Verification of displacement-based adaptive pushover through multi-ground motion incremental dynamic analyses

Engineering Structures

Volumn 31, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1789-1799

  Ferracuti, Barbara ^a   Pinho, Rui ^b   Savoia, Marco ^a   Francia, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Displacement based adaptive pushover, DAP; Incremental dynamic analysis, IDA; RC structures

Indexed keywords

CAPACITY CURVES; DISPLACEMENT-BASED ADAPTIVE PUSHOVER, DAP; GROUND MOTIONS; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS, IDA; LOAD DISTRIBUTIONS; RC FRAME STRUCTURES; RC STRUCTURES; SIMULATED RESPONSE; UNIFORM LOADS;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FAILURE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL MEMBERS;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS;

CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 67349272758     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.035     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Comité Europeen de Normalization. Eurocode 8-Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. EN 1998-3. CEN. Brussels (Belgium); 2005
2. Applied technology council. ATC-40, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. ATC. Redwood City (USA); 1996
3. Federal emergency management agency. FEMA-356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA. Washington (USA); 2000
4. Reinhorn A.M. Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations. In: Krawinkler H., and Fajfar P. (Eds). Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes (1997), Balkema 277-287
5. Bracci J.M., Kunnath S.K., and Reinhorn A.M. Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. ASCE J Struct Eng 123 1 (1997) 3-10
6. Gupta B., and Kunnath S.K. Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthq Spectra 16 2 (2000) 367-391
7. Antoniou S., and Pinho R. Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 8 5 (2004) 643-661
8. Elnashai A.S. Do we really need inelastic dynamic analysis?. J Earthq Eng 6 1 (2002) 123-130
9. Kalkan E., and Kunnath S.K. Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings. Eng Struct 29 3 (2007) 305-316
10. Pinho R, Marques M, Monteiro R, Casarotti C. Using the adaptive capacity spectrum method for seismic assessment of irregular frames. In: Proceedings of the 5th European workshop on the seismic behaviour of irregular and complex structures. 2008. Paper no. 21
11. Pacific earthquake engineering research center. OpenSees-Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. PEER Center. Berkeley (USA): University of California; 2005
12. Paret TF, Sasaki KK, Elibeck DK, Freeman SA. Approximate inelastic procedures to identify failure mechanism from higher mode effects. IN: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on earthquake engineering. 1996. Paper no. 966
13. Chopra A.K., and Goel R.K. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31 (2002) 561-582
14. Hernandez-Montes E., Kwon O.S., and Aschheim M.A. An energy-based formulation for first- and multiple-mode nonlinear static (pushover) analyses. J Earthq Eng 8 1 (2004) 69-88
15. Chopra A.K., Goel R.K., and Chintanapakdee C. Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands. Earthq Spectra 20 (2004) 757-778
16. Kalkan E., and Kunnath S.K. Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 132 11 (2006) 1721-1731
17. Requena M, Ayala G. Evaluation of a simplified method for the determination of the nonlinear seismic response of RC frames. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering. 2000
18. Elnashai A.S. Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Struct Eng Mech 12 1 (2001) 51-69
19. Antoniou S, Rovithakis A, Pinho R. Development and verification of a fully adaptive pushover procedure. In: Proceedings of the 12th European conference on earthquake engineering. 2002. Paper no. 822
20. Matsumori T, Otani S, Shiohara H, Kabeyasawa T. Earthquake member deformation demands in reinforced concrete frame structures. In: Proceedings of the US-Japan workshop on performance-based earthquake engineering methodology for R/C building structures. 1999. p. 79-94
21. Kunnath S.K. Identification of modal combinations for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 19 4 (2004) 246-259
22. López-Menjivar MA. Verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover method for assessment of 2-D reinforced concrete buildings. Ph.D. thesis. Pavia (Italy): European School for Advances Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (ROSE School)
23. Shakeri K, Shayanfar MA, Moghadam AS. An efficient method for optimum combination of modes required for pushover analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering. 2007
24. Antoniou S., and Pinho R. Advantages and limitations of force-based adaptive and non-adaptive pushover procedures. J Earthq Eng 8 4 (2004) 497-522
25. Pinho R, Antoniou S. A displacement-based adaptive pushover algorithm for assessment of vertically irregular frames. In: Proceedings of 4th European workshop on seismic behaviour of irregular and complex structures. 2005
26. Vamvatsikos D., and Cornell C.A. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31 3 (2002) 491-514
27. Gasparini D, Vanmarcke EH. SIMQKE, Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra. Technical report. MIT; 1976
28. Mander J.B., Priestley M.J.N., and Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng ASCE 114 8 (1988) 1804-1826