A story shear-based adaptive pushover procedure for estimating seismic demands of buildings

Engineering Structures

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 174-183

  Shakeri, Kazem ^a   Shayanfar, Mohsen A ^b   Kabeyasawa, Toshimi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MOHAGHEGH ARDABILI   (Iran)

^b IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adaptive pushover; Higher modes; Seismic demands; Sign reversal; Story shear based

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE ESTIMATION; ADAPTIVE METHODS; APPLIED LOADS; COMBINATION RULES; DRIFT RESPONSE; ENERGY CONCEPT; FRAME BUILDINGS; FUNDAMENTAL MODES; HIGHER MODE; INELASTIC RESPONSE; LOAD PROFILES; MULTI DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS; PUSHOVER METHOD; SEISMIC DEMANDS; SIGN REVERSAL; SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS; STORY COMPONENTS; STORY SHEAR; VIBRATION CHARACTERISTICS;

SEISMOLOGY;

METHOD OF MOMENTS;

BUILDING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; ESTIMATION METHOD; LOADING; NUMERICAL METHOD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; VIBRATION;

EID: 70449622752     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ATC. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Report ATC-40. Redwood City (CA): Applied Technology Council; 1996
2. FEMA. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 356. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2000
3. CEN. Eurocode-8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1, Pr-EN 1998-1, Final Draft. Brussels (BEL): European Committee for Standardization; 2003
4. Otani S, Hiraishi H, Midorikawa M, Teshigawara M. New seismic design provisions in Japan. In: Proceeding of Uzumeri symposium, ACI Annual Convention. 2000
5. Saiidi M., and Sozen M.A. Simple non-linear seismic analysis of RC structures. ASCE J Struct Div 107 ST5 (1981) 937-951
6. Fajfar P., and Gašperšič P. The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Earthquake Eng & Struct Dyn 25 1 (1996) 31-46
7. Gupta A., and Krawinkler H. Estimation of seismic drift demands for frame structures. Earthquake Eng & Struct Dyn 29 9 (2000) 1287-1305
8. Krawinkler H., and Seneviratna G.D.P.K. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 20 4-6 (1998) 452-464
9. Kim S., and D'Amore E. Push-over analysis procedures in earthquake engineering. Earthq Spectra 15 3 (1999) 417-434
10. Mwafy A.M., and Elnashai A.S. Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Eng Struct 23 (2001) 407-424
11. FEMA. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, FEMA 440. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2005
12. Paret TF, Sasaki KK, Elibeck DH, Freeman SA. Approximate inelastic procedures to identify failure mechanism from higher mode effects. In: Proceedings of the eleventh world conference on earthquake engineering. 1996
13. Sasaki KK, Freeman SA, Paret TF. Multi-mode pushover procedure (MMP)-A method to identify the effects of higher modes in a pushover analysis. In: Proceedings of the sixth US national conference on earthquake engineering. 1998
14. Moghadam AS. A pushover procedure for tall buildings. In: Proceedings of the twelfth European conference on earthquake engineering. 2002
15. Chopra A.K., and Goel R.K. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Eng & Struct Dyn 31 (2002) 561-582
16. Shakeri K, Shayanfar MA, Moghadam AS. An efficient method for optimum combination of modes required for pushover analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering. 2007
17. Hernandez-Montes E., Kwon O.-S., and Aschheim M.A. An energy-based formulation for first-and multiple-mode nonlinear static (pushover) analyses. J Earthquake Eng 8 (2004) 69-88
18. Chopra A.K., Goel R.K., and Chinatanapakdee C. Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands. Earthq Spectra 20 3 (2004) 757-778
19. Gupta B., and Kunnath S.K. Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthq Spectra 16 2 (2000) 367-391
20. Aydinoǧlu M.N. An incremental response spectrum analysis procedure based on inelastic spectral displacements for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation. Bull Earthquake Eng 1 (2003) 3-36
21. Kalkan E., and Kunnath S.K. Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 132 11 (2006) 1721-1731
22. Matsumori T, Otani S, Shiohara H, Kabeyasawa T. Earthquake member deformation demands in reinforced concrete frame structures. In: Proceedings of the US-Japan workshop on performance-based earthquake engineering methodology for RC building structure. 1999
23. Jan T.S., Liu M.W., and Kao Y.C. An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings. Eng Struct 26 (2004) 117-128
24. Kunnath S.K. Identification of modal combination for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. Computer-aided Civil Eng 19 (2004) 246-259
25. Requena M, Ayala G. Evaluation of a simplified method for the determination of the non-linear seismic response of RC frames. In: Proceedings of the twelfth world conference on earthquake engineering. 2000
26. Elnashai A.S. Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Struct Eng Mech 12 1 (2001) 51-69
27. Antoniou S., and Pinho R. Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non-adaptive force-based pushover procedures. J Earthquake Eng 8 4 (2004) 497-522
28. Antoniou S., and Pinho R. Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthquake Eng 8 5 (2004) 643-661
29. Reinhorn AM. Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes. 1997
30. Bracci J.M., Kunnath S.K., and Reinhorn A.M. Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 123 1 (1997) 3-10
31. Satyarno I, Carr AJ, Restrepo J. Refined pushover analysis for the assessment of older reinforced concrete buildings. In: Proceedings of NZSEE technology conference. 1998
32. Papanikolaou V.K., Elnashai A.S., and Pareja J.F. Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis II: Comparative results. J Earthquake Eng 10 1 (2006) 127-151
33. Pinho R, Antoniou S, Pietra D. A displacement-based adaptive pushover for seismic assessment of steel and reinforced concrete buildings. In: Proceedings of the 8th US national conference on earthquake engineering. 2006
34. Ferracuti B., Pinho R., Savoia M., and Francia R. Verification of displacement-based adaptive pushover through multi-ground motion incremental dynamic analyses. Eng Struct 31 (2009) 1789-1799
35. Casarotti C., and Pinho R. An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action. Bull Earthquake Eng 5 3 (2007) 377-390
36. Pinho R, Bento R, Bhatt C. Adaptive capacity spectrum method for seismic assessment of 3D buildings. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering. 2008
37. Prakash V, Powell GH, Campbell S. DRAIN-2DX base program description and user guide, Version 1.10, Report No. UCB/SEMM- 93/17. Berkeley (CA): Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley; 1993
38. FEMA. State of the art report on systems performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking, FEMA 355C. Sacramento (CA): SAC Joint Venture; 2000
39. Goel R.K., and Chopra A.K. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings. Earthquake Spectra 20 1 (2004) 225-254
40. Gupta A, Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures (SAC Task 5.4.3). Report no. 132. Palo Alto (CA): John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University; 1999
41. Lopez-Menjivar M.A., and Pinho R. A review of existing pushover methods for 2-D reinforced concrete buildings (2004), Rose School, Pavia (Italy)