Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform

Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 804-808

  Mayer, Jochen ^a   Suttner, Stefan ^a  

^a KLINIKUM LUDWIGSHAFEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arterial pressure waveform; Cardiac output; Pulse contour; Transpulmonary thermodilution

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; CALIBRATION; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; DEVICE; FLUID SHIFT; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRESSURE RECORDING ANALYTICAL METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY; PULSE CONTOUR CARDIAC OUTPUT; PULSE WAVE; REVIEW; THERMODILUTION; VALIDATION STUDY; VASCULAR ACCESS;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE;

EID: 70449475939     PISSN: 09527907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328332a473     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Peyton PJ, Venkatesan Y, Hood SG, et al. Noninvasive, automated and continuous cardiac output monitoring by pulmonary capnodynamics. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:72-80.
2. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:5-14.
3. Schuerholz T, Cobas Meyer M, Friedrich L, et al. Reliability of continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis on porcine septic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50:407-413.
4. Buhre W, Rossaint R. Perioperative management and monitoring in anaesthesia. Lancet 2003; 362:1839-1846.
5. O'Rourke NF, Yaginuma T. Wave reflections and the arterial pulse. Arch Intern Med 1984; 144:366-371.
6. Lurie KG, Barnes TA, Zielinski TM, et al. Evaluation of a prototypic inspiratory impedance threshold valve designed to enhance the efficiency of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Respir Care 2003; 48:52-57.
7. Mayer J, Boldt J, Schöllhorn T, et al. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing major cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:176-182.
8. Morgan P, Al-Subaie N, Rhodes A. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring. Curr Opin Crit Care 2008; 14:322-326.
9. Gondos T, Marjanek Z, Kisvarga Z, et al. Precision of transpulmonary thermodilution: how many measurements are necessary? Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26:508-512.
10. Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, et al. Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-h calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:434-440.
11. Halvorsen PS, Espinoza A, Lundblad R, et al. Agreement between PiCCO pulse-contour analysis, pulmonal artery thermodilution and transthoracic thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery by-pass surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50:1050-1057.
12. Bendjelid K. When to recalibrate the PiCCO? From a physiological point of view, the answer is simple. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53:689-690.
13. Rauch H, Muller M, Fleischer F, et al. Pulse contour analysis versus thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46:424-429.
14. Della Rocca RG, Costa MG, Pompei L, et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:350-356.
15. Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:2407-2412.
16. Rodig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, et al. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs. thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82:525-530.
17. Goedje O, Hoecke K, Goetz AE, et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:52-58.
18. Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15:85-91.
19. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies - with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009; 13:201.
20. Cecconi M, Grounds M, Rhodes A. Methodologies for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement: are we as good as we think we are? Curr Opin Crit Care 2007; 13:294-296.
21. Bajorat J, Hofmockel R, Vagts DA, et al. Comparison of invasive and lessinvasive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23:23-30.
22. Bein B, Meybohm P, Cavus E, et al. The reliability of pulse contour-derived cardiac output during hemorrhage and after vasopressor administration. Anesth Analg 2007; 105:107-113.
23. Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, et al. Pulmonary artery catheter versus pulse contour analysis: a prospective epidemiological study. Crit Care 2006; 10:R174.
24. Goepfert MS, Reuter DA, Akyol D, et al. Goal-directed fluid management reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:96-103.
25. Rhodes A, Sunderland R. Arterial pulse pressure analysis: the LiDCOplus system. Update in intensive care and emergency medicine. In: Pinsky MR, Payen D, editors. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Heidelberg: Springer; 2004. pp. 183-192.
26. Cecconi M, Dawson D, Grounds RM, et al. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique. Int Care Med 2009; 35:498-504.
27. Costa MG, Della Rocca G, Chiarandini P, et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement in hyperdynamic conditions: pulmonary artery catheter vs. lithium dilution technique. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:257-263.
28. Jonas MM, Tanser SJ. Lithium dilution measurement of cardiac output and arterial pulse waveform analysis: an indicator dilution calibrated beat-by-beat system for continuous estimation of cardiac output. Curr Opin Crit Care 2002; 8:257-261.
29. Linton RA, Band DM, Haire KM. A new method of measuring cardiac output in man using lithium dilution. Br J Anaesth 1993; 71:262-266.
30. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, et al. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 2005; 9:R687-R693.
31. Parviainen I, Jakob SM, Suistomaa M, et al. The Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI). Practical sources of error in measuring pulmonary artery occlusion pressure: a study in participants of a special intensivist training program of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50:600-603.
32. Manecke GR. Cardiac output from the arterial catheter: deceptively simple. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21:629-631.
33. Sander M, Spies CD, Grubitzsch H, et al. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Crit Care 2006; 10:R164.
34. Opdam HI, Wan L, Bellomo R. A pilot assessment of the FloTrac(TM) cardiac output monitoring system. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:344-349.
35. Lorsomradee S, Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, De Hert SG. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21:636-643.
36. Mayer J, Boldt J, Wolf MW, et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation device. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:867-872.
37. Prasser C, Trabold B, Schwab A, et al. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for arterial pressure-based cardiac output assessment without external calibration. Int Care Med 2007; 33:2223-2225. (Pubitemid 350164566)
38. Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, et al. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care 2008; 12:R82.
39. Mayer J, Boldt J, Beschmann R, et al. Uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis for less-invasive cardiac output determination in obese patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:185-190.
40. Biancofiore G, Critchley LAH, Lee A, et al. Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitor system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102:47-54.
41. Mayer J, Boldt J, Beschmann R, et al. Individualized intraoperative patient optimization using uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Crit Care 2009; 13 (Suppl 1):219.
42. Mayer J, Boldt J, Poland R, et al. Continuous arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output using the FloTrac/Vigileo: a review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 23:401-406.
43. Romagnoli S, Romano SM, Bevilacqua S, et al. Cardiac output by arterial pulse contour: reliability under hemodynamic derangements. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 8:642-646.
44. Bernstein DP. Pressure pulse contour-derived stroke volume and cardiac output in the morbidly obese patient. Obes Surg 2008; 18:1015-1021.
45. Calamandrei M, Mirabile L, Muschetta S, et al. Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008; 9:310-312.
46. Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26:515-520.
47. Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, et al. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:159-165.