Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1577-1588

  Hardy, Olivier J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

AFLP; Dominant markers; Isolation by distance; Neighbourhood size; RAPD; Relatedness

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, DOMINANT; GENETICS, POPULATION; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0038040627     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01835.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Albertson RC, Markert JA, Danley PD, Kocher TD (1999) Phylogeny of a rapidly evolving clade: the cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, East Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96, 5107-5110.
2. Barton NH, Depaulis F, Etheridge AM (2002) Neutral evolution in spatially continuous populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 61, 31-48.
3. Cockerham CC, Weir BS (1984) Covariances of relatives stemming from a population undergoing mixed self and random mating. Biometrics, 40, 157-164.
4. Degen B, Caron H, Bandou E et al. (2001a) Small scale spatial genetic structure of six tropical tree species in French Guiana. In: Genetic Response of Forest Systems to Changing Environmental Conditions (eds Müller-Starck G, Schubert R), pp. 75-92. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
5. Degen B, Caron H, Bandou E et al. (2001b) Fine-scale spatial genetic structure of eight tropical species as analysed by RAPDs. Heredity, 87, 497-507.
6. Dutech C, Seiter J, Petronelli P, Joly HI, Jame P (2002) Evidence of low gene flow in a neotropical clustered tree species in two rainforest stands of French Guiana. Molecular Ecology, 11, 725-738.
7. Estoup A, Angers B (1998) Microsatellites and minisatellites for molecular ecology: theoretical and empirical considerations. In: Advances in Molecular Ecology (ed. Carvalho GR), pp. 55-86. IOS Press, Amsterdam.
8. Gerber S, Mariette S, Streiff R, Bodénès C, Kremer A (2000) Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1037-1048.
9. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (1999) Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation analysis and population genetics models. Heredity, 83, 145-154.
10. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2, 618-620.
11. Holsinger KE, Lewis PO, Dey DK (2002) A Bayesian approach to inferring population structure from dominant markers. Molecular Ecology, 11, 1157-1164.
12. Kalisz S, Nason JD, Hanzawa FM, Tonsor SJ (2001) Spatial population genetic structure in Trillium grandiflorum: The roles of dispersal, mating, history and selection. Evolution, 55, 1560-1568.
13. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995) Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 82, 1420-1425.
14. Lynch M, Milligan BG (1994) Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Molecular Ecology, 3, 91-99.
15. Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics, 152, 1753-1766.
16. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland MA.
17. Mousseau TA, Ritland K, Heath DD (1998) A novel method for estimating heritability using molecular markers. Heredity, 80, 218-224.
18. Mueller UG, Wolfenbarger LL (1999) AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 389-394.
19. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution, 43, 258-275.
20. Ritland K (1996) Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genetics Research, Cambridge, 67, 175-185.
21. Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics, 145, 1219-1228.
22. Rousset F (2000) Genetic differentiation between individuals. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 58-62.
23. Rousset F (2002) Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure? Heredity, 88, 371-380.
24. Streiff R, Labbe T, Bacilieri R et al. (1998) Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. & Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Molecular Ecology, 7, 317-328.
25. Thompson EA (1975) The estimation of pairwise relationships. Annals of Human Genetics, 39, 173-188.
26. Wang J (2002) An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics, 160, 1203-1215.
27. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370.
28. Wilding CS, Butlin RK, Grahame J (2001) Differential gene exchange between parapatric morphs of Littorina saxatilis detected using AFLP markers. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14, 611-619.
29. Wright S (1922) Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist, 56, 330-338.
30. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics, 28, 114-138.