Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non-adaptive force-based pushover procedures

Journal of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 497-522

  Antoniou, S ^a   Pinho, R ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Europ Sch Adv Studs RSR   (Italy)

Author keywords

FAP; Force based adaptive pushover; Incremental dynamic analysis

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; DEFORMATION; ELASTICITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STIFFNESS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; FORCE BASED ADAPTIVE PUSHOVERS; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; PROGRESSIVE STIFFNESS;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 8644226290     PISSN: 13632469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S1363246904001511     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Albanesi, T., Biondi, S. and Petrangeli, M. [2002] "Pushover analysis: An energy based approach," Proc. of the Twelfth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, United Kingdom, Paper No. 605.
2. Antoniou, S. [2001] "Pushover analysis for seismic assessment of RC structures," Transfer Report, Department of Civil Engineering, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
3. Antoniou, S. [2002] "Advanced inelastic static analysis for seismic assessment of structures," PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, University of London, United Kingdom.
4. ATC [1997] "NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings," FEMA Report No. 273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Applied Technology Council, Washington, B.C.
5. Bommer, J. and Martinez-Pereira, A. [1999] "The effective duration of earthquake strong motion," Journal of Earthquake Engineering 3(2), 127-172.
6. Bracci, J. M., Kunnath, S. K. and Reinhorn, A. M. [1997] "Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures," Journal of Structural Engineering 123(1), 3-10.
7. Campos-Costa, A. and Pinto, A. V. [1999] "European seismic hazard scenarios - An approach to the definition of input motion for testing and reliability assessment of Civil Engineering structures," JRC Special Publication No. X.99.XX, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
8. CEN [1995] European Prestandard ENV 1998-1-1: Eurocode 8 - Earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings. Comite Europeen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium.
9. Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K. [2002] "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31, 561-582.
10. Elnashai, A. S. [2001] "Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications," Structural Engineering and Mechanics 12(1), 51-69.
11. Fardis, M. N. [1994] "Analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings according to Eurocodes 2 and 8. Configurations 3,5 and 6," Reports on Prenormative Research in Support of Eurocode 8.
12. Freeman, S. A., Nicoletti, J. P. and Tyrell, J. V. [1975] "Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk - A case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington," Proc. of the First U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Oakland, California, pp. 113-122.
13. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S. K. [2000] "Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures," Earthquake Spectra 16(2), 367-391.
14. Hamburger, R. O., Foutch, D. A. and Cornell, C. A. [2000] "Performance basis of guidelines for evaluation, upgrade and design of moment-resisting steel frames," Proc. of the Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, Paper No. 2543.
15. Hughes, T. J. R. [1987] The Finite Element Method, Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Inc.).
16. Kim, S. and D'Amore, E. [1999] "Push-over analysis procedure in earthquake engineering," Earthquake Spectra 15(3), 417-434.
17. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G. D. P. K. [1998] "Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation," Engineering Structures 20(4-6), 452-464.
18. Lawson, R. S., Vance, V. and Krawinkler, H. [1994] "Nonlinear static push-over analysis - Why, when, and how?" Proc. of the Fifth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Inst., Oakland, California, 1, 283-292.
19. Lefort, T. [2000] "Advanced pushover analysis of RC multi-storey buildings," MSc Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
20. Moghadam, A. S. and Tso, W. K. [2002] "A pushover procedure for tall buildings," Proc. of the Twelfth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, United Kingdom, Paper No. 395.
21. Mwafy, A. M. and Elnashai, S. A. [2000] "Static pushover versus dynamic-to-collapse analysis of RC buildings," ESEE Research Report No. 00/1, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
22. Mwafy, A. M. [2001] "Seismic performance of code-designed RC buildings," PhD Thesis, Imperial College London, University of London, United Kingdom.
23. Naeim, F. and Lobo, R. [1999] "Avoiding common pitfalls in pushover analysis," Proc. of the Eighth Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 269-274.
24. Papanikolaou, V. [2000] "Development and verification of adaptive pushover analysis procedures," MSc Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
25. Paret, T. F., Sasaki, K. K., Eilbeck, D. H. and Freeman, S. A. [1996] "Approximate inelastic procedures to identify failure mechanisms from higher mode effects," Proc. of the Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Disc 2, Paper No. 966.
26. Priestley, M. J. N. [2003] Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering, Revisited (IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy).
27. Requena, M. and Ayala, G. [2000] "Evaluation of a simplified method for the determination of the nonlinear seismic response of RC frames," Proc. of the Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, Paper No. 2109.
28. Rovithakis, A. [2001] "Verification of adaptive pushover analysis procedures," MSc Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
29. Sasaki, K. K., Freeman, S. A. and Paret, T. F. [1998] "Multi-mode pushover procedure (MMP) - A method to identify the effects of higher modes in a pushover analysis," Proc. of the Sixth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Inst., Oakland, California, 12 pp.
30. SeismoSoft [2004] SeismoStruct - A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Non-linear Analysis of Framed Structures [online]. Available from URL: http://www. seismosoft.com.
31. Valles, R. E., Reinhorn, A. M., Kunnath, S. K., Li, C. and Madan, A. [1996] IDARC2D Version 4-0: A Computer Program for the Inelastic Analysis of Buildings, Technical Report NCEER 96-0010, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
32. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C. A. [2002] "Incremental dynamic analysis," Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31(3), 491-514.