Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Validity of a second generation device

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 867-872

  Mayer, Jochen ^a   Boldt, Joachim ^a   Wolf, Michael W ^a   Lang, Johannes ^a   Suttner, Stefan ^a  

^a KLINIKUM LUDWIGSHAFEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM; PANCURONIUM; SUFENTANIL;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEART INDEX; HEART OUTPUT; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; THERMODILUTION; VALIDITY;

AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY SURFACE AREA; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PULMONARY ARTERY; RADIAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMODILUTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 39749138803     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318161964d     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chaney JC, Derdak S. Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the intensivist: current and emerging technology. Crit Care Med 2002;30:2338-45
2. Rodig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs. thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:525-30
3. Godje O, Hocke K, Goetz AE, Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Reichart B, Friedl R, Hannekum A, Pfeiffer UJ. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002;30:52-8
4. Pittman J, Bar-Yosef S, Sum Ping J, Sherwood M, Mark J. Continuous cardiac output monitoring with pulse contour analysis: a comparison with lithium indicator dilution cardiac output measurement. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2015-21
5. Yamashita K, Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, Abe H, Manabe M. Cardiac output by PulseCO is not interchangeable with thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB. Can J Anaesth 2005;52:530-4
6. de Vaal JB, Wilde RBP, van den Berg PC, Schreuder JJ, Jansen JR. Less invasive determination of cardiac output from arterial pressure by aortic diameter-calibrated pulse contour. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:326-31
7. Hirschl MM, Binder M, Gwechenberger M, Herkner H, Bur A, Kittler H, Laggner AN. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output in critically ill patients by analysis of the finger blood pressure waveform. Crit Care Med 1997;25:1909-14
8. Hirschl MM, Kittler H, Woisetschläger C, Siostrzonek P, Staudinger T, Kofler J, Oschatz E, Bur A, Gwechenberger M, Laggner AN. Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement. Crit Care Med 2000;28:1798-802
9. Sander M, Spies CD, Grubitzsch H, Foer A, Muller M, von Heymann C. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Crit Care 2006;10:R164
10. Manecke GR Jr, Auger WR. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007;21:3-7
11. Mayer J, Boldt J, Schollhorn T, Rohm KD, Mengistu AM, Suttner S. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007;98:176-82
12. Opdam HI, Wan L, Bellomo R. A pilot assessment of the FloTrac™ cardiac output monitoring system. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:344-9
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986;8476:307-10
14. Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999;15:85-91
15. Pearse RM, Ikram K, Barry J. Equipment review: an appraisal of the LiDCO™ plus method of measuring cardiac output. Crit Care 2004;8:190-5
16. Wesseling R, de Witt B, Ty Smith N. A simple device for the continuous measurement of cardiac output. Adv Cardiovas Phys 1983;5:16-52
17. O'Rourke NF, Yaginuma T. Wave reflections and the arterial pulse. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:366-71
18. Sujatha P, Mehta P, Dhar A, Sarkar D, Meharwal ZS, Trehanet N. Comparison of cardiac output in OPCAB: bolus thermodilution technique versus pulse contour analysis. Ann Card Anaesth 2006;9:44-8
19. Mohr R, Lavee J, Goor DA. Inaccuracy of radial artery pressure measurement after cardiac operations. J Thorac Vasc Surg 1987;94:286-90
20. Manecke GR Jr, Parimucha M, Stratmann G, Wilson WC, Roth DM, Auger WR, Kerr KM, Jamieson SW, Kapelanski DP, Mitchel MM. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and the femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth 2004;18:175-9
21. Stern DH, Gerson JI, Allen FB, Parker FB. Can we trust the direct radial artery pressure immediately following cardiopulmonary bypass? Anesthesiology 1985;62:557-61