Does correction for guessing reduce students' performance on multiple-choice examinations? yes? no? sometimes?

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-15

  Betts, Lucy R ^a   Elder, Tracey J ^a   Hartley, James ^a   Trueman, M ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Closed book examinations; Correction for guessing; Gender differences; Multiple choice examinations; Negative marking; Open book examinations; Psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450230001     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930701773091     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, J. 2002. Gender-related differences on open and closed assessment tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 33: 495-503.
2. Ben-Shakhar, G., and Y. Sinai. 1991. Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: the role of differential guessing tendencies. Journal of Educational Measurement 28: 23-35.
3. Bridgeman, B., and C. Lewis. 1994. The relationship of essay and multiple-choice scores with grades in college courses. Journal of Educational Measurement 31: 37-50.
4. Budescu, D., and M. Bar-Hillel. 1993. To guess or not to guess: a decision-theoretic view of formula scoring. Journal of Educational Measurement 30: 227-291.
5. Burton, R.F. 2001. Quantifying the effects of chance in multiple choice and true/false tests: question selection and guessing of answers. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26: 41-50.
6. Burton, R.F 2002. Misinformation, partial knowledge and guessing in true/false tests. Medical Education 36: 805-811.
7. Burton, R.F. 2004. Multiple choice and true/false tests: r eliability measures and some implications of negative marking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29: 587-595.
8. Burton, R.F. 2005. Multiple-choice and true/false tests: myths and misapprehensions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30: 65-72.
9. Burton, R.F., and D.J. Miller. 1999. Statistical modelling of multiple-choice and true/false tests: ways of considering, and of reducing, the uncertainties attributable to guessing. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24: 399-411.
10. Bush, M. 2001. A multiple choice test that rewards partial knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education 25: 157-163.
11. Collins, S.C., and P.E. Kneale.2004. Study skills for psychology students: a practical guide.London: Arnold.
12. Diamond, J., and W. Evans. 1973. The correction for guessing. Review of Educational Research 43: 181-191.
13. Downs, C.T. 2006. What should make up a final mark for a course? An investigation into the academic performance of first year bioscience students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 31: 345-364.
14. Frary, R.B. 1988. NCME instructional module on formula scoring of multiple-choice tests (correction for guessing). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 7: 33-38.
15. Freeman, R.P.J., and T. Stone. 2006. Study skills for psychology: succeeding in your degree. London: Sage Publications.
16. Greene, B. 1997. Verbal abilities, gender, and the introductory economics course: a new look at an old assumption. Journal of Economic Education 28: 13-30.
17. Hammond, E.J., A.K. McIndoe, A.J. Sansome, and P.M. Spargo. 1998. Multiple-choice examinations: adopting an evidence-based approach to exam technique. Anaesthesia 53: 1105-1108.
18. Hartley, J., L. Betts, and W. Murray. 2007. Gender and assessment: differences, similarities and implications. Psychology Teaching Review 13: 34-47.
19. Ioannidou, M.K. 1997. Testing and life-long learning: open-book and closed-book examination in a university course. Studies in Educational Evaluation 23: 131-139.
20. Nicol, D. 2007. E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education 31: 53-64.
21. Paxton, M. 2000. A linguistic perspective on multiple choice questioning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25: 109-119.
22. Scouller, K. 1998. The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education 35: 453-472.
23. Shine, S., C. Kiravu, and J. Astley. 2004. In defence of open-book engineering degree examinations. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 32: 197-211.
24. Simkin, M.G., and W.L. Kuechler. 2005. Multiple-choice tests and student understanding: what is the connection. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 3: 73-97.
25. Tabachnick, B.G., and L.S Fidell. 2001. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
26. Theophilides, C., and O. Dionysiou. 1996. The major functions of the open-book examination at the university level: a factor analytic study. Studies in Educational Evaluation 22: 157-170.
27. Theophilides, C., and M. Koutselini. 2000. Study behavior in the closed-book and the open-book examination: a comparative analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation 6: 379-393.
28. Von Schrader, S., and T. Ansley. 2006. Sex differences in the tendency to omit items on multiplechoice tests: 1980-2000. Applied Measurement in Education 19: 41-65.
29. Walker, D.M., and J.S. Thompson. 2001. A note on multiple choice exams, with respect to students' risk preference and confidence. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26: 261-267.
30. Williams, R.L., and L. Clark. 2004. College students' ratings of student effort, student ability and teacher input as correlates of student performance on multiple-choice exams. Educational Research 46: 229-239.