Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1774-1788

  Qazi, Mujtaba A ^a   Sanderson, Jeff P ^a   Mahmoud, Ashraf M ^a   Yoon, Eric Y ^a   Roberts, Cynthia J ^a   Pepose, Jay S ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMILEUSIS; LASER EPITHELIAL KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; CORNEAL STROMA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATECTOMY, SUBEPITHELIAL, LASER-ASSISTED; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS, EXCIMER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL FLAPS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 70349243962     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.041     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ehlers N., and Hjortdal J. Corneal thickness: measurement and implications. Exp Eye Res 78 (2004) 543-548
2. Liu J., and Roberts C.J. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement; quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 146-155
3. Chang D.H., and Stulting R.D. Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK; the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap. Ophthalmology 112 (2005) 1009-1016
4. Jarade E.F., Abi Nader F.C., and Tabbara K.F. Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic and myopic LASIK. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) 408-410
5. Kaufmann C., Bachmann L.M., and Thiel M.A. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (2003) 3790-3794. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/44/9/3790 Accessed June 11, 2009
6. Pepose J.S., Feigenbaum S.K., Qazi M.A., Sanderson J.P., and Roberts C.J. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143 (2007) 39-47
7. Luce D.A. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 156-162
8. Duba I., and Wirthlin A.C. Dynamische Konturtonometrie für Post-LASIK-Augendruckmessungen. [Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 22 (2004) 347-350
9. Fernandes P., Díaz-Rey J.A., Queirós A., Gonzalez-Meijome J.M., and Jorge J. Comparison of the ICare® rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 25 (2005) 436-440
10. Li J., Herndon L.W., Asrani S.G., Stinnett S., and Allingham R.R. Clinical comparison of the Proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the TonoPen. Arch Ophthalmol 122 (2004) 1117-1121
11. Siganos D.S., Papastergiou G.I., and Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 746-751
12. Koller T., Iseli H.P., Donitzky C., Ing D., Papadopoulos N., and Seiler T. Topography-guided surface ablation for forme fruste keratoconus. Ophthalmology 113 (2006) 2198-2202
13. Dawson D.G., Grossniklaus H.E., McCarey B.E., and Edelhauser H.F. Biomechanical and wound healing characteristics of corneas after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: is there a difference between advanced surface ablation and sub-Bowman's keratomileusis?. J Refract Surg 24 (2008) S90-S96
14. Camellin M. Laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia. J Refract Surg 19 (2003) 666-670
15. Smolek M.K., and McCarey B.E. Interlamellar adhesive strength in human eyebank corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31 (1990) 1087-1095. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/31/6/1087 Accessed June 11, 2009
16. Komai Y., and Ushiki T. The three-dimensional organization of collagen fibrils in the human cornea and sclera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32 (1991) 2244-2258. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/32/8/2244 Accessed June 11, 2009
17. Müller L.J., Pels E., and Vrensen G.F.J.M. The specific architecture of the anterior stroma accounts for maintenance of corneal curvature. Br J Ophthalmol 85 (2001) 437-443
18. Roberts C. The cornea is not a piece of plastic. [editorial]. J Refract Surg 16 (2000) 407-413
19. Dupps Jr. W.J., and Roberts C. Effect of acute biomechanical changes on corneal curvature after photokeratectomy. J Refract Surg 17 (2001) 658-669
20. Roberts C. Biomechanics of the cornea and wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 18 (2002) S589-S592
21. Marcos S., Cano D., and Barbero S. Increase in corneal asphericity after standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia is not inherent to the Munnerlyn algorithm. J Refract Surg 19 (2003) S592-S596
22. Li Y., Netto M.V., Shekhar R., Krueger R.R., and Huang D. A longitudinal study of LASIK flap and stromal thickness with high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 114 (2007) 1124-1132
23. Deenadayalu C., Mobasher B., Rajan S.D., and Hall G.W. Refractive change induced by the LASIK flap in a biomechanical finite element model. J Refract Surg 22 (2006) 286-292
24. Dupps Jr. W.J. Hysteresis: new mechanospeak for the ophthalmologist. [editorial]. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 1499-1501
25. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relavent for the clinician?. Surv Ophthalmol 52 suppl 2 (2007) S109-S114
26. Brandt J.D., Beiser J.A., Kass M.A., and Gordon M.O. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS); the Ocular Hypertension Study (OHTS) Group. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 1779-1788
27. Doughty M.J., and Zaman M.L. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44 (2000) 367-408
28. Lleó A., Marcos A., Calatayud M., Alonso L., Rahhal S.M., and Sanchis-Gimeno J.A. The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Exp Optom 86 (2003) 104-108. http://www.optometrists.asn.au/freestyler/files/ceo862104.pdf Accessed June 11, 2009
29. Duch S., Serra A., Castanera J., Abos R., and Quintana M. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma 10 (2001) 261-265
30. Cheng A.C.K., Fan D., Tang E., and Lam D.S.C. Effect of corneal curvature and corneal thickness on the assessment of intraocular pressure using noncontact tonometry in patients after myopic LASIK surgery. Cornea 25 (2006) 26-28
31. Ortiz D., Piñero D., Shabayek M.H., Arnalich-Montiel F., and Alió J.L. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 1371-1375
32. Lam A., Chen D., Chiu R., and Chui W.-S. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese. Optom Vis Sci 84 (2007) 909-914
33. Dupps Jr. W.J., and Wilson S.E. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res 83 (2006) 709-720
34. Kirwan C., O'Keefe M., and Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the Reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol 142 (2006) 990-992
35. Shah S., Laiquzzaman M., Cunliffe I., and Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyzer to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 29 (2006) 257-262
36. Lu F., Xu S., Qu J., Shen M., Wang X., Fang H., and Wang J. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol 143 (2007) 616-622
37. Touboul D., Roberts C., Kerautret J., Garra C., Maurice-Tison S., Saubusse E., and Colin J. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 616-622
38. Laiquzzaman M., Bhojwani R., Cunliffe I., and Shah S. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 34 (2006) 114-118
39. Broman A.T., Congdon N.G., Bandeen-Roche K., and Quigley H.A. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 16 (2007) 581-588
40. Hager A., Loge K., Füllhas M.-O., Schroeder B., Groβherr M., and Wiegand W. Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 144 (2007) 341-346
41. Shah S., Laiquzzaman M., Bhojwani R., Mantry S., and Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 (2007) 3026-3031. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/48/7/3026 Accessed June 11, 2009
42. Kotecha A., Elshaikh A., Roberts C.R., Zhu H., and Garway-Heath D.F. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 5337-5347. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/47/12/5337 Accessed June 11, 2009
43. Kirwan C., and O'Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyzer: finding pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol (Oxford) 86 (2008) 215-218
44. Gatinel D., Chaabouni S., Adam P.-A., Munck J., Puech M., and Hoang-Xuan T. Corneal hysteresis, resistance factor, topography, and pachymetry after corneal lamellar flap. J Refract Surg 23 (2007) 76-84
45. Kerautret J., Colin J., Touboul D., and Roberts C. Biomechanical characteristics of the ectatic cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 510-513
46. Randelman J.B., Dawson D.G., Grossniklaus H.E., McCarey B.E., and Edelhauser H.F. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 24 (2008) S85-S89
47. Kida T., Liu J.H.K., and Weinreb R.N. Effects of aging on corneal biomechanical properties and their impact on 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 146 (2008) 567-572
48. Pallikaris I.G., Kymionis G.D., Ginis H.S., Kounis G.A., and Tsilimbaris M.K. Ocular rigidity in living human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 409-414. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/46/2/414.pdf Accessed June 11, 2009
49. Glass D.H., Roberts C.J., Litsky A.S., and Weber P.A. A viscoelastic biomechanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 (2008) 3919-3926. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/49/9/3919 Accessed June 11, 2009
50. Hamilton D.R., Johnson R.D., Lee N., and Bourla N. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 2049-2056