Comparative cladistics

Cladistics

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 624-659

  Sereno, Paul C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MORPHOLOGY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 70350451947     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00265.x     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Blanco, W., Gaitros, C., Gaitros, D., Jammigumpula, N., Maneva-Jakimoska, K., Paul, D., Ronquist, F., Seltmann, K., Winner, S., 2006. MorphBank, version 2.2. http://www.morphbank.net
2. Brower, A.V.Z., 2000. Homology and the inference of systematic relationships: some historical and philosophical perspectives. In : Scotland, R., Pennington, R.T. (Eds Homology and Systematics. Systematics Association, Special Volume Series 58, London, pp. 10 21.
3. Brower, A.V.Z., Schawaroch, V., 1996. Three steps of homology assessment. Cladistics 12, 265 272.
4. Brudno, M., Do, C.B., Cooper, G.M., Kim, M.F., Davydov, E., 2003. LAGAN and multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Res. 13, 721 731.
5. Bryant, H.N., 1989. An evaluation of cladistic and character analyses as hypothetico-deductive procedures, and the consequences for character weighting. Syst. Zool. 38, 214 227.
6. Carr, T.D., Williamson, T.E., Schwimmer, D.R., 2005. A new genus and species of tyrannosauroid from the Late Cretaceous (Middle Campanian) Demopolis Formation of Alabama. J. Vert. Paleontol. 25, 119 143.
7. Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Clark, A.G., Whittam, T.S., 1992. Sequencing errors and molecular evolutionary analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 744 752.
9. Coates, M., Ruta, M., 2000. Nice snake, shame about the legs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 503 507.
10. Currie, P.J., Hurum, J.H., Sabath, K., 2003. Skull structure and evolution in tyrannosaurid dinosaurs. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 48, 227 234.
11. Darwin, C., 1859. The Origins of Species by Natural Selection. John Murray, London.
12. Datta, S., van Engelen, R., Gaitros, D., Jammigumpula, N., 2007. Experiences with tracking the effects of changing requirements on Morphbank: a web-based bioinformatics application. In : John, D., Kerr, S. (Eds Proceedings of the 45th Annual Southeast Regional Conference, 23-24 March, Winston-Salem. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 413 418.
13. Day, W.H., McMorris, F.R., 1992. Critical comparison of consensus methods for molecular sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1093 1099.
14. De Laet, J., 2005. Parsimony and the problem of inapplicables in sequence data. In : Albert, V.A. (Ed Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 81 116.
15. De Pinna, M.C.C., 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7, 367 394.
16. Dettai, A., Bailly, N., Vignes-Lebbe, R., Lecointre, G., 2004. Metacanthomorpha: essay on a phylogeny-oriented database for morphology - the acanthomorph (Teleostei) example. Syst. Biol. 53, 822 834.
17. Donoghue, M.J., Kadereit, J.W., 1992. Walter Zimmermann and the growth of phylogenetic theory. Syst. Biol. 41, 74 85.
18. Dupuis, C., 1984. Willi Hennig's impact on taxonomic thought. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 1 25.
19. Farris, J.S., 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18, 374 385.
20. Farris, J.S., 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19, 83 92.
21. Forey, P.L., Kitching, I.J., 2000. Experiments in coding multistate characters. In : Scotland, R., Pennington, R.T. (Eds Homology and Systematics. Systematics Association, Special Volume Series 58, London, pp. 54 80.
22. Grant, T., Kluge, A.G., 2003. Data exploration in phylogenetic inference: scientific, heuristic, or neither. Cladistics 19, 379 418.
23. Griffiths, G.C.D., 1974. On the foundations of biological systematics. Acta Biotheor. 23, 85 131.
24. Harris, S.R., Pisani, D., Gower, D.J., Wilkinson, M., 2007. Investigating stagnation in morphological phylogenetics using consensus data. Syst. Biol. 56, 125 129.
25. Hawkins, J.A., 2000. A survey of primary homology assessment: different botanists perceive and define characters in different ways. In : Scotland, R., Pennington, R.T. (Eds Homology and Systematics. Systematics Association, Special Volume Series 58, London, pp. 22 53.
26. Hecht, M.K., Edwards, J.L., 1976. The determination of parallel or monophyletic relationships: the proteid salamanders - a test case. Am. Nat. 110, 653 677.
27. Hedges, S.B., Maxson, L.R., 1996. Molecules and morphology in amniote phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6, 312 314.
28. Hedges, S.B., Sibley, C.G., 1994. Molecules vs. morphology in avian evolution: the case of the "pelecaniform" birds. PNAS 91, 9861 9865.
29. Hennig, W., 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin.
30. Hennig, W., 1952. Die Larvenformen der Dipteren: Eine Übersicht über die bisher bekannten Jugendstadien der zweiflügeligen Insekten, 3rd edn. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.
31. Hennig, W., 1953. Kritische Bemerkungen zum phylogenetischen System der Insekten. Beitr. Entomol. Sonderh. 3, 1 85.
32. Hennig, W., 1965. Phylogenetic systematics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 10, 97 116.
33. Hennig, W., 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
34. Hennig, W., 1969. Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Kramer, Frankfurt.
35. Hill, R.V., 2005. Integration of morphological data sets for phylogenetic analysis of Amniota: the importance of integumentary characters and increased taxonomic sampling. Syst. Biol. 54, 530 547.
36. Hillis, D.M., 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst. Biol. 47, 3 8.
37. Hillis, D.M., Heath, T.A., John, K.S., 2005. Analysis and visualization of tree space. Syst. Biol. 54, 471 482.
38. Holtz, T.R. Jr., 2001. The phylogeny and taxonomy of the Tyrannosauridae. In : Carpenter, K., Tanke, D. (Eds Mesozoic Vertebrate Life. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 64 83.
39. Holtz, T.R. Jr., 2004. Tyrannosauroidea. In : Weishampel, D.B., Dodson, P., Osmólska, H. (Eds The Dinosauria. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 111 136.
40. Holtz, T.R. Jr., Molnar, R.E., Currie, P.J., 2004. Basal Tetanurae. In : Weishampel, D.B., Dodson, P., Osmólska, H. (Eds The Dinosauria. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 71 110.
41. Jenner, R.A., 2004. The scientific status of metazoan cladistics: why current practice must change. Zool. Scr. 33, 293 310.
42. Kearney, M., Rieppel, O., 2006. Rejecting the given in systematics. Cladistics 22, 369 377.
43. Kirsch, J.A.W., 1982. The builder and the bricks: notes toward a philosophy of characters. In : Archer, M. (Ed Carnivorous Marsupials. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney, pp. 587 594.
44. Kitching, I., Williams, D., Forey, P.L., Humphries, C.J., 1998. Cladistics: the theory and practice of parsimony analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
45. Kjer, K.M., Gillespie, J.J., Ober, K.A., 2007. Opinions on multiple sequence alignment, and an empirical comparison of repeatability and accuracy between POY and structural alignment. Syst. Biol. 56, 133 146.
46. Kluge, A.G., 1991. Boine snake phylogeny and research cycles. Misc. Publ., Mus. Zool., Univ. Mich. 178, 1 58.
47. Kluge, A.G., 1998. Total evidence or taxonomic congruence: cladistics or consensus classification. Cladistics 14, 151 158.
48. Kluge, A.G., 2003. The repugnant and the mature in phylogenetic inference: atemporal similarity and historical identity. Cladistics 19, 356 368.
49. Kluge, A.G., Farris, J.S., 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of the anurans. Syst. Zool. 18, 1 32.
50. Knight, A., Mindell, D.P., 1993. Substitution bias, weighting of DNA sequence evolution, and the phylogenetic position of Fea's viper. Syst. Biol. 42, 18 31. (Pubitemid 23983093)
51. Lee, M.S.Y., 2001. Molecules, morphology, and the monophyly of diapsid reptiles. Contrib. Zool. 70, 1 22.
52. Li, C., Wu, X.C., Rieppel, O., Wang, L.T., Zhao, L.J., 2008. An ancestral turtle from the Late Triassic of southwestern China. Nature 456, 497 501.
53. Mabee, P.M., Ashburner, M., Cronk, Q., Gkoutos, G.V., Haendel, M., Segerdell, E., Mungall, C., Westerfield, M., 2007. Phenotype ontologies: the bridge between genomics and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 345 350.
54. Maddison, D.R., Maddison, W.P., 2003. MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, ver. 4.06.
55. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2005. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis, ver. 1.06. http://mesquiteproject.org
56. Maddison, W.P., Donoghue, M.J., Maddison, P.R., 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33, 83 103.
57. Maddison, D.R., Swofford, D.L., Maddison, W.P., 1997. NEXUS: an extensible file format for systematic information. Syst. Biol. 46, 590 621.
58. Marsh, O.C., 1879. Notice of new Jurassic reptiles. Am. J. Sci. (Ser. 3) 18, 501 505.
59. Mickevich, M.F., 1982. Transformation series analysis. Syst. Zool. 31, 461 478.
60. Mishler, B.D., 1994. Cladistic analysis of molecular and morphological data. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 94, 143 156.
61. Mishler, B.D., 2000. Deep phylogenetic relationships among "plants" and their implications for classification. Taxon 49, 661 683.
62. Mishler, B.D., 2005. The logic of the data matrix in phylogenetic analysis. In : Albert, V.A. (Ed Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 57 70.
63. Miyamoto, M.M., Fitch, W.M., 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44, 64 76.
64. Neff, N.A., 1986. A rational basis for a priori character weighting. Syst. Zool. 35, 110 123.
65. O'Hara, R.J., 1992. Telling the tree: narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history. Biol. Phil. 7, 135 160.
66. Patterson, C., 1982. Morphological characters and homology. In : Joysey, A., Friday, A.E. (Eds Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Academic Press, London, pp. 21 74.
67. Patterson, C., Johnson, G.D., 1997. The data, the matrix, and the message: comments on Begle's "Relationships of the osmeroid fishes". Syst. Biol. 46, 358 365.
68. Pennisi, E., 2003. Modernizing the tree of life. Science 300, 1692 1697.
69. Poe, S., Wiens, J.J., 2000. Character selection and the methodology of morphological phylogenetics. In : Wiens, J.J. (Ed Phylogenetic Analysis of Morphological Data. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 20 36.
70. Pogue, M.G., Mickevich, M.F., 1990. Character definitions and character state delineation: the bête noir of phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 6, 319 361.
71. Pol, D., 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of basal Sauropodomorpha. PhD thesis, Department of Geosciences, Columbia University, New York.
72. Ramírez, M.J., Coddington, J.A., Maddison, W.P., Midford, P.E., Prendini, L., Miller, J., Griswold, C.E., Hormiga, G., Sierwald, P., Scharff, N., Benjamin, S.P., Wheeler, W.C., 2007. Linking of digital images to phylogenetic data matrices using a morphological ontology. Syst. Biol. 56, 283 294.
73. Richter, S., Meier, R., 1994. The development of phylogenetic concepts in Hennig's early theoretical publications (1947-1966). Syst. Biol. 43, 212 221. (Pubitemid 24977975)
74. Rieppel, O., 2004. What happens when the language of science threatens to break down in systematics: a Popperian perspective. In : Williams, D.M., Forey, P.L. (Eds Milestones in Systematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 57 100.
75. Rieppel, O., 2006. The merits of similarity reconsidered. Syst. Biodiv. 4, 137 147.
76. Rieppel, O., Kearney, M., 2002. Similarity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75, 59 82.
77. Rieppel, O., Kearney, M., 2007. The poverty of taxonomic characters. Biol. Phil. 22, 95 113.
78. Rieppel, O., Reisz, R.R., 1999. The origin and early evolution of turtles. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 1 22.
79. Rieppel, O., Zaher, H., 2000. The intramandibular joint in squamates, and the phylogenetic relationships of the fossil snake Pachyrhachis problematicus Haas. Fieldiana Geol. 43, 1 69.
80. Scotland, R., Pennington, R.T. (Eds 2000. Homology and Systematics. Systematics Association, Special Volume Series 58, London.
81. Scotland, R.W., Olmstead, R.G., Bennett, J.R., 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology. Syst. Biol. 52, 539 548.
82. Sereno, P.C., 1984. The phylogeny of Ornithischia: a reappraisal. In : Reif, W.E., Westphal, F. (Eds Third Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems, Short Papers. Attempto Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 219 226.
83. Sereno, P.C., 2004. CharacterSearch: online database for characters. J. Vert. Paleontol. 24, 112A.
84. Sereno, P.C., 2007. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics 23, 565 587.
85. Sereno, P.C., Brusatte, S.L., 2009. Comparative assessment of tyrannosaurid interrelationships. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 7 271, 1325 1330.
86. Smythe, A.B., Sanderson, M.J., Nadler, S.A., 2006. Nematode small subunit phylogeny correlates with alignment parameters. Syst. Biol. 55, 972 992.
87. Stevens, P.F., 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: a review. Syst. Bot. 16, 553 583.
88. Stevens, P.F., 2000. On characters and character states: do overlapping and non-overlapping variation, morphology and molecules all yield data of the same value? In : Scotland, R., Pennington, R.T. (Eds Homology and Systematics. Systematics Association, Special Volume Series 58, London, pp. 81 105.
89. Thacker, P.D., 2003. Morphology: the shape of things to come. Bioscience 53, 544 549.
90. Thompson, J.D., 1999. BAliBASE: a benchmark alignment database for the evaluation of multiple alignment programs. Bioinformatics 15, 87 88.
91. Wägele, J.W., 2004. Hennig's phylogenetic systematics brought up to date. In : Scotland, R., Pennington, R.T. (Eds Homology and Systematics. Systematics Association, Special Volume Series 58, London, pp. 101 125.
92. Wagner, G.P. (Ed 2001. The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology. Academic Press, San Diego.
93. Watanabe, M., 2002. Describing the "tree of life": attainable goal or stuff of dreams? Bioscience 52, 875 880.
94. Wheeler, Q.D., 1986. Character weighting and cladistic analysis. Syst. Zool. 35, 102 109.
95. Wheeler, W.C., 2001. Homology and the optimization of DNA sequence data. Cladistics 17, 3 11.
96. Wheeler, W.C., 2003. Implied alignment: a synapomorphy-based multiple-sequence alignment method and its use in cladogram search. Cladistics 19, 261 268.
97. Wiens, J.J., 2001. Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: problems and solutions. Syst. Biol. 50, 689 699.
98. Wilkinson, M., 1995. Coping with abundant missing entries in phylogenetic inference using parsimony. Syst. Biol. 44, 501 514.
99. Woodger, J.H., 1952. Science without properties. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 2, 193 216.