Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 322-326

  Morgan, Patrick ^a   Al Subaie, Nawaf ^a   Rhodes, Andrew ^a  

^a ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; LiDCO; PiCCO; Pulse contour; Vigileo

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; CALIBRATION; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DEVICE; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MONITOR; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULSE PRESSURE; REVIEW; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; THERMODILUTION; VALIDITY;

CALIBRATION; CARDIAC OUTPUT; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC;

EID: 43449129170     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282fd6e4a     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, et al. Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 1988; 94:1176-1186.
2. Boyd O, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients. JAMA 1993; 270:2699-2707.
3. Wilson J, Woods I, Fawcett J, et al. Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. BMJ 1999; 318:1099-1103.
4. Lobo SM, Lobo FR, Polachini CA, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing fluids and dobutamine optimization of oxygen delivery in high-risk surgical patients ISRCTN42445141. Crit Care Med 2006; 10:R72.
5. Kern JW, Shoemaker WC. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:1686-1692.
6. Sinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1997; 315:909-912.
7. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:820-826.
8. Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, Horgan AF. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2006; 93:1069-1076.
9. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:575-590. This consensus conference is the first to address the evidence behind cardiac output monitoring in shock.
10. Cholley BP, Payen D. Noninvasive techniques for measurements of cardiac output. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11:424-429.
11. Pearse RM, Ikram K, Barry J. Equipment review: an appraisal of the LiDCO plus method of measuring cardiac output. Crit Care 2004; 8:190-195.
12. Jonas MM, Kelly FE, Linton RA, et al. A comparison of lithium dilution cardiac output measurements made using central and antecubital venous injection of lithium chloride. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15:525-528.
13. Linton R, Band D, O'Brien T, et al. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: a comparison with thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:1796-1800.
14. Linton RA, Young LE, Marlin DJ, et al. Cardiac output measured by lithium dilution, thermodilution, and transesophageal Doppler echocardiography in anesthetized horses. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61:731-737.
15. Linton RA, Jonas MM, Tibby SM, et al. Cardiac output measured by lithium dilution and transpulmonary thermodilution in patients in a paediatric intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26:1507-1511.
16. Costa MG, Della Rocca G, Chiarandini P, et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement in hyperdynamic conditions: pulmonary artery catheter vs. lithium dilution technique. Intensive Care Med 2007; 34:257-263.
17. Cooper ES, Muir WW. Continuous cardiac output monitoring via arterial pressure waveform analysis following severe hemorrhagic shock in dogs. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:1724-1729.
18. Cecconi M, Fawcett J, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. A prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of pulse power analysis to monitor cardiac output in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2008; 8:3.
19. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, et al. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial ISRCTN38797445. Crit Care 2005; 9:R687-R693.
20. PULSION Medical Systems AG, Munich, Germany. PiCCO.
21. Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, et al. Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:434-440.
22. Salukhe T, Wyncoll D. Volumetric haemodynamic monitoring and continuous pulse contour analysis - an untapped resource for coronary and high dependency care units? Br J Cardiol (Acute Interv Cardiol) 2002; 9:AIC20-AIC25.
23. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia C, et al. Cardiac output monitoring: aortic transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis agree with standard thermodilution methods in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50:707-711.
24. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L, et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:350-356.
25. Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Wegscheider K, Meier-Hellmann A. Comparison of cardiac output and circulatory blood volumes by transpulmonary thermo-dye dilution and transcutaneous indocyanine green measurement in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 121:559-565.
26. Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, et al. Pulmonary artery catheter versus pulse contour analysis: a prospective epidemiological study. Crit Care 2006; 10:R174. This paper showed no difference in outcome between PiCCO and PAFC guided therapy. However, the PiCCO patients received more intravenous fluids and required a longer duration of mechanical ventilation.
27. Goepfert MS, Reuter DA, Akyol D, et al. Goal-directed fluid management reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:96-103.
28. Edwards Lifesciences. Edwards Vigileo monitor. http://www.edwards.com/ products/mininvasive/vigileo.htm.
29. Edwards Lifesciences. Edwards Flotrac sensor. http://www.edwards.com/ products/mininvasive/flotracsensor.htm.
30. Sander M, Spies CD, Grubitzsch H, et al. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Crit Care 2006; 10:R164.
31. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15:85-91.
32. Al-Subaie N, Bennett D. Year in review 2006: Critical Care Cardiology. Crit Care 2007; 11:225.
33. Opdam HI, Wan L, Bellomo R. A pilot assessment of the FloTrac(TM) cardiac output monitoring system. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:344-349.
34. Mayer J, Boldt J, Schollhorn T, et al. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:176-182.
35. Lorsomradee S, Lorsomradee SR, Cromheecke S, De Hert SG. Continuous cardiac output measurement: arterial pressure analysis versus thermodilution technique during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Anaesthesia 2007; 62:979-983.
36. Lorsomradee S, Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, De Hert SG. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21:636-643.
37. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:337-342. This paper studied the use of noncalibrated cardiac output monitoring in septic patients.
38. McGee WT, Horswell JL, Calderon J, et al. Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: a multicenter, prospective clinical trial. Crit Care 2007; 11:R105. This study found that Vigileo derived cardiac output monitoring is comparable to PAFC continuous cardiac output monitoring.
39. Dhingra VK, Fenwick JC, Walley KR, et al. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick cardiac output in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 122:990-997.
40. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, et al. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/ Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:329-336. This study compared both calibrated and noncalibrated cardiac output monitoring with PAFC derived monitoring.
41. de Waal EE, Kalkman CJ, Rex S, Buhre WF. Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:1904-1909.
42. Breukers RM, Sepehrkhouy S, Spiegelenberg SR, Groeneveld AB. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21:632-635.