Push-over analysis procedure in earthquake engineering

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 417-434

  Kim, Simon ^a   D'Amore, Enzo ^b  

^a Biggs Cardosa Associates Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDITERRANEA OF REGGIO CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; TREND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0000292320     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1586051     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Applied Technology Council, August 1996, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Vol. 1, ATC40, Redwood City, CA.
2. Bertero, V. V., Anderson, J. C., Krawinkler, H., and Miranda, E., 1991, Design guidelines for ductility and drift limits, UCB/EERC-91/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
3. D'Amore, E. and Astaneh-Asl, A., 1995, Seismic behavior of six story instrumented building during 1987 and 1994 Northridge earthquakes, Report No. UCB/CE-Steel 95/03, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
4. De La Llera, J. C. and Chopra, A. K., 1994, Accidental and natural torsion in earthquake response and design of buildings, Report No. UCB/CE-Steel 94/07, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
5. Engelhart, M. D. and Husain, A. S., 1993, Cyclic loading performance of welded flange-bolted web connections, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 119 (12), 3537-3550, December.
6. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997, NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA-273, Washington, D.C., October.
7. International Conference of Building Officials, 1994, Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition, Whittier CA.
8. Kim, S., 1995, Passive control techniques in earthquake engineering, Proceedings of Smart Structures and Material 1995, 1-2 March 1995, San Diego, California, 214 SPIE 2445, 214-224.
9. Mahin, S. A. and Lin, J., 1983, Construction of inelastic response spectra for single-degree-of-freedom systems: computer program and applications, Report No. UCB/EERC-83/17, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
10. Park, Y. J., Ang, A. H-S, and Wen, Y. K., 1984, Seismic damage analysis and damage-limiting design of r.c. buildings, Report No., UILU-ENG-84-2007, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, October.
11. Prakash, V. and Powell, G. P., 1992, DRAIN-2-DX Version 1.02 User Guide, NISEE/Computer Applications, Berkeley, CA, July.
12. SAC Joint Venture, 1995, Interim guidelines: evaluation, repair, modification and design of steel moment frames, Report No. SAC-95-02, Sacramento, CA.
13. Shen, J-H and Astaneh-Asl, A., 1990, Seismic response evaluation of an instrumented six-story steel building, Report No., UCB/EERC-90/20, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
14. Structural Engineers Association of California, 1995, Vision 2000, performance based seismic engineering of buildings, Sacramento, CA.
15. Uang, C. M. and Bertero, V. V., 1988, Use of energy as a design criterion in earthquake-resistant design, UCB/EERC-88/18, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
16. Wilson, E. L., 1995, Static and Dynamic Structural Analysis Program, El Cerrito, CA.