Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation

Engineering Structures

Volumn 20, Issue 4-6, 1998, Pages 452-464

  Krawinkler, Helmut ^a   Seneviratna, G D P K ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b Krawinkler Luth and Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Inelastic behavior; Performance evaluation; Pushover analysis

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ELASTICITY; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; STRUCTURAL MEMBERS;

INELASTIC BEHAVIOR; PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION;

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE;

EID: 0032040715     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. FEMA, 'NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings - pre-ballot draft', FEMA 273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1996
2. Lawson, R. S., Vance, V. and Krawinkler, H. 'Nonlinear static pushover analysis - why, when and how?', Proc. 5th US Conf. Earthq. Engng, Vol. 1, Chicago, IL, 1994, pp 283-292
3. Miranda, E. 'Seismic evaluation and upgrading of existing buildings', Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1991
4. Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. 'N2 - a method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular structures', Proc. 9th World Conf. Earthq. Engng, Vol. 5, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 1988, pp 111-116
5. Saiidi, M. and Sozen, M. A. 'Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures', J. Struct. Div., ASCE 1981, 107 (ST5), 937-951
6. Fajfar, P. and Krawinkler, H. Nonlinear seismic analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings, Elsevier, London, 1992
7. Krawinkler, H. and Rahnama, M. 'Effects of soft soils on design spectra', Proc. 10th World Conf. Earthq. Engng, Vol. 10, Madrid, Spain, 1992, pp 5841-5846
8. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V. V. 'Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design', Earthq. Spectra. EERI, 1994, 10 (2), 357-379
9. Nassar, A. A. and Krawinkler, H. 'Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems', John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report no. 95, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, 1991
10. Nassar, A. A., Krawinkler, H. and Osteraas, J. D. 'Seismic design based on strength and ductility demands', Proc. 10th World Conf. Earthq. Engng, Vol. 10, Madrid, Spain, 1992, pp 5861-5866
11. Newmark, N. M. and Hall, W. J. 'Earthquake spectra and design', EERI Monograph Series, 1982
12. Rahnama, M. and Krawinkler, H. 'Effects of soft soils and hysteresis models on seismic design spectra', John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report no. 107, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, 1993
13. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. 'Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement', Earthq. Engng Struct. Dynam. 1994, 23
14. Seneviratna, G. D. P. K. 'Evaluation of inelastic MDOF effects for seismic design', Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, 1995
15. Bracci, J. M., Kunnath, S. K. and Reinhorn, A. M. 'Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation for reinforced concrete structures', J. Struct. Engng, ASCE 1997, 123 (1), 3-10
16. Seneviratna, G. D. P. K. and Krawinkler, H. 'Strength and displacement demands for seismic design of structural walls', Proc. 5th US Nat. Conf. Earthq. Engng, Vol. II, Chicago, IL, pp 181-190