany: SUNY Press
40. Cohen J. 1989. About steaks liking to be eaten: Views of symbolic interactionists andTalcott Parsons concerning the nature of relationships between persons and nonhuman objects. Symb. Interact. 12(2):191-213
41. Collins HM, Yearly S. 1992. Epistemological chicken. In Science as Practice and Culture, ed. A Pickering, pp. 301-326 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
42. Collins R. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
43. Csikszentmihalyi M, Rochberg-Halton E. 1981. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
44. D'Andrade R. 1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
45. Dant T. 2004. The driver-car. Theory Cult. Soc. 21(4-5):61-79
46. Denzin NK. 1980. A phenomenology of emotion and deviance. Zeitschrift fur Soziologie 9(3):251-261
47. DiMaggio P. 1997. Culture and cognition. Am. Rev. Sociol. 23:263-288
48. DiMaggio P. 2002. Why cognitive (and cultural) sociology needs cognitive psychology. In Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture and Cognition, ed. KA Cerulo, pp. 274-281 New York: Routledge
49. Durkheim E. 1965 [1915]. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, transl. JW Swain. New York: Free Press
50. Elster J. 1984. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
51. Elster J. 2000. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
52. Emirbayer M, Mische A. 1998. What is agency? Am. J. Sociol. 103(4):962-1023
53. Epel E, Bandura A, Zimbardo PG. 1999. Escaping homelessness: The influence of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29(3):575-596
54. Fell-Seifer D, Skinner K, Mataric MJ. 2007. Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics. Interact. Stud. 8(3):423-439
55. Fogg BJ, Nass C. 1997. Silicon sycophants: The effects of computers that flatter. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46:551-561
56. Fuller S. 2000. Why science studies has never been critical of science: Some recent lessons on how to be a helpful nuisance and a harmless radical. Philos. Soc. Sci. 30(1):5-32
57. Garfinkel H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
58. Gibbon J. 2008. God is great, God is good: Teaching God concepts in Turkish Islamic sermons. Poetics 36(5-6):389-403
59. Goffman E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday/Anchor
60. Gomart E, Hennion A. 1999. A sociology of attachment: Music amateurs, drug users. In Actor Network Theory and After, ed. J Law, J Hassard, pp. 220-247 Oxford: Blackwell/Sociol. Rev.
61. Griffin DR. 1994. Animal Minds. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
62. Guest T. 2007. Second Lives: A Journey through Virtual Worlds. New York: Random House
63. Habermas J. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon
64. Habermas J. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge, UK: Polity
65. Hacking I. 1999a. The Social Construction of What? London: Harvard Univ. Press
66. Hacking I. 1999b. When the trees talk back: A review of Pandora's Hope by Bruno Latour. Times Literary Suppl., Sept. 10, p. 13
67. Haraway D. 1985. A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and social feminism in the 1980s. Social. Rev. 80:65-107
68. Haraway D. 1991. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, pp. 149-181 New York: Routledge
69. Harris Poll. 2007. Pets are "members of the family" and two-thirds of pet owners buy their pets holiday presents. Harris Interact., Dec. 4. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris poll/index.asp?PID=840
70. Hetherington K. 1999. From blindness to blindness: Museums, heterogeneity and the subject. In Actor Network Theory and After, ed. J Law, J Hassard, pp. 51-73. Oxford: Blackwell/Sociol. Rev.
71. Hewitt J. 2003. Symbols, objects, and meanings. In Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, ed. LT Reynold, MJ Herman-Kinney, pp. 307-26.Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
72. Hoevel A. 2006. U.S. is a nation of 360 million-pets. CNN.com, March 17. http://www.cnn.com/ 2006/US/03/10/modern.pets/index.html
73. Holtgraves TM, Ross SJ, Weywadt CR, Hans TL. 2007. Perceiving artificial social agents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(5):2163-2174
74. Homans GC. 1974. Elementary Forms of Social Behavior. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 2nd ed.
75. Irvine L. 2004a. If You Tame Me: Understanding Our Connection With Animals. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press
76. Irvine L. 2004b. A model of animal selfhood: Expanding interactionist possibilities. Symb. Interact. 27(1):3-21
77. Isaacson N. 2002. Pre-term babies in the 'mother machine': Metaphoric reasoning and bureaucratic rituals that finish the 'unfinished infant.' In Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture and Cognition, ed. KA Cerulo, pp. 89-100. New York: Routledge
78. Jerolmack C. 2005. Our animals, ourselves? Chipping away the human-animal divide. Sociol. Forum 20(4):651-660
79. Jerolmack C. 2009. Humans, animals, and play: Theorizing interaction when intersubjectivity is problematic. Sociol. Theory. In press
80. Jerolmack C, Porpora D. 2004. Religion, rationality, and experience: A response to the new rational choice theory of religion. Sociol. Theory 22(1):190-211
81. Johnston WA, Heinz SP. 1978. Flexibility and capacity demands of attention. J. Experiment. Psychol. Gen. 107:420-435
82. Jones MP. 1996. Posthuman agency: Between theoretical traditions. Sociol. Theory 14(3):290-309
83. Kant I. 1957 [1929]. Critique of pure reason. In Kant Selections, ed. TM Greene, pp. 1-60. New York: Charles Scribners
84. Keough KA, Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. 1999. Who's smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance abuse. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 21(2):149-164
85. Kiesler T, Kiesler S. 2004. My pet rock and me: An experimental exploration of the self extension concept. Adv. Consum. Res. 32:365-370
86. Klang M. 2004. Avatar: From deity to corporate property: A philosophical inquiry into digital property of online games. Inf. Commun. Soc. 7(3):389-402
87. Klass D. 1992. The inner representation of the dead child and the worldviews of bereaved parents. Omega 26(4):255-272
88. Knappett C. 2002. Photographs, skeuomorphs, and marionettes: Some thoughts on mind, agency and object. J. Mater. Cult. 7:97-117
89. Knappett C, Malafouris L. 2008. Material Agency: Toward a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer
90. Kollock P. 1999. The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In Communities in Cyberspace, ed. M Smith, P Kollock, pp. 220-229 London: Routledge
91. Latour B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA:Harvard Univ. Press
92. Latour B. 1988 [1984]. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard Univ. Press
93. Latour B. 1996. On interobjectivity. Mind Cult. Activity 3(4):228-245
94. Latour B. 1997.Onactor-network theory: A few clarifications. http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettimel-9801/msg00019.html
95. Latour B. 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
96. Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory.New York: Oxford Univ. Press
97. Law J. 1987. Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of the Portuguese expansion. In The Social Construction of Technical Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, ed.WEBjiker, TP Hughes, TJ Pinch, pp. 111-134 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
98. Law J. 1992. Notes on the theory of actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Syst. Pract. 5:379-393
99. Lee B. 2006. Empathy, androids, and 'authentic experience.' Connect. Sci. 18(4):419-428
100. Lee JER, Nass C, Brave SB, Monishima Y, Nakajima H, Yamada R. 2007. The case for caring colearners: The effects of a computer-mediated colearner agent on trust and learning. J. Commun. 57(2):183-204
101. Lee KM, Park N, Song H. 2005. Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Effects of a robot's long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people's social responses toward it. Hum. Commun. Res. 31:538-563
102. Lee N, Brown SD. 1994. Otherness and the actor-network. Am. Behav. Sci. 37(6):772-791
103. Lewin K. 1939. Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. Am. J. Sociol. 44:868-897
104. Lewin K. 1951. Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper & Row
105. Lewin K. 1997 [1942]. Resolving Social Conflicts and Field Theory in Social Science.Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
106. Libby LK, Eibach RP. 2002. Looking back in time: Self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 82(2):167-179
107. Lizardo O. 2007. Mirror neurons, collective objects and the problem of transmission: Reconsidering Stephen Turner's critique of practice theory. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 37:319-350
108. Loewenstein G. 2000. Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. Am. Econ. Rev. 90(2):426-432
109. Luhmann N. 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundrißeiner allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [1995. Social Systems, transl. J Bednarz Jr, D Baecker. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press]
110. Lyons L. 2005. One-third of Americans believe dearly may not have departed. Gallup, July 12. http://www.gallup.com/poll/17275/OneThird-Americans- Believe-Dearly-May-Departed.aspx
111. MacDonald WL. 1995. The effects of religiosity and structural strain on reported paranormal experiences. J. Sci. Stud. Religion 34(3):366-376
112. Macmillan D. 2007. Big spenders of Second Life. Business Week, April 16. http://www.businessweek. com/technology/content/apr2007/tc20070416 386810.htm
113. Masson JM, McCarthy S. 1996. When Elephants Weep: The Emotional Lives of Animals. New York: Delta
114. Mayer RE, Johnson WL, Shaw E, Sandhu S. 2006. Constructing computer based tutors that are socially sensitive: Politeness in educational software. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64(1):36-42
115. Mayer RE, Sobko K, Mautone PD. 2003. Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. J. Educ. Psychol. 95(2):419-425
116. McDonald DG, Kim H. 2001. When I die, I feel small: Electronic game characteristics and the social self. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 45(2):241-258
117. McLuhan M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill
118. Mead GH. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
119. Mische A. 2001. Juggling multiple futures: Personal and collective project-formation among Brazilian youth leaders. In Leadership and Social Movements, ed. A Johnson,CBarker,MLavalette, pp. 137-159 Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press
120. Mische A. 2009. Projects and possibilities: Researching futures in action. Sociol. Forum 24:3
121. Mol A. 1998. Missing links, making links: The performance of some arthroscleroses. In Differences in Medicine: Unravelling Practices, Techniques and Bodies, ed. A Mol, M Berg, pp. 144-165 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
122. Moon Y. 2000. Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. J. Consum. Res. 26(4):323-339
123. Moon Y, Morkes J, Kim EY, Fogg BJ. 1997. Computers are social actors. In Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, ed. B Friedman, pp. 72-78. Stanford, CA: CSLI
124. Moore DW. 2005. Three in four Americans believe in the paranormal. Gallup News Serv., June 16. http://www.gallup.com/poll/16915/Three-Four-Americans- Believe-Paranormal.aspx
125. Murdoch J. 2001. Ecologising sociology: Actor-network theory, co-construction, and the problem of human exceptionalism. Sociology 35(1):11-133
126. Myers OE Jr. 2003. No longer the lonely species: A post-Mead perspective on animals and sociology. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 23(3):46-68
127. Nanda K, Benbasat I. 2004. Para-social presence and communication capabilities of a web site: A theoretical perspective. e-Service J. 1(3):5-24
128. Nass C, Brave S. 2005. Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
129. Nass C, Fogg BJ, Moon Y. 1996. Can computers be teammates? Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 45(6):669-678
130. Nass C, Moon Y. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. J. Soc. Issues 56(1):81-103
131. Nass C, Moon Y, Carney P. 1999. Are respondents polite to computers? Social desirability and direct responses to computers. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29(5):1093-1110
132. Nass C, Moon Y, Fogg BJ, Reeves B, Dryer DC. 1995. Can computer personalities be human personalities? Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 40(3):223-239
133. Nass C, Moon Y, Green N. 1997. Are computers gender-neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 27(10):864-876
134. Nass C, Steuer J. 1993. Anthropomorphism, agency and ethopoeia: Computers as social actors. Hum. Commun. Res. 19(4):504-527
135. Nass C, Steuer J, Henriksen L, Dryer DC. 1994. Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: Performance assessments of computers subsequent to 'self ' or 'other' evaluations. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 40(3):543-559
136. Newport F. 2007. Americans more likely to believe in God than the devil, heaven more than hell. Gallup News Serv., June 13. http://www.gallup.com/poll/ 27877/Americans-More-Likely-Believe-God-Than-Devil-Heaven-More-Than-Hell.aspx
137. Nigro G, Neisser U. 1983. Point of view in personal memories. Cogn. Psychol. 15:467-482
138. Orsi RA. 2004. Between Heaven and Earth: The Religious Worlds People Make and the Scholars Who Study Them. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
139. Owens E. 2007. Nonbiological objects as actors. Symb. Interact. 30(4):567-584
140. Page G. 1999. Inside the Animal Mind:AGroundbreaking Exploration of Animal Intelligence.NewYork: Doubleday
141. Pardo I. 1996. Managing Existence in Naples: Morality, Action and Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
142. Parsons T. 1937. The Structure of Social Action, Vol.1. New York: Free Press
143. Payr S. 2001. The virtual other: Aspects of social interaction with synthetic characters. Appl. Artif. Intell. 15(6):493-519
144. Pertaub DP, Slater M, Barker C. 2002. An experiment on public speaking anxiety in response to three different types of virtual audience. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 11(1):68-78
145. Petside.com. 2008. AP-Petside Poll: Most owners say they can "talk" with pets. http://www.petside.com/thesidewalk/ news/ap-petside poll america prefers mutt over pure-bred for first family pup.php
146. Pew Foundation. 2006. Gauging family intimacy: Dogs edge cats (dads trail both). Pew Res. Cent Soc. Trends Rep., Pew Res. Cent,Washington, DC. http://pewsocialtrends.org/assets/pdf/Pets.pdf
147. Pickering A. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
148. Pickering A. 1993. The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. Am. J. Sociol. 99(3):559-589
149. Pollner M, McDonald-Wikler L. 1985. The social construction of unreality: A case study of family's attribution of competence to a severely retarded child. Fam. Process 24(2):241-1154
150. Popenoe D. 1996. Life without Father. New York: Free Press
151. Posner MI, Snyder CRR. 1975. Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In Attention and Performance V, ed. PMA Rabbit, S Dornic, pp. 669-698 London: Academic
152. Pronin E, Olivola CY, Kennedy KA. 2008. Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: Psychological distance and decision making. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34(2):224-236
153. Pronin E, Ross L. 2006. Temporal differences in trait self-ascription: When the self is seen as an other. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 90(2):197-209
154. Reeves B, Nass C. 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
155. Rogers L. 1998. Minds of Their Own: Thinking and Awareness in Animals. New York:Westview
156. Sanders C. 1993. Understanding dogs: Caretakers attributions of mindedness in canine-human relationships. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 22(2):205-226
157. Sanders C. 2003. Actions speak louder than words: Close relationships between human and nonhuman animals. Symb. Interact. 26(3):405-426
158. Sanders C. 2006. The dog you deserve: Ambivalence in the K-9 officer/patrol dog relationship. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 35(2):148-172
159. Sanna LJ, Chang EC, eds. 2006. Judgments over Time: The Interplay of Thoughts, Feelings, and Behaviors. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
160. Schelling TC. 1984. Choice and Consequence: Perspectives of an Errant Economist. Cambridge, MA:Harvard Univ. Press
161. Schroeder R. 2002. The Social Life of Avatars: New York: Springer
162. Schutz A. 1951. Making music together: A study in social relationship. Soc. Res. 18:76-97
163. Schutz A. 1967 [1932]. The structure of the social world: The realm of directly experienced social reality, the realm of contemporaries, and the realm of predecessors. In The Phenomenology of the Social World, trans. GWalsh, F Lehnert, pp. 139-214. Evanston, IL: Northwest. Univ. Press
164. Sigle-Rushton W, McLanahan S. 2004. Father absence and child well-being: A critical review. In The Future of the Family, ed. DP Moynihan, M Timothy, L Rainwater, pp. 116-155 New York: Russell Sage Found.
165. Simmel G. 1949. The sociology of sociability. Transl. EC Hughes. Am. J. Sociol. 55(3):254-261
166. Singleton V. 1998. Stabilizing instabilities: The role of the laboratory in the United Kingdom cervical screening programme. In Differences in Medicine: Unravelling Practices, Techniques and Bodies, ed. A Mol, M Berg, pp. 86-104. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
167. Smith RW, Bugni V. 2006. Symbolic interaction theory and architecture. Symb. Interact. 29(2):123-155
168. Star SL. 1991. Power, technologies, and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination, ed. J Law, pp. 26-56. London: Routledge
169. Stark R. 1999. Micro foundations of religion: A revised theory. Sociol. Theory 17(3):264-289
170. Strathman A, Joireman J, eds. 2005. Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time: Theory, Research, and Application. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
171. Sturman S. 2006.Onblack-boxing gender: Some social questions for Bruno Latour. Soc. Epistemol. 20(2):181-184
172. Sussman D. 2007. Do all dogs go to heaven? Poll: Americans divide like cats and dogs. http://abcnews. go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/pets beliefnetpoll010720.html
173. Tennant C. 1988. Parental loss in childhood. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 45(11):1045-1059
174. Tenner E. 2003. Our Own Devices: How Technology Remakes Humanity. New York: Vintage Books
175. Trope Y, Liberman N. 2003. Temporal construal. Psychol. Rev. 110(3):403-421
176. Turkle S. 2007. Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interact. Stud. 8(3):501-517
177. Turkle S, Breazeal C, Dast́e O, Scassellati B. 2005. First encounters with Kismet and Cog: Children's relationship with humanoid robots. In Digital Media: Transformations in Human Communication, ed. P Messaris, L Humphreys, pp. 313-330 New York: Peter Lang
178. Turkle S, Taggart W, Kidd CD, Dast́e O. 2006. Relational artifacts with children and elders: The complexities of cybercompanionship. Connect. Sci. 18(4):347-361
179. Turner F. 2005. Actor-networking the news. Soc. Epistemol. 19(4):321-324
180. Tzeng JY. 2004. Toward a more civilized design: Studying the effects of computers that apologize. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 61(3):319-345
181. Valverde M. 2005. Authorizing the production of urban moral order. Law Soc. Rev. 39(2):419-455
182. Vannini P. 2008. A queen's drowning: Material culture, drama, and the performance of a technological accident. Symb. Interact. 31(2):155-182
183. Webb S. 2001. Narrative, power and identity in virtual world environments. Inf. Commun. Soc. 4(4):560-594
184. Weber M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press
185. Weigert AJ. 2008. Pragmatic thinking about self, society, and natural environment: Mead, Carson, and beyond. Symb. Interact. 31(3):235-258
186. Weinberg D. 1997. The social construction of non-human agency: The case of mental disorder. Soc. Probl. 44(2):217-234
187. Wilkie R. 2005. Sentient commodities and productive paradoxes: The ambiguous nature of human-livestock relations in northeast Scotland. J. Rural Stud. 21(2):213-230
188. William-Jones B, Graham JE. 2003. Actor-network theory: A tool to support ethical analysis of commercial genetic testing. New Genet. Soc. 22(3):271-296
189. Wuthnow R. 1998. After Heaven: Spirituality in America Since the 1950s. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
190. Wuthnow R. 2007. Cognition and religion. Sociol. Relig. 68:341-360
191. Wuthnow R. 2008. Teach us to pray: The cognitive power of domain violations. Poetics 36:5-6
192. Yee N. 2006. The demographics, motivations and derived experiences of users of massively-multiuser online graphical environments. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 15:309-329
193. Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. 1999. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual difference metric. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 77(6):1271-1288
194. Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. 2008. The Time Paradox: The New Psychology of Time ThatWill Change Your Life. New York: Free Press
195. Zimbardo PG, Keough KA, Boyd JN. 1997. Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personal. Individ. Differ. 23:1007-1023
196. Zottarelli L. 2010. Broken bond: An exploration of human factors associated with companion animal loss during Hurricane Katrina. Sociol. Forum 25:1. In press