Use and trust of simple independent open learner models to support learning within and across courses

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5535 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 42-53

  Bull, Susan ^a   Gardner, Peter ^a   Ahmad, Norasnita ^a   Ting, Jeffrey ^a   Clarke, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Learner independence; Open learner models; User trust

Indexed keywords

LEARNER INDEPENDENCE; LEARNER MODEL; LEARNING OUTCOME; MODULAR EXTENSION; OPEN LEARNER MODELS; SELF-ASSESSMENT; SUPPORT LEARNING; UNIVERSITY COURSE; USER LOG; USER TRUST;

EID: 70349798302     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Robinson, S.L.: Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract. Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 574-599 (1996)
2. Lewis, J.D., Weigert, A.: Trust as Social Reality. J. Social Forces 63, 967-985 (1985)
3. Madsen, M., Gregor, S.: Measuring Human-Computer Trust. In: Gable, G., Viatle, M. (eds.) 11th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, vol.53 (2000)
4. Tanimoto, S.: Dimensions of Transparency in Open Learner Models. In: LeMoRe Workshop, Artificial Intelligence in Education 2005, pp. 100-106 (2005)
5. Bull, S., Kay, J.: Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI Open Learner Modelling Framework. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 17(2), 89-120 (2007)
6. Ahmad, N., Bull, S.: Do Students Trust their Open Learner Models? In: Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P., Herder, E. (eds.) AH 2008. LNCS, vol.5149, pp. 255-258. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
7. Ahmad, N., Bull, S.: Learner Trust in Learner Model Externalisations. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education 2009, IOS Press, Amsterdam (in press)
8. Land, S.M., Hanaffin, M.J.: Student-Centered Learning Environments: Foundations, Assumptions, and Implications. In: 18th Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, IN, pp. 394-400 (1996)
9. Higher Education Academy/Juwah et al. Enhancing Student Learning Through Effective Formative Feedback (2004), http://www.heacademy.ac.uk
10. Bull, S., Kay, J.: Metacognition and Open Learner Models. In: Workshop on Metacogni-tion and Self-Regulated Learning in Educational Technologies. Int. Tutoring Systems (2008)
11. Kay, J.: Learner Know Thyself: Student Models to Give Learner Control and Responsibility. In: Halim, Z., Ottomann, T., Razak, Z. (eds.) Int. Conference on Computers in Education, AACE, pp. 17-24 (1997)
12. Boud, D.: Promoting Reflection in Learning: a Model. In: Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D. (eds.) Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, Kogan Page, London, pp. 18-40. Nichols Pub., New York (1985)
13. Schon, D.: The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, USA (1983)
14. Dimitrova, V.: StyLE-OLM: Interactive Open Learner Modelling. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13(1), 35-78 (2003)
15. Mabbott, A., Bull, S.: Alternative views on knowledge: Presentation of open learner models. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol.3220, pp. 689-698. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
16. Perez-Marin, D., Alfonseca, E., Rodriguez, P., Pascual-Neito, I.: A Study on the Possibility of Automatically Estimating the Confidence Value of Students' Knowledge in Generated Conceptual Models. J. of Computers 2(5), 17-26 (2007)
17. Zapata-Rivera, J.D., Greer, J.E.: Interacting with Inspectable Bayesian Models. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 14, 127-163 (2004)
18. Bull, S., Mabbott, A., Gardner, P., Jackson, T., Lancaster, M., Quigley, S., Childs, P.A.: Supporting Interaction P and Recognition of Misconceptions with Independent Open Learner Models. In: Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P., Herder, E. (eds.) AH 2008. LNCS, vol.5149, pp. 62-72. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
19. Mitrovic, A., Martin, B.: Evaluating the Effect of Open Student Models on Self-Assessment. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17(2), 121-144 (2007)
20. Weber, G., Brusilovsky, P.: ELM-ART: An Adaptive Versatile System for Web-Based Instruction. Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12, 351-384 (2001)
21. Engineering Council. UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence, The Accreditation of Higher Education Programmes (2004), http://www.engc.org. uk/documents/Accreditation-HE-Progs.pdf
22. Biggs, J., Tang, C.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw Hill, OUP (2007)
23. Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET). Handbook of Learning Outcomes for BEng and MEng Degree Programmes (2006), http://www2.theiet.org
24. Jameson, A.: Adaptive Interfaces and Agents. In: Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, 2nd edn., Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, Mahwah (2007)
25. Bull, S., Quigley, S., Mabbott, A.: Computer-Based Formative Assessment to Promote Reflection and Learner Autonomy. Engineering Education 1, 8-18 (2006)
26. Buzzetto-More, N.A., Alade, A.J., Panda, D.: Using e-Learning to Drive a Student Learning Outcomes Based Assessment Program. In: Buzzetto-More, N.A. (ed.) Advanced Principles of Effective e-Learning, pp. 213-244. Informing Science Press, CA (2007)
27. Maddocks, A.: EASIMAP: A Coherent Approach to the Assessment of Learning Outcomes on Engineering Degree Programmes. Engineering Education 2(2), 26-32 (2007)
28. Avitabile, P., McKelliget, J., Van Zandt, T.: Interweaving Numerical Processing Techniques in Multisemester Projects. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering (2005)