Selfing and sibship structure in a two-cohort stand of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) using nuclear SSR markers

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 115-121

  González Martínez, Santiago C ^a,b   Gerber, Sophie ^c   Cervera, María Teresa ^d   Martínez Zapater, José Miguel ^d   Alía, Ricardo ^a   Gil, Luis ^b  

^a Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

^b ETSIM   (Spain)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

^d CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Genetic relatedness; Mating system; Mediterranean region; Microsatellites; Pinus pinaster

Indexed keywords

GENE FLOW; REGENERATION; RELATEDNESS; TREE;

EMBRYOPHYTA; PINUS PINASTER; TRANSPOSONS;

EID: 17944403639     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2003003     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams W.T., Burczyk J., Magnitude and implications of gene flow in Gene Conservation Reserves, in: Boyle T., Boshier D., Young A. (Eds.), Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice, CSIRO, Australia, 2000, pp. 215-224.
2. Alderson G., Gibbs H., Sealy S., Parentage and kinship studies in an obligate brood parasitic bird, the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater), using microsatellite DNA markers, J. Hered. 90 (1999) 182-190.
3. Alía R., Gil L., Pardos J.A., Performance of 43 Pinus pinaster provenances on 5 locations in Central Spain, Silvae Genet. 44 (1995) 75-81.
4. Alía R., Moro J., Denis J.B., Performance of Pinus pinaster provenances in Spain: interpretation of the genotype by environment interaction, Can. J. For. Res. 27 (1997) 1548-1559.
5. Baradat Ph., Marpeau A., Le Pin maritime, Pinus pinaster. Biologie et génétique des terpènes pour la conaissance et l'amélioration de l'espèce, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Bordeaux I, Bordeaux, 1988.
6. Blouin M.S., Parsons M., Lacaille V., Lotz S., Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness, Mol. Ecol. 5 (1996) 393-401.
7. Boshier D.H., Chase M.R., Bawa K.S., Population genetics of Cordia alliodora (Boraginaceae), a neotropical tree. 3. Gene flow, neighbourhood, and population substructure, Am. J. Bot. 82 (1995) 484-490.
8. Brenner C.H., Symbolic kinship program, Genetics 145 (1997) 535-542.
9. Brown A.H.D., Isozymes, plant population genetic structure and genetic conservation, Theor. Appl. Genet. 52 (1978) 145-157.
10. Burczyk J., Mating system variation in a Scots pine clonal seed orchard, Silvae genet. 47 (1998) 155-158.
11. Burczyk J., Adams W.T., Shimizu J., Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon.) stand, Heredity 77 (1996) 251-260.
12. Chakraborty R., Meagher T.R., Smouse P.E., Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity, Genetics 118 (1998) 527-536.
13. Costa M., Morla C., Saínz H. (Eds.), Los bosques ibéricos, Planeta, Barcelona, 1997.
14. Dellaporta S.L., Wood J., Hicks J.B., A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II, Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1 (1983) 19-21.
15. Dow B., Ashley M., Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa, Mol. Ecol. 5 (1996) 615-627.
16. Durel C.E., Berlin P., Kremer A., Relationship between depression and inbreeding coefficient in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster), Theor. Appl. Genet. 92 (1996) 347-356.
17. Gandon S., Kin competition, the cost of imbreeding and the evolution of dispersal, J. Theor. Biol. 200 (1999) 345-364.
18. Gerber S., Mariette S., Streiff R., Bodénès C., Kremer A., Comparison of microsatellites and AFLP markers for parentage analysis, Mol. Ecol. 9 (2000) 1037-1048.
19. Gil L., Gordo J., Alía R., Catalán G., Pardos J.A., Pinus pinaster Aiton en el paisaje vegetal de la Península Ibérica, Ecología Fuera de Serie 1 (1990) 469-495.
20. González-Martínez S.C., Gerber S., Cervera M.T., Martínez-Zapater J.M., Gil L., Alía R., Seed gene flow and fine-scale structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) using nuclear microsatellite markers, Theor. Appl. Genet. 104 (2002) 1290-1297.
21. Hamrick J.L., Murawski D.A., Nason J.D., The influence of seed dispersal mechanisms on the genetic structure of tropical tree populations, Vegetatio 107/108 (1993) 281-297.
22. Jamieson A., Taylor S.S., Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion, Anim. Genet. 28 (1997) 397-400.
23. Kinlaw C.S., Neale D.B., Complex gene families in pine genomes, Trends Plant Sci. 2 (1997) 356-359.
24. Ledig F.T., Genetic variation in Pinus, in: Richardson D.M. (Ed.), Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 251-280.
25. Loiselle B.A., Sork V.L., Nason J., Graham C., Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae), Am. J. Bot. 82 (1995) 1420-1425.
26. Lynch M., Ritland K., Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers, Genetics 152 (1999) 1753-1766.
27. Mariette S., Chagné D., Decroocq S., Vendramin G.G., Lalanne C., Madur D., Plomion C., Microsatellite markers for Pinus pinaster Ait., Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 203-206.
28. Meagher T.R., Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. II. Patterns of male reproductive success, Am. Nat. 137 (1991) 738-752.
29. Miguel I., González-Martínez S.C., Alía R., Gil L., Growth phenology and mating system of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) in central Spain, Invest. Agr.: Sist. Rec. For. 11 (2002) 193-204.
30. Mitton J.B., Latta R.G., Rehfeldt G.E., The pattern of inbreeding in Washoe pine and survival of inbred progeny under optimal environmental conditions, Silvae Genet. 46 (1997) 215-219.
31. Mitton J.B., Linhart Y.B., Davis M.L., Sturgeon K.B., Estimation of outcrossing rate in ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa Laws., from patterns of segregation of protein polymorphisms and from frequencies of albino seedlings, Silvae Genet. 30 (1981) 117-121.
32. Morgante M., Vendramin G.G., Olivieri A.M., Mating system analysis in Pinus leucodermis Ant.: detection of self-fertilizations in natural populations, Heredity 67 (1991) 197-203.
33. Morgante M., Vendramin G.G., Rossi P., Olivieri A.M., Selection against inbreds in early life-cycle phases in Pinus leucodermis Ant., Heredity 70 (1993) 622-627.
34. Muona O., Yazdani R., Rudin D., Genetic change between life stages in Pinus sylvestris: allozyme variation in seeds and planted seedlings, Silvae Genet. 36 (1987) 39-41.
35. Parker K.C., Hamrick J.L., Parker A.J., Nason J.D., Fine-scale genetic structure in Pinus clausa (Pinaceae) populations: effects of disturbance history, Heredity 87 (2001) 99-113.
36. Primmer C.R., Moller A.P., Ellegren H., Resolving genetic relationships with microsatellite markers: a parentage testing system for the swallow Hirundo rustica, Mol. Ecol. 4 (1995) 493-498.
37. Queller D.C., Goodnight K.F., Estimating relatedness using genetic markers, Evolution 43 (1989) 258-275.
38. Ritland K., Estimators of pairwise relatedness and inbreeding coefficients, Genet. Res. 67 (1996) 175-186.
39. Ritland K., Marker-inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature, Mol. Ecol. 9 (2000) 1195-1204.
40. Ronfort J., Couvet D., A stochastic model of selection on selfing rates in structured populations, Genet. Res., Camb. 65 (1995) 209-222.
41. Salvador L., Alía R., Agúndez L., Gil L., Genetic variation and migration pathways of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in the Iberian Peninsula, Theor. Appl. Genet. 100 (2000) 89-95.
42. Schnabel A., Parentage analysis in plants: mating systems, gene flow, and relative fertilities, in: Carvalho G.R. (Ed.), Advances in Molecular Ecology, IOS Press, The Netherlands, 1998, pp. 173-189.
43. Schnabel A., Laushman R.H., Hamrick J.L., Comparative analysis of population genetic structure of two co-occurring tree species, Maclura pomifera (Moraceae) and Gleditsia triacanthos (Leguminosae), Heredity 67 (1991) 357-364.
44. Schuster W.S.F., Mitton J.B., Relatedness within clusters of a bird-dispersed pine and the potential for kin interactions, Heredity 67 (1991) 41-48.
45. Sorensen F.C., White T.L., Effect of natural inbreeding on variance structure in tests of wind-pollination Douglas-fir progenies, For. Sci. 34 (1988) 102-118.
46. Taylor A.C., Cowan P.E., Fricke B.L., Cooper D.W., Genetic analysis of the mating system of the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) in New Zealand farmland, Mol. Ecol. 9 (2000) 869-879.
47. Thompson E.A., Estimation of relationships from genetic data, in: Rao C.R., Chakraborty R. (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 255-269.
48. Thompson E.A., Meagher T.R., Parental and sib likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction, Biometrics 43 (1987) 585-600.
49. Uyenoyama M.K., Holsinger K.E., Waller D.M., Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 9 (1993) 327-381.
50. Wakamiya I., Newton R.J., Johnston J.S., Price H.J., Genome size and environmental factors in the genus Pinus, Am. J. Bot. 80 (1993) 1235-1241.
51. Yazdani R., Lindgren D., Stewart S., Gene dispersion within a population of Pinus sylvestris, Scand. J. For. Res. 4 (1989) 295-306.