Responses of fibroblasts and glial cells to nanostructured platinum surfaces

Nanotechnology

Volumn 20, Issue 38, 2009, Pages

  Pennisi, C P ^a   Sevcencu, C ^a   Dolatshahi Pirouz, A ^b   Foss, M ^b   Hansen, J Lundsgaard ^b   Larsen, A Nylandsted ^b   Zachar, V ^a   Besenbacher, F ^b   Yoshida, K ^a,c  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR MORPHOLOGY; CELLULAR PROLIFERATIONS; CELLULAR RESPONSE; CONNECTIVE TISSUE CELLS; CYTOSKELETAL ORGANIZATION; CYTOSKELETONS; GLIAL CELLS; IN-VITRO; METALLIC CONTACTS; MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES; NANO-STRUCTURED; NANOPYRAMIDS; NANOROUGHNESS; NANOSTRUCTURED SUBSTRATES; NEURAL PROSTHESIS; OBSERVATION PERIOD; PLATINUM SURFACE; ROUGH SUBSTRATES; ROUGHNESS SCALE; STIMULATION ELECTRODES; SURFACE NANOTOPOGRAPHY; TISSUE RESPONSE;

CELL MEMBRANES; CELL PROLIFERATION; COLLAGEN; CRYSTAL GROWTH; ELECTRODES; FIBROBLASTS; MOLECULAR BEAM EPITAXY; MOLECULAR BEAMS; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PLATINUM; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACES; TISSUE;

CELL CULTURE;

NANOMATERIAL; PLATINUM; ACTIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL ELONGATION; CELL MATURATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONNECTIVE TISSUE CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; ELECTRODE; EVALUATION; FIBROBLAST; GLIA CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; NANOANALYSIS; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE REACTION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL GROWTH; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SHAPE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; GLIA; METABOLISM; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES;

ACTINS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CELL GROWTH PROCESSES; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SHAPE; CYTOSKELETON; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; NANOSTRUCTURES; NEUROGLIA; PLATINUM; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 70349119132     PISSN: 09574484     EISSN: 13616528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/38/385103     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Finn W E and LoPresti P G 2003 Handbook of Neuroprosthetic Methods (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press)
2. Geddes L A and Roeder R 2003 Criteria for the selection of materials for implanted electrodes Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31 879-90
3. Rousche P J and Normann R A 1998 Chronic recording capability of the Utah intracortical electrode array in cat sensory cortex J. Neurosci. Methods 82 1-15
4. Stieglitz T, Beutel H, Schuettler M and Meyer J 2000 Micromachined, polyimide-based devices for flexible neural interfaces Biomed. Microdevices 2 283-94
5. Norlin P, Kindlundh M, Mouroux A, Yoshida K and Hofmann U G 2002 A 32-site neural recording probe fabricated by DRIE of SOI substrates J. Micromech. Microeng. 12 414-9
6. Vetter R J, Williams J C, Hetke J F, Nunamaker E A and Kipke D R 2004 Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51 896-904
7. Navarro X, Krueger T B, Lago N, Micera S, Stieglitz T and Dario P 2005 A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 10 229-58
8. Edell D J, Toi V V, McNeil V M and Clark L D 1992 Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39 635-43
9. Lago N, Yoshida K, Koch K P and Navarro X 2007 Assessment of biocompatibility of chronically implanted polyimide and platinum intrafascicular electrodes IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54 281-90
10. Ignatius M J, Sawhney N, Gupta A, Thibadeau B M, Monteiro O R and Brown I G 1998 Bioactive surface coatings for nanoscale instruments: effects on CNS neurons J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 40 264-74
11. Mensinger A F, Anderson D J, Buchko C J, Johnson M A, Martin D C, Tresco P A, Silver R B and Highstein S M 2000 Chronic recording of regenerating VIIIth nerve axons with a sieve electrode J. Neurophysiol. 83 611-5
12. Zhong Y, Yu X, Gilbert R and Bellamkonda R V 2001 Stabilizing electrode-host interfaces: a tissue engineering approach J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 38 627-32
13. Cui X, Lee V A, Raphael Y, Wiler J A, Hetke J F, Anderson D J and Martin D C 2001 Surface modification of neural recording electrodes with conducting polymer/biomolecule blends J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 56 261-72
14. Cui X, Wiler J, Dzaman M, Altschuler R A and Martin D C 2003 In vivo studies of polypyrrole/peptide coated neural probes Biomaterials 24 777-87
15. He W and Bellamkonda R V 2005 Nanoscale neuro-integrative coatings for neural implants Biomaterials 26 2983-90
16. Flemming R G, Murphy C J, Abrams G A, Goodman S L and Nealey P F 1999 Effects of synthetic micro-and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior Biomaterials 20 573-88
17. Craighead H G, James C D and Turner A M P 2001 Chemical and topographical patterning for directed cell attachment Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 5 177-84
18. Curtis A and Wilkinson C 2001 Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology Trends Biotechnol. 19 97-101
19. Stevens M M and George J H 2005 Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface Science 310 1135-8
20. Kriparamanan R, Aswath P, Zhou A, Tang L and Nguyen K T 2006 Nanotopography: cellular responses to nanostructured materials J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 6 1905-19
21. Moxon K A, Kalkhoran N M, Markert M, Sambito M A, McKenzie J L and Webster J T 2004 Nanostructured surface modification of ceramic-based microelectrodes to enhance biocompatibility for a direct brain-machine interface IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51 881-9
22. Sevcencu C, Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Foss M, Larsen A N, Hansen J L, Zachar V, Besenbacher F and Yoshida K 2007 The effect of modification of the nano-topography of implantable surfaces on the proliferation of fibroblasts Proc. 9th Vienna Int. Workshop on FES (Krems) pp275-8
23. Selvakumaran J, Hughes M P, Keddie J L and Ewins D J 2002 Assessing biocompatibility of materials for implantable microelectrodes using cytotoxicity and protein adsorption studies Proc. 2nd Annu. Int. IEEE-EMB Spec. Top. Conf. on Microtechnol. Med. Biol. (Madison) pp261-4
24. Turner N, Armitage M, Butler R and Ireland G 2004 An in vitro model to evaluate cell adhesion to metals used in implantation shows significant differences between palladium and gold or platinum Cell Biol. Int. 28 541-7
25. Bajaj P, Akin D, Gupta A, Sherman D, Shi B, Auciello O and Bashir R 2007 Ultrananocrystalline diamond film as an optimal cell interface for biomedical applications Biomed. Microdevices 9 787-94
26. Turner S, Kam L, Isaacson M, Craighead H G, Shain W and Turner J 1997 Cell attachment on silicon nanostructures J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 15 2848-54
27. Riedel M, Müller B and Wintermantel E 2001 Protein adsorption and monocyte activation on germanium nanopyramids Biomaterials 22 2307-16
28. Dalby M J, Riehle M O, Johnstone H J H, Affrossman S and Curtis A S G 2002 Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation Tissue Eng. 8 1099-108
29. Curtis A S G, Gadegaard N, Dalby M J, Riehle M O, Wilkinson C D W and Aitchison G 2004 Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 3 61-5
30. Dalby M J, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle M O, Herzyk P, Wilkinson C D W and Oreffo R O C 2007 The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder Nat. Mater. 6 997-1003
31. Mo Y, Savage D E, Swartzentruber B S and Lagally M G 1990 Kinetic pathway in Stranski-Krastanov growth of Ge on Si(001) Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 1020-3
32. Medeiros-Ribeiro G, Bratkovski A M, Kamins T I, Ohlberg D A A and Williams R S 1998 Shape transition of germanium nanocrystals on a silicon (001) surface from pyramids to domes Science 279 353-5
33. Balle J, Hansen J L and Larsen A N 2006 Trimodal island distribution of Ge nanodots on (001)Si J. Appl. Phys. 100 066104
34. Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Pennisi C P, Skeldal S, Foss M, Chevallier J, Zachar V, Andreasen P, Yoshida K and Besenbacher F 2009 The influence of glancing angle deposited nano-rough platinum surfaces on the adsorption of fibrinogen and the proliferation of primary human fibroblasts Nanotechnology 20 095101
35. Huang S and Ingber D E 1999 The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control Nat. Cell Biol. 1 E131-8
36. Dalby M J, Riehle M O, Sutherland D S, Agheli H and Curtis A S G 2004 Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography Biomaterials 25 5415-22 (Pubitemid 38586756)
37. Berry C C, Dalby M J, McCloy D and Affrossman S 2005 The fibroblast response to tubes exhibiting internal nanotopography Biomaterials 26 4985-92
38. Faix J and Rottner K 2006 The making of filopodia Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18 18-25
39. Folkman J and Moscona A 1978 Role of cell shape in growth control Nature 273 345-9
40. Small J V, Rottner K, Kaverina I and Anderson K I 1998 Assembling an actin cytoskeleton for cell attachment and movement Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 1404 271-81
41. Peterson S L, McDonald A, Gourley P L and Sasaki D Y 2005 Poly(dimethylsiloxane) thin films as biocompatible coatings for microfluidic devices: cell culture and flow studies with glial cells J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 72 10-8
42. Dalby M J, Riehle M O, Johnstone H, Affrossman S and Curtis A S G 2002 In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography Biomaterials 23 2945-54