Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case

International Journal of Press/Politics

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 87-102

  Entman, Robert M ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cascading network activation model; Media and foreign policy; Public diplomacy; Public opinion and foreign policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 41349085647     PISSN: 19401612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1940161208314657     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BBC World Service. 2006.
2. Bennett, W. Lance. 1990. " Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States." Journal of Communication 40 (2). 103-25.
3. Bennett, W. Lance, Regina Lawrence, and Steven Livingston. 2007. When the Press Fails. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Dallek, Robert. 1982. National Mood and American Foreign Policy: A Suggestive Essay. American Quarterly 34 ( Au tumn):
5. Edelman, Murray. 1988. Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Defense Science Board. 2004. Report of the Defense Science BoardTask Force on Stra tegic Communication. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics.
7. Entman, Robert M., Steven Livingston, and Jennie Kim. N.d. "Doomed to Repeat: Media in the Iraq War, 2003-2007." American Behavioral Scientist. Forthcoming.
8. Entman, Robert M. 1989. Democracy without Citizens. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Entman, Robert M. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Feaver, Peter, and Christopher Gelpi. 2004. Choosing Your Battles. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11. Gentzkow, Matthew A., and Jesse M. Shapiro. 2003. " Media, Education and Anti-Americanism in the Muslim World." Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (3). 117-33.
12. Gilboa, Eytan. 2002. " Global Communication and Foreign Policy." Journal of Communication 52(December) 731-48.
13. Hopf, Ted. 1998. " The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory." International Security 23 (1). 171-200.
14. Jentleson, Bruce, and Rebecca L. Britton. 1998. " Still Pretty Prudent: Post- Col d War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force." Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(August):
15. Jones, Bryan D., and Frank Baumgardner. 2005. The Politics ofAttention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Justus, Z.S., and Aaron Hess. 2006. " One Message for Many Audiences: Framing the Death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi." Report #0506 (June 23). Tempe Arizona State University Consortium for Stra tegic Communication.
17. Kull, Steven, and I.M. Destler 1999. Misreading the Public. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
18. Kull, Steven, and Clay Ramsay. 2002. " How Policymakers Misperceive U.S. Public Opinion on Foreign Policy." In Navigating Public Opinion, eds. Jeff Manza, Fay Lomax Cook, and Benjamin Page. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Le, Elisabeth. 2006. The Spiral of Anti-Other Rhetoric: Discourses of Identity and the International Media Echo. New York: John Benjamins Publishing.
20. Lord, Kristin. 2005. " What Academics (Should Have to) Say about Public Diplomacy." Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Political Communication Pre-Conference, Washington, D. C.
21. Lord, Kristin. 2007. " The Struggle for Mens Minds: Public Diplomacy and U.S. National Security." Unpublished manuscript.
22. Mermin, Daniel 1999. DebatingWar and Peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23. Nye, Joseph S., Jr. 2002. The Paradox of American Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Page, Benjamin I. 2006. The Foreign Policy Disconnect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Paterson, Chris. 2000. " Transference of Frames in Global Television." In Framing Public Life, eds. Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy, Jr., and August E. Grant. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications.
26. Robinson, Piers. 2002. The CNN Effect:The Myth of News, Foreign Policy and Intervention. London: Routledge.
27. Sobel, Richard. 2001. The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy since Vietnam: Constraining the Colossus. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Wike, Richard. 2007. " Karen Hughes Uphill Battle: Foreign Policy, Not Public Diplomacy, Mostly Determines How the World Views America." November 1. < http://pewresearch.org/pubs/627/karen-hughes>.