Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 757-778

  Chopra, Anil K ^a   Goel, Rakesh K ^b   Chintanapakdee, Chatpan ^c  

^a 109 McLaughlin Hall   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKES; ELASTICITY; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; MODAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

GROUND MOTION; MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; MODIFIED MODAL PUSH OVER ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DEMANDS;

SEISMOLOGY;

BUILDING; ELASTICITY; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; VIBRATION;

EID: 5744243993     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1775237     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2001. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, prepared for the SAC Joint Venture, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356, Washington, D.C.
2. Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A., 1970. Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, 684 pp.
3. Bracci, J. M., Kunnath, S. K., and Reinhorn, A. M., 1997. Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation for reinforced concrete structures, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 123 (1), 3-10.
4. Chintanapakdee, C., and Chopra, A. K., 2002. Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using vertically "regular" and irregular generic frames, Report No. UCB/EERC 2003-03, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
5. Chopra, A. K., 2001. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 844 pp.
6. Chopra, A. K., and Goel, R. K., 2002. Modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3), 561-582.
7. Chopra, A. K., and Chintanapakdee, C., 2004a. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: Vertically "regular" and irregular generic frames, Earthquake Spectra 20 (1), 255-271.
8. Chopra, A. K., and Chintanapakdee, C., 2004b. Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: SDF bilinear systems, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 130 (9), 1-11.
9. Eberhard, M., and Sozen, M. A., 1993. Behavior-based method to determine design shear in earthquake-resistant walls, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 119 (2), 619-640.
10. Goel, R. K., and Chopra, A. K., 1997. Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 123 (11), 1454-1461.
11. Goel, R. K., and Chopra, A. K., 2004. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analysis: SAC buildings, Earthquake Spectra 20 (1 ), 225-254.
12. Gupta, A., and Krawinkler, H., 1999. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures (SAC Task 5.4.3), Report No. 132, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
13. Gupta, B., and Kunnath, S. K., 2000. Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures, Earthquake Spectra 16 (2), 367-392.
14. International Code Council (ICC), 2000. 2000 International Building Code, Falls Church, VA.
15. Kunnath, S. K., and Gupta, B., 2000, Validity of deformation demand estimates using nonlinear static procedures, Proceedings of U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, pp. 117-128.
16. Matsumori, T., Otani, S., Shiohara, H., and Kabeyasawa, T., 2000, Earthquake member deformation demands on reinforced concrete frame structures, Proceedings of U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Maui, HI, pp. 79-94.
17. Medina, R. A., and Krawinkler, H., 2003. Seismic demands for non-deteriorating structures and their dependence on ground motions, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 144, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
18. th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper No. 966.
19. Rodriguez, M. E., Restrepo, J. I., and Carr, A. J., 2002, Earthquake-induced floor horizontal accelerations in buildings, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3), 693-718.
20. th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, WA.
21. Somerville, P., Smith, N., Punyamurthula, S., and Sun, J., 1997. Development of ground motion time histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project, SAC Background Document Report No. SAC/BD-9/04, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.
22. nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Japan, 2, pp. 895-912.