An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 377-390

  Casarotti, Chiara ^a   Pinho, Rui ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^b EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR TRAINING AND RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING EUCENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

ACSM; Adaptive; Bridges; Capacity spectrum method; Displacement based pushover; Seismic assessment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

ADAPTIVE PUSHOVER TECHNIQUE; CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD; DISPLACEMENT BASED PUSHOVER; EARTHQUAKE MOTION; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT;

BRIDGES;

BRIDGE; DISPLACEMENT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RIGIDITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC HAZARD; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 34547217008     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-007-9031-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthquake Eng 8(5):643-661
2. Applied Technology Council (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, ATC-40 Report, Vol 1 and 2, ATC, California, USA
3. Bommer JJ, Martinez-Pereira A (1999) The effective duration of earthquake ground motion. J Earthquake Eng 3(2): 127-172
4. Casarotti C, Pinho R, Calvi GM (2005) Adaptive pushover based methods for seismic assessment and design of bridge structures. ROSE Research Report No. 2005/06, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy
5. Chopra AK, Goel RK (1999) Capacity-Demand-Diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum. Earthquake Spectra 15(4):637-656
6. Chopra AK, Goel RK (2000) Evaluation of NSP to estimate seismic deformation: SDF systems. ASCE J Struct Eng April 2000, 482-490
7. Chopra AK, Goel RK (2002) A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 31:561-582
8. Elnashai AS (2001) Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Struct Eng Mech 12(l):51-69
9. Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 28:979-993
10. Fajfar P, Gaspersic P, Drobnic D (1997) A simplified nonlinear method for seismic damage analysis of structures. Proceedings of the workshop on seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, Rotterdam, pp 183-193
11. Fischinger M, Beg D, Isakovié TA, Tomaževič M, Žarnić R (2004) Performance based assessment -from general methodologies to specific implementations. International workshop on performancebased seismic design, bled, June 28/July 1
12. Freeman SA (1998) Development and use of capacity spectrum method. Proceedings of the 6th US national conference on earthquake engineering, Seattle, CD-ROM, EERI, Oakland
13. Freeman SA, Nicoletti JP, Tyrell JV (1975) Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk -a case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington. Proceedings of the 1st US national conference on earthquake engineering, Oakland, California, pp 113-122
14. Goel RK, Chopra AK (1997) Evaluation of bridge abutment capacity. Earthquake Spectra 13(1):225254
15. Chopra AK, Goel RK (1999) Capacity-Demand-Diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum. Earthquake Spectra 15(4):637-656
16. Isakovic T, Fischinger M (2006) Higher modes in simpli ed inelastic seismic analysis of single column bent viaducts. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 35:95-114
17. Kowalsky MJ (2000) Deformation limit states for circular reinforced concrete bridge columns. J Struct Eng 126(8):869-878
18. Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114(8): 1804-1826
19. Menegotto M, Pinto PE (1973) Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending. Symposium on the resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well defined repeated loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 15-22
20. Newmark NM, Hall WJ (1982) Earthquake spectra and design. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley
21. Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GM (1996) Seismic design and retrofit of bridge structures. Wiley, New York
22. Priestley MJN, Calvi GM (2003) Direct displacement-based seismic design of concrete bridges. Proceeding of the fifth ACT international conference of seismic bridge design and retrofit for earthquake resistance, December 8-9,2003, La Jolla, California
23. Reinhorn A (1997) Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations. In: Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes: proceedings of the international workshop, Bled, Slovenia, pp 277-287
24. SAC Joint Venture (1997) Develop suites of time histories, Project Task: 5.4.1, Draft Report, March 21,1997, Sacramento, CA, USA
25. Seismosoft (2005) Seismostruct -a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures (online), available from URL: http//www.seismosoft.com (March 30,2005)
26. Takeda T, Sozen M, Nielsen N (1970) Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. ASCE J Struct Div 96(12):2557-2573