Mediated public diplomacy: A strategic contest over international agenda building and frame building

Political Communication

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 447-467

  Tamir, Sheafer ^a   Itay, Gabay ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Agenda building; Frame building; Framing contest; Public diplomacy; Strategic framing

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449376983     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584600903297240     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Althaus, S. L. (2003). When news norms collide, follow the lead: New evidence for free press independence. Political Communication, 20, 381-414.
2. Arquilla, J.(1992). Louder than words: Tacit communication in international crises. Political Communication, 9, 155-172.
3. Baum, M. A., & Potter, P. B. K. (2008). The relationship between mass media, public opinion, and foreign policy: Toward a theoretical synthesis. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 39-65.
4. Benford, R. D., & Snow, A. D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessments. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
5. Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40, 103-125.
6. Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1986). Journalists' orientations to political institutions: The case of parliamentary broadcasting. In P. Golding, G. Murdock, & P. Schlesinger (Eds.), Communicating politics: Mass communications and the political process (pp. 67-92). Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.
7. Chang, T. K. (1998). All countries not created equal to be news: World system and international communication. Communication Research, 25, 528-549.
8. Chang, T. K., Shoemaker, P. J., & Brendlinger, N. (1987). Determinants of international news coverage in the U.S. media. Communication Research, 14, 396-414.
9. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57, 99-118.
10. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. (1971). The politics of agenda-building: An alternative perspective for modern democratic theory. Journal of Politics, 33, 892-915.
11. Cobb, R. W., Ross J. K., & Ross, M. H. (1976). Agenda building as a comparative political process. American Political Science Review, 70, 126-138.
12. Cook, T. E. (1998). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Davison, W. P. (1974). News media and international negotiation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38, 174-193.
14. Dearing, J., & Rogers, E. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Wackman, D. (1998). Moral referendums: Values, news media and the process of candidate choice. Political Communication, 15, 301-321.
16. Downs, G. W., & David Rocke, M. (1990). Tacit bargaining, arms races, and arms control. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17. Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Entman, R. M. (2008). Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. Press/Politics, 13, 87-102.
19. Ericson, R. V., Baranek, P. M., & Chan, J. B. L. (1989). Negotiating control: A study of news sources. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
20. Farrell, J., & Rabin, M. (1996). Cheap talk. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 103-118.
21. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Gamson, W. A. (1998). Social movements and cultural change. In G. M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), From contention to democracy (pp. 57-77). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
23. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. Research in Political Sociology, 3, 137-177.
24. Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon.
25. Geva, N., & Hanson, D. C. (1999). Cultural similarity, foreign policy actions, and regime perception: An experimental study of international cues and democratic peace. Political Psychology, 20, 803-827.
26. Gilboa, E. (2000). Mass communication and diplomacy: A theoretical framework. Communication
27. Theory, 10, 275-309.
28. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29. Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology,94, 53-78.
30. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Johnson, J. (1993). Is talk really cheap? Prompting conversation between critical theory and rational choice. American Political Science Review, 87, 74-86.
32. Johnson, M. A. (1997). Predicting news flow from Mexico. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 315-330.
33. Kunczik, M. (1997). Images of nations and international public relations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Lawrence, R. G. (2001). Defining events: Problem definition in the media arena. In R. P. Hart & B. H. Sparrow (Eds.), Politics, discourse, and American society (pp. 91-110). Lanham, MD: Routledge.
35. Manheim, J. B. (1994). Strategic public diplomacy and American foreign policy: The evolution of influence. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Maoz, Z., Kuperman, R. D., Terris, L., & Talmud, I. (2006). Structural equivalence and international conflict: A social network analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 664-689.
37. Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58, 258-279.
38. Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). "Mediatization" of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political communication, 16, 247-262.
39. Mueller, C. (1973). The politics of communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
41. Page, B. I., & Bouton M. M. (2006). The foreign policy disconnect: What Americans want from our leaders but don't get. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2003). Framing as a strategic action in publication deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 35-66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103-122.
44. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 297-316.
45. Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (1996). "To thine own self be true": Values, framing, and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23, 509-560.
46. Sheafer, T. (2001). Charismatic skill and media legitimacy: An actor-centered approach to understanding the political communication competition. Communication Research, 28, 711-736.
47. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
48. Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57, 60-78.
49. Van Ham, P. (2003). War, lies and videotape: Pubic diplomacy and the USA's war on terrorism. Security Dialogue, 34, 427-444.
50. Wolfsfeld, G. (1997). Media and political conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Wolfsfeld, G., & Sheafer, T. (2006). Competing actors and the construction of political news: The contest over waves in Israel. Political Communication, 23, 333-354.
52. Wu, H. D. (2000). The systemic determinants of international news coverage: A comparison of 38 countries. Journal of Communication, 50, 110-130.
53. Yoon, Y. (2005). Legitimacy, public relations, and media access: Proposing and testing a media access model. Communication Research, 32, 762-793.
54. Zhou, Y., & Moy, P. (2007). Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication, 57, 79-98.