A novel method for predicting and using distance constraints of high accuracy for refining protein structure prediction

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 220-234

  Liu, Tianyun ^a,b   Horst, Jeremy A ^b,c   Samudrala, Ram ^b,c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge based functions; Protein structure prediction; Refinement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 70349313259     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22434     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Moult J. Predicting protein three-dimensional structure. Curr Opin Biotechnol 1999;10:583-588.
2. Schonbrun J, Wedemeyer WJ, Baker D. Protein structure prediction in 2002. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:348-354.
3. Moult J. A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005;15:285-289. (Pubitemid 40826447)
4. Krieger E, Nabuurs SB, Vriend G. Homology modeling. In: Bourne PE, Weissig H, editors. Structural bioinformatics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss; 2003. pp 509-523.
5. Chakravarty S, Wang L, Sanchez R. Accuracy of structure-derived properties in simple comparative models of protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:244-259. (Pubitemid 40276946)
6. Cozzetto D, Tramontano A. Relationship between multiple sequence alignments and quality of protein comparative models. Proteins 2005;58:151-157. (Pubitemid 39665626)
7. Bradley P, Misura KM, Baker D. Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 2005;309:1868-1871. (Pubitemid 41325099)
8. Valencia A. Protein refinement: a new challenge for CASP in its 10th anniversary. Bioinformatics 2005;21:277. (Pubitemid 40246597)
9. de Bakker PI, Furnham N, Blundell TL, DePristo MA. Conformer generation under restraints. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:160-165.
10. Sali A, Overington JP, Johnson MS, Blundell TL. From comparisons of protein sequences and structures to protein modelling and design. Trends Biochem Sci 1990;15:235-240. (Pubitemid 20175357)
11. Fiser A, Sali A. Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. Methods Enzymol 2003;374:461-491. (Pubitemid 37531821)
12. Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Bradley P, Misura K, Baker D. Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions. Science 2005;310:638-642. (Pubitemid 41528148)
13. Havel TF, Kuntz ID, Crippen GM. The combinatorial distance geometry method for the calculation of molecular conformation. I. A new approach to an old problem. J Theor Biol 1983;104:359-381.
14. Aszodi A, Gradwell MJ, Taylor WR. Global fold determination from a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 1995;251:308-326.
15. Aszodi A, Munro RE, Taylor WR. Protein modeling by multiple sequence threading and distance geometry. Proteins 1997;29(Suppl 1):38-42. (Pubitemid 28090479)
16. Hanggi G, Braun W. Pattern recognition and self-correcting distance geometry calculations applied to myohemerythrin. FEBS Lett 1994;344:147-153. (Pubitemid 24154628)
17. Mumenthaler C, Braun W. Predicting the helix packing of globular proteins by self-correcting distance geometry. Protein Sci 1995;4:863-871.
18. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz AR. Monsster: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 1997;265:217-241. (Pubitemid 27110659)
19. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Fold assembly of small proteins using monte carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol 1998;277:419-448. (Pubitemid 28174978)
20. Guntert P, Mumenthaler C, Wuthrich K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J Mol Biol 1997;273:283-298. (Pubitemid 27460230)
21. Ramachandran GN, Sasisekharan V. Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Adv Protein Chem 1968;23:283-438.
22. Smith-Brown MJ, Kominos D, Levy RM. Global folding of proteins using a limited number of distance constraints. Protein Eng 1993;6:605-614. (Pubitemid 23246511)
23. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Assembly of protein structure from sparse experimental data: an efficient monte carlo model. Proteins 1998;32:475-494. (Pubitemid 28380787)
24. Huang ES, Samudrala R, Ponder JW. Distance geometry generates native-like folds for small helical proteins using the consensus distances of predicted protein structures. Protein Sci 1998;7:1998-2003. (Pubitemid 28432441)
25. Huang ES, Samudrala R, Ponder JW. Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge based scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1999;290:267-281. (Pubitemid 29308590)
26. Qian B, Raman S, Das R, Bradley P, McCoy AJ, Read RJ, Baker D. High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem. Nature 2007;450:259-264. (Pubitemid 350100534)
27. Hung LH, Samudrala R. An automated assignment-free Bayesian approach for accurately identifying proton contacts from NOESY data. J Biomol NMR 2006;36:189-198. (Pubitemid 44740882)
28. Young MM, Tang N, Hempel JC, Oshiro CM, Taylor EW, Kuntz ID, Gibson BW, Dollinger G. High throughput protein fold identification by using experimental constraints derived from intramolecular cross-links and mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:5802-5806. (Pubitemid 30367479)
29. Latek D, Kolinski A. Contact prediction in protein modeling: scoring, folding and refinement of coarse-grained models. BMC Struct Biol 2008;8:36.
30. Grana O, Baker D, MacCallum RM, Meiler J, Punta M, Rost B, Tress ML, Valencia A. CASP6 assessment of contact prediction. Proteins 2005;61:214-224.
31. Godzik A. The structural alignment between two proteins: is there a unique answer? Protein Sci 1996;5:1325-1338.
32. Wallner B, Elofsson A. All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Sci 2005;14:1315-1327. (Pubitemid 40577811)
33. Kraulis P. Molscript: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1991;24:946-950.
34. Merritt EA, Bacon DJ. Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol 1997;277:505-524.
35. Bower MJ, Cohen FE, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J Mol Biol 1997;267:1268-1282.
36. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846. (Pubitemid 27113219)
37. Levitt M, Hirshberg M, Sharon R, Daggett V. Potential energy function and parameters for simulations of the molecular dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids in solution. Comput Phys Commun 1995;91:215-231.
38. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916. (Pubitemid 28077703)
39. Liu T, Samudrala R. The effect of experimental resolution on the performance of knowledge based discriminatory functions for protein structure selection. Protein Eng Des Sel 2006;19:431-437. (Pubitemid 44306061)
40. Jagielska A, Wroblewska L, Skolnick J. Protein model refinement using an optimized physics-based all-atom force field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:8268-8273. (Pubitemid 351904745)
41. Zhang C, Hou J, Kim SH. Fold prediction of helical proteins using torsion angle dynamics and predicted restraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:3581-3585. (Pubitemid 34252150)
42. Moglich A, Weinfurtner D, Maurer T, Gronwald W, Kalbitzer HR. A restraint molecular dynamics and simulated annealing approach for protein homology modeling utilizing mean angles. BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6:91. (Pubitemid 41363573)
43. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Rost B, Hubbard T, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction- Round VII. Proteins 2007;69(Suppl 8):3-9. (Pubitemid 350210108)
44. Wang K, Horst JA, Cheng G, Nickle DC, Samudrala R. Protein meta-functional signatures from combining sequence, structure, evolution, and amino acid property information. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000181.
45. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1015-1018. (Pubitemid 36675823)
46. Samudrala R,Moult J. Handling context-sensitivity in protein structures using graph theory: bona fide prediction. Proteins 1997;(Suppl 1):43-49.
47. Hung LH, Ngan SC, Liu T, Samudrala R. Protinfo: new algorithms for enhanced protein structure predictions. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:W77-W80. (Pubitemid 44529883)
48. Fischer D, Rychlewski L, Dunbrack RL, Jr, Ortiz AR, Elofsson A. CAFASP3: the third critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. Proteins 2003;53(Suppl 6):503-516. (Pubitemid 37352210)
49. Berman HM, Battistuz T, Bhat TN, Bluhm WF, Bourne PE, Burkhardt K, Feng Z, Gilliland GL, Iype L, Jain S, Fagan P, Marvin J, Padilla D, Ravichandran V, Schneider B, Thanki N, Weissig H, Westbrook JD, Zardecki C. The protein data bank. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2002;58:899-907.
50. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.